Pierrick Le Borgne, Karine Alamé, Aline Chenou, Anne Hoffmann, Véronique Burger, Sabrina Kepka, Pascal Bilbault, Quentin Le Bastard, Maelle Martin, Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou
{"title":"法国急诊科气管插管期间的培训方法和设备使用情况:一项全国性调查。","authors":"Pierrick Le Borgne, Karine Alamé, Aline Chenou, Anne Hoffmann, Véronique Burger, Sabrina Kepka, Pascal Bilbault, Quentin Le Bastard, Maelle Martin, Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and importance: </strong>Endotracheal intubation is a lifesaving procedure that is reportedly associated to a significant risk of adverse events. Recent trials have reported that the use of videolaryngoscope and of a stylet might limit this risk during emergency intubation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to provide a national description of intubation practices in French Emergency Departments (EDs).</p><p><strong>Settings and participants: </strong>We conducted an online nationwide survey by sending an anonymous 37-item questionnaire via e-mail to 629 physicians in French EDs between 2020 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>A single questionnaire was sent to a sole referent physician in each ED.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and analysis: </strong>The primary endpoint was to assess the proportion of French EDs in which videolaryngoscopy was available for emergency intubation and its use in routine practice. Secondary endpoints included the presence of local protocol or standard of procedure for intubation, availability of capnography, and routine use of a stylet.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Of the surveyed EDs, 342 (54.4%) returned the completed questionnaire. A videolaryngoscope was available in 193 (56%) EDs, and direct laryngoscopy without a stylet was majorly used as the primary approach in 280 (82%) EDs. Among the participating EDs, 74% had an established protocol for intubation and 92% provided a capnography device for routine verification of tube position. In cases of difficult intubation, the use of a bougie was recommended in 227 (81%) EDs, and a switch to a videolaryngoscope in 16 (6%) EDs. The most frequently used videolaryngoscope models were McGrath Mac Airtraq (51%), followed by Airtraq (41%), and Glidescope (14%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this large French survey, the majority of EDs recommended direct laryngoscopy without stylet, with seldom use of videolaryngoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Training approaches and devices utilization during endotracheal intubation in French Emergency Departments: a nationwide survey.\",\"authors\":\"Pierrick Le Borgne, Karine Alamé, Aline Chenou, Anne Hoffmann, Véronique Burger, Sabrina Kepka, Pascal Bilbault, Quentin Le Bastard, Maelle Martin, Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and importance: </strong>Endotracheal intubation is a lifesaving procedure that is reportedly associated to a significant risk of adverse events. Recent trials have reported that the use of videolaryngoscope and of a stylet might limit this risk during emergency intubation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to provide a national description of intubation practices in French Emergency Departments (EDs).</p><p><strong>Settings and participants: </strong>We conducted an online nationwide survey by sending an anonymous 37-item questionnaire via e-mail to 629 physicians in French EDs between 2020 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>A single questionnaire was sent to a sole referent physician in each ED.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and analysis: </strong>The primary endpoint was to assess the proportion of French EDs in which videolaryngoscopy was available for emergency intubation and its use in routine practice. Secondary endpoints included the presence of local protocol or standard of procedure for intubation, availability of capnography, and routine use of a stylet.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Of the surveyed EDs, 342 (54.4%) returned the completed questionnaire. A videolaryngoscope was available in 193 (56%) EDs, and direct laryngoscopy without a stylet was majorly used as the primary approach in 280 (82%) EDs. Among the participating EDs, 74% had an established protocol for intubation and 92% provided a capnography device for routine verification of tube position. In cases of difficult intubation, the use of a bougie was recommended in 227 (81%) EDs, and a switch to a videolaryngoscope in 16 (6%) EDs. The most frequently used videolaryngoscope models were McGrath Mac Airtraq (51%), followed by Airtraq (41%), and Glidescope (14%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this large French survey, the majority of EDs recommended direct laryngoscopy without stylet, with seldom use of videolaryngoscopy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001091\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001091","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和重要性:据报道,气管插管是一种挽救生命的程序,与不良事件的重大风险有关。最近的试验报告称,在紧急插管期间,使用视频喉镜和探针可能会限制这种风险。目的:本研究的目的是提供法国急诊科插管实践的全国性描述。设置和参与者:我们在2020年至2022年间通过电子邮件向629名法国急诊科医生发送了一份匿名的37项问卷,在全国范围内进行了一项在线调查。干预:向每个急诊科的唯一参考医生发送一份单份问卷。结果测量和分析:主要终点是评估法国急诊科中使用视频喉镜检查的比例可用于紧急插管及其在常规实践中的使用。次要终点包括是否存在插管的局部方案或程序标准、是否有二氧化碳描记图以及探针的常规使用。主要结果:在接受调查的ED中,342人(54.4%)返回了完整的问卷。193例(56%)ED使用了视频喉镜,280例(82%)ED主要使用无探针的直接喉镜作为主要方法。在参与的ED中,74%的ED有既定的插管方案,92%的ED提供了用于常规验证导管位置的capography设备。在插管困难的情况下,227例(81%)ED建议使用探条,16例(6%)ED建议改用视频喉镜。最常用的视频喉镜型号是McGrath Mac Airtraq(51%),其次是Airtraq和Glidescope(14%)。结论:在法国的这项大型调查中,大多数ED建议不使用探针直接喉镜检查,很少使用视频喉镜检查。
Training approaches and devices utilization during endotracheal intubation in French Emergency Departments: a nationwide survey.
Background and importance: Endotracheal intubation is a lifesaving procedure that is reportedly associated to a significant risk of adverse events. Recent trials have reported that the use of videolaryngoscope and of a stylet might limit this risk during emergency intubation.
Objectives: The objective of this study was to provide a national description of intubation practices in French Emergency Departments (EDs).
Settings and participants: We conducted an online nationwide survey by sending an anonymous 37-item questionnaire via e-mail to 629 physicians in French EDs between 2020 and 2022.
Intervention: A single questionnaire was sent to a sole referent physician in each ED.
Outcome measures and analysis: The primary endpoint was to assess the proportion of French EDs in which videolaryngoscopy was available for emergency intubation and its use in routine practice. Secondary endpoints included the presence of local protocol or standard of procedure for intubation, availability of capnography, and routine use of a stylet.
Main results: Of the surveyed EDs, 342 (54.4%) returned the completed questionnaire. A videolaryngoscope was available in 193 (56%) EDs, and direct laryngoscopy without a stylet was majorly used as the primary approach in 280 (82%) EDs. Among the participating EDs, 74% had an established protocol for intubation and 92% provided a capnography device for routine verification of tube position. In cases of difficult intubation, the use of a bougie was recommended in 227 (81%) EDs, and a switch to a videolaryngoscope in 16 (6%) EDs. The most frequently used videolaryngoscope models were McGrath Mac Airtraq (51%), followed by Airtraq (41%), and Glidescope (14%).
Conclusion: In this large French survey, the majority of EDs recommended direct laryngoscopy without stylet, with seldom use of videolaryngoscopy.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Emergency Medicine is the official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine. It is devoted to serving the European emergency medicine community and to promoting European standards of training, diagnosis and care in this rapidly growing field.
Published bimonthly, the Journal offers original papers on all aspects of acute injury and sudden illness, including: emergency medicine, anaesthesiology, cardiology, disaster medicine, intensive care, internal medicine, orthopaedics, paediatrics, toxicology and trauma care. It addresses issues on the organization of emergency services in hospitals and in the community and examines postgraduate training from European and global perspectives. The Journal also publishes papers focusing on the different models of emergency healthcare delivery in Europe and beyond. With a multidisciplinary approach, the European Journal of Emergency Medicine publishes scientific research, topical reviews, news of meetings and events of interest to the emergency medicine community.
Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.