第三代抗惊厥药物治疗脑卒中后癫痫中苯二氮卓类难治性癫痫:一项基于观察的回顾性研究。

IF 7.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CNS drugs Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-02 DOI:10.1007/s40263-023-01039-y
Yaroslav Winter, Katharina Sandner, Thomas Vieth, Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla, Sebastian V Stuckrad-Barre, Sergiu Groppa
{"title":"第三代抗惊厥药物治疗脑卒中后癫痫中苯二氮卓类难治性癫痫:一项基于观察的回顾性研究。","authors":"Yaroslav Winter,&nbsp;Katharina Sandner,&nbsp;Thomas Vieth,&nbsp;Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla,&nbsp;Sebastian V Stuckrad-Barre,&nbsp;Sergiu Groppa","doi":"10.1007/s40263-023-01039-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy is a challenging condition because of multiple vascular comorbidities and the advanced age of patients. Data on third-generation antiseizure medication (ASM) in this condition are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of third-generation ASMs in the second- or third-line therapy of benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy following acute ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on the effectiveness of third-generation ASMs in patients with status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy were gathered from two German Stroke Registries and the Mainz Epilepsy Registry. We included only cases with epilepsy remote to the ischemic event. No patients with acute symptomatic seizures were included. The following third-generation ASMs were included: brivaracetam, lacosamide, eslicarbazepine, perampanel, topiramate, and zonisamide. The assessment of effectiveness was based on seizure freedom within 48 h since the start of therapy with the respective ASM. Seizure freedom was evaluated both clinically (clinical evaluation at least three times per day) and by daily electroencephalogram records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 138 patients aged 70.8 ± 8.1 years with benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus in ischemic poststroke epilepsy, 33 (23.9%) were treated with lacosamide, 24 (17.4%) with brivaracetam, 23 (16.7%) with eslicarbazepine, 21 (15.2%) with perampanel, 20 (14.5%) with topiramate, and 17 (12.3%) with zonisamide. Seizure freedom within 48 h was achieved in 66.7% of patients with lacosamide, 65.2% with eslicarbazepine, 38.1% with perampanel, 37.5% with brivaracetam, 35.0% with topiramate, and 35.3% with zonisamide (p < 0.05 for comparison of lacosamide or eslicarbazepine to other ASMs).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on these data, lacosamide and eslicarbazepine might be more favorable in the treatment of refractory status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy, when administered as second- or third-line ASMs before anesthesia. Because of the fact that these ASMs share the same mechanism of action (slow inactivation of sodium channels), our findings could motivate further research on the role that this pharmaceutical mechanism of action has in the treatment of poststroke epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05267405).</p>","PeriodicalId":10508,"journal":{"name":"CNS drugs","volume":" ","pages":"929-936"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9d/e2/40263_2023_Article_1039.PMC10570217.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Third-Generation Antiseizure Medication in the Treatment of Benzodiazepine-Refractory Status Epilepticus in Poststroke Epilepsy: A Retrospective Observational Register-Based Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yaroslav Winter,&nbsp;Katharina Sandner,&nbsp;Thomas Vieth,&nbsp;Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla,&nbsp;Sebastian V Stuckrad-Barre,&nbsp;Sergiu Groppa\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40263-023-01039-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy is a challenging condition because of multiple vascular comorbidities and the advanced age of patients. Data on third-generation antiseizure medication (ASM) in this condition are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of third-generation ASMs in the second- or third-line therapy of benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy following acute ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on the effectiveness of third-generation ASMs in patients with status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy were gathered from two German Stroke Registries and the Mainz Epilepsy Registry. We included only cases with epilepsy remote to the ischemic event. No patients with acute symptomatic seizures were included. The following third-generation ASMs were included: brivaracetam, lacosamide, eslicarbazepine, perampanel, topiramate, and zonisamide. The assessment of effectiveness was based on seizure freedom within 48 h since the start of therapy with the respective ASM. Seizure freedom was evaluated both clinically (clinical evaluation at least three times per day) and by daily electroencephalogram records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 138 patients aged 70.8 ± 8.1 years with benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus in ischemic poststroke epilepsy, 33 (23.9%) were treated with lacosamide, 24 (17.4%) with brivaracetam, 23 (16.7%) with eslicarbazepine, 21 (15.2%) with perampanel, 20 (14.5%) with topiramate, and 17 (12.3%) with zonisamide. Seizure freedom within 48 h was achieved in 66.7% of patients with lacosamide, 65.2% with eslicarbazepine, 38.1% with perampanel, 37.5% with brivaracetam, 35.0% with topiramate, and 35.3% with zonisamide (p < 0.05 for comparison of lacosamide or eslicarbazepine to other ASMs).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on these data, lacosamide and eslicarbazepine might be more favorable in the treatment of refractory status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy, when administered as second- or third-line ASMs before anesthesia. Because of the fact that these ASMs share the same mechanism of action (slow inactivation of sodium channels), our findings could motivate further research on the role that this pharmaceutical mechanism of action has in the treatment of poststroke epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05267405).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CNS drugs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"929-936\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9d/e2/40263_2023_Article_1039.PMC10570217.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CNS drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-023-01039-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CNS drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-023-01039-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:脑卒中后癫痫的癫痫持续状态是一种具有挑战性的情况,因为患者患有多种血管合并症和高龄。关于这种情况下的第三代抗癫痫药物(ASM)的数据有限。本研究的目的是评估第三代ASM在急性缺血性卒中后卒中后癫痫的苯二氮卓类难治性癫痫持续状态的二线或三线治疗中的疗效。方法:从两个德国卒中登记处和美因茨癫痫登记处收集第三代ASM对卒中后癫痫持续状态患者的有效性数据。我们只纳入了缺血性事件以外的癫痫病例。没有包括急性症状性癫痫发作的患者。包括以下第三代ASM:溴拉西坦、拉沙酰胺、依斯卡巴zepine、perampanel、托吡酯和唑尼酰胺。有效性评估基于自开始使用相应ASM治疗后48小时内的癫痫发作自由度。对癫痫发作自由度进行临床评估(每天至少三次临床评估)和每日脑电图记录。结果:在138例年龄为70.8±8.1岁的缺血性脑卒中后癫痫患者中,33例(23.9%)接受了拉沙酰胺治疗,24例(17.4%)接受了布拉西坦治疗,23例(16.7%)接受埃斯利卡巴zepine治疗,21例(15.2%)接受帕帕奈治疗,20例(14.5%)接受托吡酯治疗,17例(12.3%)接受唑尼酰胺治疗。66.7%的患者在48小时内无癫痫发作,65.2%的患者在服用拉沙酰胺时无癫痫发作;38.1%的患者在使用帕帕奈时无癫痫发生;37.5%的患者使用溴拉西坦时无癫痫发病;35.0%的患者使用托吡酯时无癫痫发生;35.3%的患者使用唑硝胺时无癫痫(与其他ASM相比,p<0.05)。结论:根据这些数据,当在麻醉前作为二线或三线ASM给药时,lacosamide和eslicarbazepine可能更有利于治疗卒中后癫痫的难治性癫痫持续状态。由于这些ASM具有相同的作用机制(钠通道的缓慢失活),我们的发现可以推动对这种药物作用机制在治疗中风后癫痫中的作用的进一步研究。临床试验注册:本研究注册于ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT05267405)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Third-Generation Antiseizure Medication in the Treatment of Benzodiazepine-Refractory Status Epilepticus in Poststroke Epilepsy: A Retrospective Observational Register-Based Study.

Background and objective: Status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy is a challenging condition because of multiple vascular comorbidities and the advanced age of patients. Data on third-generation antiseizure medication (ASM) in this condition are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of third-generation ASMs in the second- or third-line therapy of benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy following acute ischemic stroke.

Methods: Data on the effectiveness of third-generation ASMs in patients with status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy were gathered from two German Stroke Registries and the Mainz Epilepsy Registry. We included only cases with epilepsy remote to the ischemic event. No patients with acute symptomatic seizures were included. The following third-generation ASMs were included: brivaracetam, lacosamide, eslicarbazepine, perampanel, topiramate, and zonisamide. The assessment of effectiveness was based on seizure freedom within 48 h since the start of therapy with the respective ASM. Seizure freedom was evaluated both clinically (clinical evaluation at least three times per day) and by daily electroencephalogram records.

Results: Of the 138 patients aged 70.8 ± 8.1 years with benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus in ischemic poststroke epilepsy, 33 (23.9%) were treated with lacosamide, 24 (17.4%) with brivaracetam, 23 (16.7%) with eslicarbazepine, 21 (15.2%) with perampanel, 20 (14.5%) with topiramate, and 17 (12.3%) with zonisamide. Seizure freedom within 48 h was achieved in 66.7% of patients with lacosamide, 65.2% with eslicarbazepine, 38.1% with perampanel, 37.5% with brivaracetam, 35.0% with topiramate, and 35.3% with zonisamide (p < 0.05 for comparison of lacosamide or eslicarbazepine to other ASMs).

Conclusions: Based on these data, lacosamide and eslicarbazepine might be more favorable in the treatment of refractory status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy, when administered as second- or third-line ASMs before anesthesia. Because of the fact that these ASMs share the same mechanism of action (slow inactivation of sodium channels), our findings could motivate further research on the role that this pharmaceutical mechanism of action has in the treatment of poststroke epilepsy.

Clinical trial registration: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05267405).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CNS drugs
CNS drugs 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: CNS Drugs promotes rational pharmacotherapy within the disciplines of clinical psychiatry and neurology. The Journal includes: - Overviews of contentious or emerging issues. - Comprehensive narrative reviews that provide an authoritative source of information on pharmacological approaches to managing neurological and psychiatric illnesses. - Systematic reviews that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. - Adis Drug Reviews of the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established drugs in neurology and psychiatry. - Original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies with a strong link to clinical practice, such as clinical pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies, clinical trials, meta-analyses, outcomes research, and pharmacoeconomic and pharmacoepidemiological studies. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in CNS Drugs may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信