通过台式核磁共振波谱进行反应监测:在线停流和连续流采样方法的实际比较。

IF 1.9 3区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Tristan Maschmeyer, David J. Russell, José G. Napolitano, Jason E. Hein
{"title":"通过台式核磁共振波谱进行反应监测:在线停流和连续流采样方法的实际比较。","authors":"Tristan Maschmeyer,&nbsp;David J. Russell,&nbsp;José G. Napolitano,&nbsp;Jason E. Hein","doi":"10.1002/mrc.5395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The ability for nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to provide quantitative, structurally rich information makes this spectroscopic technique an attractive reaction monitoring tool. The practicality of NMR for this type of analysis has only increased in the recent years with the influx of commercially available benchtop NMR instruments and compatible flow systems. In this study, we aim to compare <sup>19</sup>F NMR reaction profiles acquired under both <i>on-line</i> continuous-flow and stopped-flow sampling methods, with modern benchtop NMR instrumentation, and two reaction systems: a homogeneous imination reaction and a biphasic activation of a carboxylic acid to acyl fluoride. Reaction trends with higher data density can be acquired with <i>on-line</i> continuous-flow analyses, and this work highlights that representative reaction trends can be acquired without any correction when monitoring resonances with a shorter spin–lattice relaxation time (<i>T</i><sub>1</sub>), and with the used flow conditions. <i>On-line</i> stopped-flow analyses resulted in representative reaction trends in all cases, including the monitoring of resonances with a long <i>T</i><sub>1</sub>, without the need of any correction factors. The benefit of easier data analysis, however, comes with the cost of time, as the fresh reaction solution must be flowed into the NMR system, halted, and time must be provided for spins to become polarized in the instrument's external magnetic field prior to spectral measurement. Results for one of the reactions were additionally compared with the use of a high-field NMR.</p>","PeriodicalId":18142,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry","volume":"62 4","pages":"310-322"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mrc.5395","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reaction monitoring via benchtop nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy: A practical comparison of on-line stopped-flow and continuous-flow sampling methods\",\"authors\":\"Tristan Maschmeyer,&nbsp;David J. Russell,&nbsp;José G. Napolitano,&nbsp;Jason E. Hein\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mrc.5395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The ability for nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to provide quantitative, structurally rich information makes this spectroscopic technique an attractive reaction monitoring tool. The practicality of NMR for this type of analysis has only increased in the recent years with the influx of commercially available benchtop NMR instruments and compatible flow systems. In this study, we aim to compare <sup>19</sup>F NMR reaction profiles acquired under both <i>on-line</i> continuous-flow and stopped-flow sampling methods, with modern benchtop NMR instrumentation, and two reaction systems: a homogeneous imination reaction and a biphasic activation of a carboxylic acid to acyl fluoride. Reaction trends with higher data density can be acquired with <i>on-line</i> continuous-flow analyses, and this work highlights that representative reaction trends can be acquired without any correction when monitoring resonances with a shorter spin–lattice relaxation time (<i>T</i><sub>1</sub>), and with the used flow conditions. <i>On-line</i> stopped-flow analyses resulted in representative reaction trends in all cases, including the monitoring of resonances with a long <i>T</i><sub>1</sub>, without the need of any correction factors. The benefit of easier data analysis, however, comes with the cost of time, as the fresh reaction solution must be flowed into the NMR system, halted, and time must be provided for spins to become polarized in the instrument's external magnetic field prior to spectral measurement. Results for one of the reactions were additionally compared with the use of a high-field NMR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"62 4\",\"pages\":\"310-322\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mrc.5395\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mrc.5395\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mrc.5395","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

核磁共振(NMR)光谱提供定量、结构丰富的信息的能力使这种光谱技术成为一种有吸引力的反应监测工具。近年来,随着商用台式NMR仪器和兼容的流动系统的涌入,NMR在这类分析中的实用性才有所提高。在这项研究中,我们的目的是比较在在线连续流和停流采样方法下获得的19F NMR反应谱,使用现代台式NMR仪器,以及两种反应系统:均相激发光反应和羧酸向酰氟的双相活化。通过在线连续流动分析可以获得具有更高数据密度的反应趋势,这项工作强调,当用更短的自旋晶格弛豫时间(T1)和所用的流动条件监测共振时,可以在没有任何校正的情况下获得代表性的反应趋势。在线停流分析在所有情况下都产生了具有代表性的反应趋势,包括在不需要任何校正因子的情况下监测具有长T1的共振。然而,更容易的数据分析带来的好处是时间成本,因为新鲜的反应溶液必须流入NMR系统,停止,并且在光谱测量之前,必须为自旋在仪器的外部磁场中极化提供时间。另外将其中一个反应的结果与使用高场NMR进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Reaction monitoring via benchtop nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy: A practical comparison of on-line stopped-flow and continuous-flow sampling methods

Reaction monitoring via benchtop nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy: A practical comparison of on-line stopped-flow and continuous-flow sampling methods

The ability for nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to provide quantitative, structurally rich information makes this spectroscopic technique an attractive reaction monitoring tool. The practicality of NMR for this type of analysis has only increased in the recent years with the influx of commercially available benchtop NMR instruments and compatible flow systems. In this study, we aim to compare 19F NMR reaction profiles acquired under both on-line continuous-flow and stopped-flow sampling methods, with modern benchtop NMR instrumentation, and two reaction systems: a homogeneous imination reaction and a biphasic activation of a carboxylic acid to acyl fluoride. Reaction trends with higher data density can be acquired with on-line continuous-flow analyses, and this work highlights that representative reaction trends can be acquired without any correction when monitoring resonances with a shorter spin–lattice relaxation time (T1), and with the used flow conditions. On-line stopped-flow analyses resulted in representative reaction trends in all cases, including the monitoring of resonances with a long T1, without the need of any correction factors. The benefit of easier data analysis, however, comes with the cost of time, as the fresh reaction solution must be flowed into the NMR system, halted, and time must be provided for spins to become polarized in the instrument's external magnetic field prior to spectral measurement. Results for one of the reactions were additionally compared with the use of a high-field NMR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: MRC is devoted to the rapid publication of papers which are concerned with the development of magnetic resonance techniques, or in which the application of such techniques plays a pivotal part. Contributions from scientists working in all areas of NMR, ESR and NQR are invited, and papers describing applications in all branches of chemistry, structural biology and materials chemistry are published. The journal is of particular interest not only to scientists working in academic research, but also those working in commercial organisations who need to keep up-to-date with the latest practical applications of magnetic resonance techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信