Sarah E Zemore, Kelly L Ziemer, Paul A Gilbert, Mitchell P Karno, Lee Ann Kaskutas
{"title":"理解物质使用障碍康复的共同意义:《什么是康复?学习","authors":"Sarah E Zemore, Kelly L Ziemer, Paul A Gilbert, Mitchell P Karno, Lee Ann Kaskutas","doi":"10.1177/11782218231199372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Substance use disorder (SUD) resolution typically involves a long-term, comprehensive process of change now widely referred to as \"recovery.\" Yet, definitions of recovery vary substantially, producing significant confusion. To support formal recovery definitions, we aimed to systematically identify recovery elements that are central to those in recovery and shared regardless of subgroup/pathway.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were from the What is Recovery? Study, involving a diverse, national, online survey of people in recovery (N = 9341). Surveys included a 35-item recovery measure reflecting 4 domains; participants reported whether or not each element definitely belonged in their recovery definitions. Analyses examined item endorsements overall and among 30 subgroups defined <i>a priori</i> (by sociodemographics, substance use characteristics, and help-seeking history) to determine where items met study-specific centrality thresholds (ie, endorsement by ⩾80% and top-10 ranking, by endorsement level). We then classified items as \"core\" if meeting centrality thresholds both overall and for all 30 subgroups, and \"prevalent\" if meeting centrality thresholds overall and for 26 to 29 subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four \"core\" recovery elements emerged, including a process of growth or development; being honest with oneself; taking responsibility for the things one can change; and reacting in a more balanced way. Four \"prevalent\" recovery elements also emerged, referencing the ability to enjoy life and handle negative feelings without substance use; abstinence and/or nonproblematic substance use; and living a life that contributes. Subgroups differing most in their endorsements included those reporting mild/moderate SUD severity; non-abstinent recovery; and no specialty treatment or mutual-help group attendance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recovery elements identified here partially reflect some stakeholder definitions, but offer greater specificity and include novel elements (eg, personal integrity). Elements may point to areas of functioning that are damaged in the addiction process and can support an addiction-free life. Findings should inform institutional recovery definitions; SUD services and research; and communications about recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":22185,"journal":{"name":"Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment","volume":"17 ","pages":"11782218231199372"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f4/91/10.1177_11782218231199372.PMC10508054.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the Shared Meaning of Recovery From Substance Use Disorders: New Findings From the What is Recovery? Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah E Zemore, Kelly L Ziemer, Paul A Gilbert, Mitchell P Karno, Lee Ann Kaskutas\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11782218231199372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Substance use disorder (SUD) resolution typically involves a long-term, comprehensive process of change now widely referred to as \\\"recovery.\\\" Yet, definitions of recovery vary substantially, producing significant confusion. To support formal recovery definitions, we aimed to systematically identify recovery elements that are central to those in recovery and shared regardless of subgroup/pathway.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were from the What is Recovery? Study, involving a diverse, national, online survey of people in recovery (N = 9341). Surveys included a 35-item recovery measure reflecting 4 domains; participants reported whether or not each element definitely belonged in their recovery definitions. Analyses examined item endorsements overall and among 30 subgroups defined <i>a priori</i> (by sociodemographics, substance use characteristics, and help-seeking history) to determine where items met study-specific centrality thresholds (ie, endorsement by ⩾80% and top-10 ranking, by endorsement level). We then classified items as \\\"core\\\" if meeting centrality thresholds both overall and for all 30 subgroups, and \\\"prevalent\\\" if meeting centrality thresholds overall and for 26 to 29 subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four \\\"core\\\" recovery elements emerged, including a process of growth or development; being honest with oneself; taking responsibility for the things one can change; and reacting in a more balanced way. Four \\\"prevalent\\\" recovery elements also emerged, referencing the ability to enjoy life and handle negative feelings without substance use; abstinence and/or nonproblematic substance use; and living a life that contributes. Subgroups differing most in their endorsements included those reporting mild/moderate SUD severity; non-abstinent recovery; and no specialty treatment or mutual-help group attendance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recovery elements identified here partially reflect some stakeholder definitions, but offer greater specificity and include novel elements (eg, personal integrity). Elements may point to areas of functioning that are damaged in the addiction process and can support an addiction-free life. Findings should inform institutional recovery definitions; SUD services and research; and communications about recovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"11782218231199372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f4/91/10.1177_11782218231199372.PMC10508054.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11782218231199372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11782218231199372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:药物使用障碍(SUD)的解决通常涉及一个长期、全面的变化过程,现在被广泛称为“恢复”。然而,恢复的定义差异很大,造成了严重的混乱。为了支持正式的恢复定义,我们旨在系统地识别恢复元素,这些恢复元素是恢复中的核心,并且无论子组/路径如何都是共享的。方法:数据来自What is recovery?这项研究涉及一项针对康复人群的全国性在线调查(N = 9341)。调查包括反映4个领域的35项恢复措施;参与者报告了每个元素是否明确属于他们的恢复定义。分析对项目背书进行了总体检查,并在先验定义的30个亚组中(通过社会人口统计学、物质使用特征和求助史)确定项目在哪些方面符合研究特定的中心性阈值(即,80%的背书和前10名的背书水平)。然后,如果总体上和所有30个亚组都达到中心性阈值,我们将项目分类为“核心”,如果整体上和26至29个亚组达到中心性门限,我们将其分类为“普遍”。结果:出现了四个“核心”恢复要素,包括成长或发展过程;对自己诚实;对自己可以改变的事情负责;并以更平衡的方式进行反应。还出现了四个“普遍”的恢复要素,即在不使用物质的情况下享受生活和处理负面情绪的能力;禁欲和/或非问题药物使用;过着有贡献的生活。背书差异最大的亚组包括报告轻度/中度SUD严重程度的亚组;非禁欲康复;没有特殊治疗或互助小组参与。结论:这里确定的恢复要素部分反映了一些利益相关者的定义,但提供了更大的特异性,并包括新的要素(如个人诚信)。元素可能指向在成瘾过程中受损的功能区域,并可以支持无成瘾生活。调查结果应为机构恢复的定义提供依据;SUD服务和研究;以及关于恢复的通信。
Understanding the Shared Meaning of Recovery From Substance Use Disorders: New Findings From the What is Recovery? Study.
Background: Substance use disorder (SUD) resolution typically involves a long-term, comprehensive process of change now widely referred to as "recovery." Yet, definitions of recovery vary substantially, producing significant confusion. To support formal recovery definitions, we aimed to systematically identify recovery elements that are central to those in recovery and shared regardless of subgroup/pathway.
Methods: Data were from the What is Recovery? Study, involving a diverse, national, online survey of people in recovery (N = 9341). Surveys included a 35-item recovery measure reflecting 4 domains; participants reported whether or not each element definitely belonged in their recovery definitions. Analyses examined item endorsements overall and among 30 subgroups defined a priori (by sociodemographics, substance use characteristics, and help-seeking history) to determine where items met study-specific centrality thresholds (ie, endorsement by ⩾80% and top-10 ranking, by endorsement level). We then classified items as "core" if meeting centrality thresholds both overall and for all 30 subgroups, and "prevalent" if meeting centrality thresholds overall and for 26 to 29 subgroups.
Results: Four "core" recovery elements emerged, including a process of growth or development; being honest with oneself; taking responsibility for the things one can change; and reacting in a more balanced way. Four "prevalent" recovery elements also emerged, referencing the ability to enjoy life and handle negative feelings without substance use; abstinence and/or nonproblematic substance use; and living a life that contributes. Subgroups differing most in their endorsements included those reporting mild/moderate SUD severity; non-abstinent recovery; and no specialty treatment or mutual-help group attendance.
Conclusions: Recovery elements identified here partially reflect some stakeholder definitions, but offer greater specificity and include novel elements (eg, personal integrity). Elements may point to areas of functioning that are damaged in the addiction process and can support an addiction-free life. Findings should inform institutional recovery definitions; SUD services and research; and communications about recovery.