一项旨在了解爱尔兰狗福利组织作用的混合方法调查,包括报告的挑战和潜在解决方案。

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Claire McKernan, Catherine Lawler, Blain Murphy, Daniel M Collins, Simon J More, Sean Murray, Patricia Reilly, Rob Doyle, Natascha V Meunier, Aiden Maguire, Locksley L McV Messam
{"title":"一项旨在了解爱尔兰狗福利组织作用的混合方法调查,包括报告的挑战和潜在解决方案。","authors":"Claire McKernan, Catherine Lawler, Blain Murphy, Daniel M Collins, Simon J More, Sean Murray, Patricia Reilly, Rob Doyle, Natascha V Meunier, Aiden Maguire, Locksley L McV Messam","doi":"10.1186/s13620-023-00249-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This novel study forms part of a larger research programme seeking an improved understanding of aspects of the owned dog population in Ireland. Dog welfare organisations (DWOs) in Ireland are recognised as an instrumental pillar of the animal welfare sector with some receiving substantial public funding. We conducted a survey of DWOs in Ireland (n = 39) to gain a better understanding of their role and function, including their policies and procedures and the rehoming of dogs to other regions. In addition, we wanted to get a better understanding of the challenges experienced by DWOs in fulfilling their role and their perspectives on potential solutions to these challenges. The survey questions consisted of closed and open-ended items. Closed items were analysed quantitively; open-ended items were analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most DWOs (> 80%) had written protocols for important welfare actions including rehoming procedures, assessment of owner suitability and euthanasia. DWOs sent dogs to Northern Ireland (13%), Great Britain (38.5%) and to other countries outside the United Kingdom (36%, including Germany, Sweden, Italy, the Netherlands and Czechia). Reported challenges included a general lack of funding, limited public awareness of the importance of dog welfare and insufficient capacity to handle dog numbers. To address these challenges, the DWOs highlighted the potential contribution of subsidised programmes and access to resources to educate potential owners. In a further qualitative evaluation to capture perceptions of appropriate solutions by DWOs, several themes emerged, relating to legislation, education, an overwhelmed workforce, and funding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides important insights into the roles and functions of DWOs and challenges they experience in Ireland. It is hoped that the findings from this research will inform future research investigating potential solutions to these challenges as well as the development of policy in Ireland.</p>","PeriodicalId":54916,"journal":{"name":"Irish Veterinary Journal","volume":"76 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10542677/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A mixed-method survey to understand the role of dog welfare organisations in Ireland, including reported challenges and potential solutions.\",\"authors\":\"Claire McKernan, Catherine Lawler, Blain Murphy, Daniel M Collins, Simon J More, Sean Murray, Patricia Reilly, Rob Doyle, Natascha V Meunier, Aiden Maguire, Locksley L McV Messam\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13620-023-00249-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This novel study forms part of a larger research programme seeking an improved understanding of aspects of the owned dog population in Ireland. Dog welfare organisations (DWOs) in Ireland are recognised as an instrumental pillar of the animal welfare sector with some receiving substantial public funding. We conducted a survey of DWOs in Ireland (n = 39) to gain a better understanding of their role and function, including their policies and procedures and the rehoming of dogs to other regions. In addition, we wanted to get a better understanding of the challenges experienced by DWOs in fulfilling their role and their perspectives on potential solutions to these challenges. The survey questions consisted of closed and open-ended items. Closed items were analysed quantitively; open-ended items were analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most DWOs (> 80%) had written protocols for important welfare actions including rehoming procedures, assessment of owner suitability and euthanasia. DWOs sent dogs to Northern Ireland (13%), Great Britain (38.5%) and to other countries outside the United Kingdom (36%, including Germany, Sweden, Italy, the Netherlands and Czechia). Reported challenges included a general lack of funding, limited public awareness of the importance of dog welfare and insufficient capacity to handle dog numbers. To address these challenges, the DWOs highlighted the potential contribution of subsidised programmes and access to resources to educate potential owners. In a further qualitative evaluation to capture perceptions of appropriate solutions by DWOs, several themes emerged, relating to legislation, education, an overwhelmed workforce, and funding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides important insights into the roles and functions of DWOs and challenges they experience in Ireland. It is hoped that the findings from this research will inform future research investigating potential solutions to these challenges as well as the development of policy in Ireland.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irish Veterinary Journal\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10542677/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irish Veterinary Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13620-023-00249-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13620-023-00249-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:这项新颖的研究是一项更大的研究计划的一部分,该计划旨在更好地了解爱尔兰养狗群体的各个方面。爱尔兰的狗福利组织(DWO)被公认为动物福利部门的重要支柱,其中一些组织获得了大量公共资金。我们对爱尔兰的DWO进行了调查(n = 39)更好地了解它们的作用和功能,包括它们的政策和程序以及将狗安置到其他地区。此外,我们希望更好地了解DWO在履行职责过程中遇到的挑战,以及他们对这些挑战的潜在解决方案的看法。调查问题包括封闭式和开放式项目。对关闭的项目进行了定量分析;开放式项目按主题进行分析。结果:大多数DWO(> 80%)制定了重要福利行动的书面协议,包括安置程序、业主适合性评估和安乐死。DWO将狗送往北爱尔兰(13%)、英国(38.5%)和英国以外的其他国家(36%,包括德国、瑞典、意大利、荷兰和捷克)。报告的挑战包括普遍缺乏资金,公众对狗福利重要性的认识有限,以及处理狗数量的能力不足。为了应对这些挑战,DWO强调了补贴计划的潜在贡献,以及获得资源来教育潜在所有者的机会。在进一步的定性评估中,为了捕捉DWO对适当解决方案的看法,出现了几个主题,涉及立法、教育、不堪重负的劳动力和资金。结论:这项研究为DWO的作用和职能以及他们在爱尔兰面临的挑战提供了重要的见解。希望这项研究的发现将为未来的研究提供信息,调查这些挑战的潜在解决方案,以及爱尔兰的政策发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A mixed-method survey to understand the role of dog welfare organisations in Ireland, including reported challenges and potential solutions.

Background: This novel study forms part of a larger research programme seeking an improved understanding of aspects of the owned dog population in Ireland. Dog welfare organisations (DWOs) in Ireland are recognised as an instrumental pillar of the animal welfare sector with some receiving substantial public funding. We conducted a survey of DWOs in Ireland (n = 39) to gain a better understanding of their role and function, including their policies and procedures and the rehoming of dogs to other regions. In addition, we wanted to get a better understanding of the challenges experienced by DWOs in fulfilling their role and their perspectives on potential solutions to these challenges. The survey questions consisted of closed and open-ended items. Closed items were analysed quantitively; open-ended items were analysed thematically.

Results: Most DWOs (> 80%) had written protocols for important welfare actions including rehoming procedures, assessment of owner suitability and euthanasia. DWOs sent dogs to Northern Ireland (13%), Great Britain (38.5%) and to other countries outside the United Kingdom (36%, including Germany, Sweden, Italy, the Netherlands and Czechia). Reported challenges included a general lack of funding, limited public awareness of the importance of dog welfare and insufficient capacity to handle dog numbers. To address these challenges, the DWOs highlighted the potential contribution of subsidised programmes and access to resources to educate potential owners. In a further qualitative evaluation to capture perceptions of appropriate solutions by DWOs, several themes emerged, relating to legislation, education, an overwhelmed workforce, and funding.

Conclusions: This study provides important insights into the roles and functions of DWOs and challenges they experience in Ireland. It is hoped that the findings from this research will inform future research investigating potential solutions to these challenges as well as the development of policy in Ireland.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Irish Veterinary Journal
Irish Veterinary Journal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
1
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Irish Veterinary Journal is an open access journal with a vision to make a substantial contribution to the dissemination of evidence-based knowledge that will promote optimal health and welfare of both domestic and wild species of animals. Irish Veterinary Journal has a clinical research focus with an emphasis on the effective management of health in both individual and populations of animals. Published studies will be relevant to both the international veterinary profession and veterinary scientists. Papers relating to veterinary education, veterinary ethics, veterinary public health, or relevant studies in the area of social science (participatory research) are also within the scope of Irish Veterinary Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信