Microtech®-VAC支架治疗食管瘘:三例单中心早期经验。

IF 3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Pub Date : 2023-09-28 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26317745231200312
Michelle A Klose, Jens Walldorf, Marko Damm, Sebastian Krug, Johannes Klose, Ulrich Ronellenfitsch, Joerg Kleeff, Patrick Michl, Jonas Rosendahl
{"title":"Microtech®-VAC支架治疗食管瘘:三例单中心早期经验。","authors":"Michelle A Klose,&nbsp;Jens Walldorf,&nbsp;Marko Damm,&nbsp;Sebastian Krug,&nbsp;Johannes Klose,&nbsp;Ulrich Ronellenfitsch,&nbsp;Joerg Kleeff,&nbsp;Patrick Michl,&nbsp;Jonas Rosendahl","doi":"10.1177/26317745231200312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic approaches in the treatment of transmural esophageal defects, either after esophageal resection or due to perforation, have demonstrated convincing feasibility. Surgical options are limited and associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Currently, internal endoscopic drainage with pigtail stents, self-expanding metal stent (SEMS), or endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) are options for first-line treatment. Here, we report the outcome of the recently developed combination of SEMS and EVT using the endoscopic Microtech<sup>®</sup>-VAC-Stent (EVS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between June and July 2022, three consecutive patients (one female and two males) with esophageal transmural defects were treated with the Microtech<sup>®</sup>-VAC-Stent. Two patients suffered from an anastomotic leak after oncologic gastroesophageal surgery, and one patient presented with esophageal perforation due to Boerhaave syndrome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three consecutive patients were successfully treated with EVS. In one patient, one EVS treatment was sufficient, whereas the other two patients needed two and six EVS exchanges. Exchanges were scheduled every 7 days and no procedural adverse events were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In line with the former case series, EVS therapy is a promising new approach for the treatment of esophageal leaks. Exchange of the EVS seems feasible every 7 days reducing interventions for the individual patient. Prospective studies comparing EVS with other endoscopic therapies are needed to define the best therapeutic approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":40947,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"16 ","pages":"26317745231200312"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3f/fe/10.1177_26317745231200312.PMC10540572.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of esophageal leakages with the Microtech<sup>®</sup>-VAC-Stent: a monocentric early experience of three cases.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle A Klose,&nbsp;Jens Walldorf,&nbsp;Marko Damm,&nbsp;Sebastian Krug,&nbsp;Johannes Klose,&nbsp;Ulrich Ronellenfitsch,&nbsp;Joerg Kleeff,&nbsp;Patrick Michl,&nbsp;Jonas Rosendahl\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26317745231200312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic approaches in the treatment of transmural esophageal defects, either after esophageal resection or due to perforation, have demonstrated convincing feasibility. Surgical options are limited and associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Currently, internal endoscopic drainage with pigtail stents, self-expanding metal stent (SEMS), or endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) are options for first-line treatment. Here, we report the outcome of the recently developed combination of SEMS and EVT using the endoscopic Microtech<sup>®</sup>-VAC-Stent (EVS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between June and July 2022, three consecutive patients (one female and two males) with esophageal transmural defects were treated with the Microtech<sup>®</sup>-VAC-Stent. Two patients suffered from an anastomotic leak after oncologic gastroesophageal surgery, and one patient presented with esophageal perforation due to Boerhaave syndrome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three consecutive patients were successfully treated with EVS. In one patient, one EVS treatment was sufficient, whereas the other two patients needed two and six EVS exchanges. Exchanges were scheduled every 7 days and no procedural adverse events were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In line with the former case series, EVS therapy is a promising new approach for the treatment of esophageal leaks. Exchange of the EVS seems feasible every 7 days reducing interventions for the individual patient. Prospective studies comparing EVS with other endoscopic therapies are needed to define the best therapeutic approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"26317745231200312\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3f/fe/10.1177_26317745231200312.PMC10540572.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26317745231200312\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26317745231200312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:内镜下治疗跨壁食管缺损的方法,无论是在食管切除术后还是由于穿孔,都已证明了令人信服的可行性。手术选择有限,且发病率和死亡率较高。目前,使用猪尾支架的内窥镜引流、自膨胀金属支架(SEMS)或内窥镜真空治疗(EVT)是一线治疗的选择。在此,我们报告了最近使用内镜Microtech®-VAC支架(EVS)开发的SEMS和EVT组合的结果。方法:2022年6月至7月,连续三名食管透壁缺损患者(一名女性和两名男性)使用Microtech®/VAC支架进行治疗。两名患者在肿瘤胃食管手术后发生吻合口瘘,一名患者因Boerhaave综合征出现食道穿孔。结果:连续3例患者成功接受EVS治疗。在一名患者中,一次EVS治疗就足够了,而其他两名患者需要两次和六次EVS交换。每7天安排一次交流 天,未观察到任何程序性不良事件。结论:与以往的病例系列一致,EVS治疗是一种很有前途的治疗食管瘘的新方法。电动车辆供电系统的更换似乎可行,每7次 减少个体患者干预的天数。需要对EVS与其他内窥镜疗法进行前瞻性研究,以确定最佳治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Treatment of esophageal leakages with the Microtech<sup>®</sup>-VAC-Stent: a monocentric early experience of three cases.

Treatment of esophageal leakages with the Microtech<sup>®</sup>-VAC-Stent: a monocentric early experience of three cases.

Treatment of esophageal leakages with the Microtech<sup>®</sup>-VAC-Stent: a monocentric early experience of three cases.

Treatment of esophageal leakages with the Microtech®-VAC-Stent: a monocentric early experience of three cases.

Background: Endoscopic approaches in the treatment of transmural esophageal defects, either after esophageal resection or due to perforation, have demonstrated convincing feasibility. Surgical options are limited and associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Currently, internal endoscopic drainage with pigtail stents, self-expanding metal stent (SEMS), or endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) are options for first-line treatment. Here, we report the outcome of the recently developed combination of SEMS and EVT using the endoscopic Microtech®-VAC-Stent (EVS).

Methods: Between June and July 2022, three consecutive patients (one female and two males) with esophageal transmural defects were treated with the Microtech®-VAC-Stent. Two patients suffered from an anastomotic leak after oncologic gastroesophageal surgery, and one patient presented with esophageal perforation due to Boerhaave syndrome.

Results: Three consecutive patients were successfully treated with EVS. In one patient, one EVS treatment was sufficient, whereas the other two patients needed two and six EVS exchanges. Exchanges were scheduled every 7 days and no procedural adverse events were observed.

Conclusion: In line with the former case series, EVS therapy is a promising new approach for the treatment of esophageal leaks. Exchange of the EVS seems feasible every 7 days reducing interventions for the individual patient. Prospective studies comparing EVS with other endoscopic therapies are needed to define the best therapeutic approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信