2%局部利多卡因凝胶对神经传导研究中电刺激不适的影响——一项前瞻性双盲安慰剂对照研究。

IF 1.5 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Local and Regional Anesthesia Pub Date : 2023-09-26 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/LRA.S426076
Kefah Al-Hayk, Mahmoud M Smadi, Lina M Elsalem, Ahmed Yassin, Suha Aqaileh, Deema H Obiedat, Ahmad Kefah Al-Hayk, Majdi Al Qawasmeh, Raid Kofahi, Khalid El-Salem
{"title":"2%局部利多卡因凝胶对神经传导研究中电刺激不适的影响——一项前瞻性双盲安慰剂对照研究。","authors":"Kefah Al-Hayk,&nbsp;Mahmoud M Smadi,&nbsp;Lina M Elsalem,&nbsp;Ahmed Yassin,&nbsp;Suha Aqaileh,&nbsp;Deema H Obiedat,&nbsp;Ahmad Kefah Al-Hayk,&nbsp;Majdi Al Qawasmeh,&nbsp;Raid Kofahi,&nbsp;Khalid El-Salem","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S426076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Procedure discomfort can limit electrodiagnostic studies. Reducing discomfort can maximize the benefits of these diagnostic tools. This study targeted the discomfort associated with nerve conduction studies (NCS).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This was a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study comparing the effect of topical lidocaine gel (2%) versus analgesic-free lubricant gel (K-Y gel) on pain perception during NCS. Sequential patients (n=130) referred for routine NCS participated in the study. We applied 1 mL of lidocaine gel to one palm, and 1 mL of K-Y gel to the other as a control. After 20-45 min of application, graded increments of electrical stimulation intensity were delivered to record the median and ulnar mixed palmar nerve responses. Patients were then asked to score the degree of pain felt from electrical stimulation over each palm using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale (WBFPS) and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), independent of baseline pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean WBFPS and NRS scores for lidocaine-treated palms were significantly lower than those for controls using parametric paired <i>t</i>-test (3.79 vs 4.37 and 3.35 vs 3.78 respectively, all p-values<0.05). Subgroup analysis showed a significant decrease in mean scores in females, patients aged ≤50 years, patients without a history of previous NCS, and patients without comorbidities (all p-values<0.05). Median scores using nonparametric Wilcoxon ranked test also showed statistically significant differences (all p-values<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicate that topical lidocaine 2% gel reduces discomfort associated with NCS. However, despite the statistical significance, clear clinical significance may be lacking. Clinical implementation may be considered for the subgroups that showed the greatest benefit. Further studies that incorporate more efficient drug delivery methods may yield better results.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"16 ","pages":"153-163"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f7/1e/lra-16-153.PMC10543085.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of 2% Topical Lidocaine Gel on Discomfort from Electrical Stimulation During Nerve Conduction Studies- A Prospective Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study.\",\"authors\":\"Kefah Al-Hayk,&nbsp;Mahmoud M Smadi,&nbsp;Lina M Elsalem,&nbsp;Ahmed Yassin,&nbsp;Suha Aqaileh,&nbsp;Deema H Obiedat,&nbsp;Ahmad Kefah Al-Hayk,&nbsp;Majdi Al Qawasmeh,&nbsp;Raid Kofahi,&nbsp;Khalid El-Salem\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/LRA.S426076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Procedure discomfort can limit electrodiagnostic studies. Reducing discomfort can maximize the benefits of these diagnostic tools. This study targeted the discomfort associated with nerve conduction studies (NCS).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This was a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study comparing the effect of topical lidocaine gel (2%) versus analgesic-free lubricant gel (K-Y gel) on pain perception during NCS. Sequential patients (n=130) referred for routine NCS participated in the study. We applied 1 mL of lidocaine gel to one palm, and 1 mL of K-Y gel to the other as a control. After 20-45 min of application, graded increments of electrical stimulation intensity were delivered to record the median and ulnar mixed palmar nerve responses. Patients were then asked to score the degree of pain felt from electrical stimulation over each palm using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale (WBFPS) and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), independent of baseline pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean WBFPS and NRS scores for lidocaine-treated palms were significantly lower than those for controls using parametric paired <i>t</i>-test (3.79 vs 4.37 and 3.35 vs 3.78 respectively, all p-values<0.05). Subgroup analysis showed a significant decrease in mean scores in females, patients aged ≤50 years, patients without a history of previous NCS, and patients without comorbidities (all p-values<0.05). Median scores using nonparametric Wilcoxon ranked test also showed statistically significant differences (all p-values<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicate that topical lidocaine 2% gel reduces discomfort associated with NCS. However, despite the statistical significance, clear clinical significance may be lacking. Clinical implementation may be considered for the subgroups that showed the greatest benefit. Further studies that incorporate more efficient drug delivery methods may yield better results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Local and Regional Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"153-163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f7/1e/lra-16-153.PMC10543085.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Local and Regional Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S426076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S426076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:手术不适可能限制电诊断研究。减少不适感可以最大限度地发挥这些诊断工具的优势。本研究针对与神经传导研究(NCS)相关的不适。患者和方法:这是一项前瞻性随机双盲安慰剂对照研究,比较了局部利多卡因凝胶(2%)与无镇痛润滑剂凝胶(K-Y凝胶)对NCS期间疼痛感知的影响。接受常规NCS转诊的连续患者(n=130)参与了该研究。我们将1 mL利多卡因凝胶涂抹在一只手掌上,将1 mL K-Y凝胶涂抹在另一只手掌作为对照。施用20-45分钟后,给予电刺激强度的分级增量,以记录正中和尺骨混合掌神经反应。然后,患者被要求使用Wong Baker Faces疼痛量表(WBFPS)和数字评定量表(NRS)对每个手掌的电刺激疼痛程度进行评分,与基线疼痛无关。结果:使用参数配对t检验,利多卡因治疗手掌的平均WBFPS和NRS评分显著低于对照组(分别为3.79 vs 4.37和3.35 vs 3.78,均为p值。结论:研究结果表明,2%利多卡因凝胶可减轻NCS引起的不适。然而,尽管具有统计学意义,但可能缺乏明确的临床意义。可考虑对显示出最大益处的亚组进行临床实施省略方法可能会产生更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of 2% Topical Lidocaine Gel on Discomfort from Electrical Stimulation During Nerve Conduction Studies- A Prospective Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study.

Effect of 2% Topical Lidocaine Gel on Discomfort from Electrical Stimulation During Nerve Conduction Studies- A Prospective Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study.

Effect of 2% Topical Lidocaine Gel on Discomfort from Electrical Stimulation During Nerve Conduction Studies- A Prospective Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study.

Effect of 2% Topical Lidocaine Gel on Discomfort from Electrical Stimulation During Nerve Conduction Studies- A Prospective Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study.

Purpose: Procedure discomfort can limit electrodiagnostic studies. Reducing discomfort can maximize the benefits of these diagnostic tools. This study targeted the discomfort associated with nerve conduction studies (NCS).

Patients and methods: This was a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study comparing the effect of topical lidocaine gel (2%) versus analgesic-free lubricant gel (K-Y gel) on pain perception during NCS. Sequential patients (n=130) referred for routine NCS participated in the study. We applied 1 mL of lidocaine gel to one palm, and 1 mL of K-Y gel to the other as a control. After 20-45 min of application, graded increments of electrical stimulation intensity were delivered to record the median and ulnar mixed palmar nerve responses. Patients were then asked to score the degree of pain felt from electrical stimulation over each palm using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale (WBFPS) and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), independent of baseline pain.

Results: Mean WBFPS and NRS scores for lidocaine-treated palms were significantly lower than those for controls using parametric paired t-test (3.79 vs 4.37 and 3.35 vs 3.78 respectively, all p-values<0.05). Subgroup analysis showed a significant decrease in mean scores in females, patients aged ≤50 years, patients without a history of previous NCS, and patients without comorbidities (all p-values<0.05). Median scores using nonparametric Wilcoxon ranked test also showed statistically significant differences (all p-values<0.05).

Conclusion: The results indicate that topical lidocaine 2% gel reduces discomfort associated with NCS. However, despite the statistical significance, clear clinical significance may be lacking. Clinical implementation may be considered for the subgroups that showed the greatest benefit. Further studies that incorporate more efficient drug delivery methods may yield better results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信