利用社区合作参与式研究,重视“社区视角”,促进社区学术合作的公平性。

IF 2.6 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Equity Pub Date : 2023-09-13 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1089/heq.2023.0096
Hafifa Siddiq, Felica Jones, Zoe Magnes, Juanita Booker-Vaughns, Angela Young-Brinn, Clarence Williams, Madeline Washington, Etsemaye Agonafer, Olga Solomon, Adrian Oliva, Kenneth Wells, MarySue V Heilemann
{"title":"利用社区合作参与式研究,重视“社区视角”,促进社区学术合作的公平性。","authors":"Hafifa Siddiq, Felica Jones, Zoe Magnes, Juanita Booker-Vaughns, Angela Young-Brinn, Clarence Williams, Madeline Washington, Etsemaye Agonafer, Olga Solomon, Adrian Oliva, Kenneth Wells, MarySue V Heilemann","doi":"10.1089/heq.2023.0096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community input is crucial for identifying characteristics necessary for equitable, sustainable community-academic partnerships (CAPs). A November 2021 conference, honoring the late Dr. Loretta Jones and the Community-Partnered Participatory Research (CPPR) model, was held to gather input for designing a learning institute for community members as co-equal partners with academics in research, program, and policy initiatives. This created an opportunity to explore attendees' perspectives on challenges and opportunities related to CAPs with special focus on promoting equity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Five break-out discussion group sessions were conducted in November 2021 co-facilitated by both an academic and a community leader. After consent, discussions were recorded and transcribed. An iterative procedure for collaborative-group-thematic-analysis was developed. The six-phase process included rigorous coding, discussion, comparison of data with data, and development and refinement of themes and subthemes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 38 racial-ethnically diverse participants volunteered from the total conference audience of 62 community and academic partners from various sectors including community-based organizations, health care, social services, academia, or policy within Los Angeles County. Analysis led to development of three themes: Being cautious with the extractive tendency of academia and the need for anti-racism within CAPs; Leveraging community power to resist the top-down lens of academia; and bridging two worlds through an equitably structured table.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Participants described optimism about the future uses of CPPR to enhance CAPs, and the need to address barriers to equitable partnerships owing to unequal social contexts and entrenched power dynamics. Implications include addressing racism, evaluating financial equity in partnerships to promote accountability, and mentoring community leaders to promote equity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of a \"community lens\" for developing sustainable, equitable CAPs is crucial to promote accountability and to responsibly implement authentic CPPR.</p>","PeriodicalId":36602,"journal":{"name":"Health Equity","volume":"7 1","pages":"543-554"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507929/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Community-Partnered Participatory Research to Value the \\\"Community Lens\\\" and Promote Equity in Community-Academic Partnerships.\",\"authors\":\"Hafifa Siddiq, Felica Jones, Zoe Magnes, Juanita Booker-Vaughns, Angela Young-Brinn, Clarence Williams, Madeline Washington, Etsemaye Agonafer, Olga Solomon, Adrian Oliva, Kenneth Wells, MarySue V Heilemann\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/heq.2023.0096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community input is crucial for identifying characteristics necessary for equitable, sustainable community-academic partnerships (CAPs). A November 2021 conference, honoring the late Dr. Loretta Jones and the Community-Partnered Participatory Research (CPPR) model, was held to gather input for designing a learning institute for community members as co-equal partners with academics in research, program, and policy initiatives. This created an opportunity to explore attendees' perspectives on challenges and opportunities related to CAPs with special focus on promoting equity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Five break-out discussion group sessions were conducted in November 2021 co-facilitated by both an academic and a community leader. After consent, discussions were recorded and transcribed. An iterative procedure for collaborative-group-thematic-analysis was developed. The six-phase process included rigorous coding, discussion, comparison of data with data, and development and refinement of themes and subthemes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 38 racial-ethnically diverse participants volunteered from the total conference audience of 62 community and academic partners from various sectors including community-based organizations, health care, social services, academia, or policy within Los Angeles County. Analysis led to development of three themes: Being cautious with the extractive tendency of academia and the need for anti-racism within CAPs; Leveraging community power to resist the top-down lens of academia; and bridging two worlds through an equitably structured table.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Participants described optimism about the future uses of CPPR to enhance CAPs, and the need to address barriers to equitable partnerships owing to unequal social contexts and entrenched power dynamics. Implications include addressing racism, evaluating financial equity in partnerships to promote accountability, and mentoring community leaders to promote equity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of a \\\"community lens\\\" for developing sustainable, equitable CAPs is crucial to promote accountability and to responsibly implement authentic CPPR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Equity\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"543-554\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507929/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Equity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2023.0096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2023.0096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:社区投入对于确定公平、可持续的社区学术伙伴关系所需的特征至关重要。2021年11月,举行了一次会议,表彰已故的Loretta Jones博士和社区合作参与研究(CPRR)模式,为设计一个学习机构收集意见,该机构面向社区成员,在研究、计划和政策举措中与学者共同平等合作。这为探讨与会者对CAPs相关挑战和机遇的看法创造了机会,特别关注促进公平。方法:获得机构审查委员会的批准。2021年11月,在一名学者和一名社区领袖的共同推动下,举行了五次分组讨论会。同意后,讨论被记录下来并转录。开发了一个用于协作小组主题分析的迭代程序。六个阶段的过程包括严格的编码、讨论、数据与数据的比较,以及主题和子主题的开发和提炼。结果:共有38名不同种族的参与者从来自洛杉矶县社区组织、医疗保健、社会服务、学术界或政策等各个部门的62名社区和学术合作伙伴的会议观众中自愿参加。分析导致了三个主题的发展:谨慎对待学术界的榨取倾向和CAPs内部反种族主义的必要性;利用社区力量抵制学术界自上而下的视角;以及通过一个结构合理的表格连接两个世界。讨论:与会者描述了对未来利用CPPR来加强CAPs的乐观态度,以及由于不平等的社会背景和根深蒂固的权力动态而需要解决公平伙伴关系的障碍。影响包括解决种族主义问题,评估伙伴关系中的财务公平以促进问责制,以及指导社区领导人以促进公平。结论:利用“社区视角”制定可持续、公平的CAPs对于促进问责制和负责任地实施真正的CPPR至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Community-Partnered Participatory Research to Value the "Community Lens" and Promote Equity in Community-Academic Partnerships.

Background: Community input is crucial for identifying characteristics necessary for equitable, sustainable community-academic partnerships (CAPs). A November 2021 conference, honoring the late Dr. Loretta Jones and the Community-Partnered Participatory Research (CPPR) model, was held to gather input for designing a learning institute for community members as co-equal partners with academics in research, program, and policy initiatives. This created an opportunity to explore attendees' perspectives on challenges and opportunities related to CAPs with special focus on promoting equity.

Methods: Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Five break-out discussion group sessions were conducted in November 2021 co-facilitated by both an academic and a community leader. After consent, discussions were recorded and transcribed. An iterative procedure for collaborative-group-thematic-analysis was developed. The six-phase process included rigorous coding, discussion, comparison of data with data, and development and refinement of themes and subthemes.

Results: A total of 38 racial-ethnically diverse participants volunteered from the total conference audience of 62 community and academic partners from various sectors including community-based organizations, health care, social services, academia, or policy within Los Angeles County. Analysis led to development of three themes: Being cautious with the extractive tendency of academia and the need for anti-racism within CAPs; Leveraging community power to resist the top-down lens of academia; and bridging two worlds through an equitably structured table.

Discussion: Participants described optimism about the future uses of CPPR to enhance CAPs, and the need to address barriers to equitable partnerships owing to unequal social contexts and entrenched power dynamics. Implications include addressing racism, evaluating financial equity in partnerships to promote accountability, and mentoring community leaders to promote equity.

Conclusion: Use of a "community lens" for developing sustainable, equitable CAPs is crucial to promote accountability and to responsibly implement authentic CPPR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Equity
Health Equity Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
97
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信