与男性发生性关系的男性在进行肛门自我或同伴检查时焦虑程度较低,几乎没有障碍:预防肛门癌症触诊研究的定性研究。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Culture, Health & Sexuality Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-09 DOI:10.1080/13691058.2023.2263500
Rey A Flores, J Michael Wilkerson, Andrew Travis, Ellen Almirol, DeJuan Washington, Lou Weaver, Cameron Liebert, Elizabeth Chiao, Aniruddha Hazra, Alan G Nyitray
{"title":"与男性发生性关系的男性在进行肛门自我或同伴检查时焦虑程度较低,几乎没有障碍:预防肛门癌症触诊研究的定性研究。","authors":"Rey A Flores, J Michael Wilkerson, Andrew Travis, Ellen Almirol, DeJuan Washington, Lou Weaver, Cameron Liebert, Elizabeth Chiao, Aniruddha Hazra, Alan G Nyitray","doi":"10.1080/13691058.2023.2263500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While rare in the larger population, anal cancer incidence is significantly higher in groups such as sexual minority men and people living with HIV. This qualitative analysis examined participants' experiences and perceptions of barriers to anal self-examination and anal companion examination through interviews completed as a part of a larger clinical trial. Interviews were conducted online with participants (<i>n</i> = 131) within a week of their baseline appointment between January 2020 and October 2021. Content analysis denoted participants' thoughts and perceptions about anal self-examination and anal companion examinations. Of the 131 cisgender men interviewed (mean age 49.9 years, <i>SD</i> 12.7), 92.4% identified as gay, 54.9% identified as white, 22.1% identified as Black, 19.9% identified as Latino, and 44.3% of participants were living with HIV. Participants did not report feelings of excessive anxiety when an abnormality was detected. However, three salient themes emerged as to why participants may not perform an anal self-examination or anal companion examination: (1) physical limitation(s), (2) potential sexualisation of the examination, and (3) level of comfort discussing anal health. Future work must continue to explore methods that not only decrease stigma surrounding anal health but also bolster feelings of accessibility to perform self and couple examinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10799,"journal":{"name":"Culture, Health & Sexuality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11001786/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Men who have sex with men experience low anxiety and few barriers to performing anal self or companion examinations: a qualitative study of the Prevent Anal Cancer Palpation Study.\",\"authors\":\"Rey A Flores, J Michael Wilkerson, Andrew Travis, Ellen Almirol, DeJuan Washington, Lou Weaver, Cameron Liebert, Elizabeth Chiao, Aniruddha Hazra, Alan G Nyitray\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13691058.2023.2263500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While rare in the larger population, anal cancer incidence is significantly higher in groups such as sexual minority men and people living with HIV. This qualitative analysis examined participants' experiences and perceptions of barriers to anal self-examination and anal companion examination through interviews completed as a part of a larger clinical trial. Interviews were conducted online with participants (<i>n</i> = 131) within a week of their baseline appointment between January 2020 and October 2021. Content analysis denoted participants' thoughts and perceptions about anal self-examination and anal companion examinations. Of the 131 cisgender men interviewed (mean age 49.9 years, <i>SD</i> 12.7), 92.4% identified as gay, 54.9% identified as white, 22.1% identified as Black, 19.9% identified as Latino, and 44.3% of participants were living with HIV. Participants did not report feelings of excessive anxiety when an abnormality was detected. However, three salient themes emerged as to why participants may not perform an anal self-examination or anal companion examination: (1) physical limitation(s), (2) potential sexualisation of the examination, and (3) level of comfort discussing anal health. Future work must continue to explore methods that not only decrease stigma surrounding anal health but also bolster feelings of accessibility to perform self and couple examinations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Culture, Health & Sexuality\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11001786/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Culture, Health & Sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2023.2263500\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture, Health & Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2023.2263500","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然在较大的人群中很罕见,但在性少数群体男性和艾滋病毒感染者等群体中,肛门癌症的发病率要高得多。这项定性分析通过作为大型临床试验一部分完成的访谈,考察了参与者对肛门自我检查和肛门伴随检查障碍的体验和看法。对参与者(n = 131)在2020年1月至2021年10月的基线任命后一周内。内容分析表示了参与者对肛门自我检查和肛门伴随检查的想法和看法。131名接受采访的顺性别男性(平均年龄49.9岁) 年龄,SD 12.7),92.4%被认定为同性恋,54.9%被认定为白人,22.1%被认定为黑人,19.9%被认定是拉丁裔,44.3%的参与者感染了艾滋病毒。当检测到异常时,参与者没有报告过度焦虑的感觉。然而,关于参与者为什么可能不进行肛门自检或肛门伴随检查,出现了三个突出的主题:(1)身体限制,(2)检查的潜在性化,以及(3)讨论肛门健康的舒适度。未来的工作必须继续探索方法,不仅可以减少围绕肛门健康的污名,还可以增强进行自我和夫妻检查的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Men who have sex with men experience low anxiety and few barriers to performing anal self or companion examinations: a qualitative study of the Prevent Anal Cancer Palpation Study.

While rare in the larger population, anal cancer incidence is significantly higher in groups such as sexual minority men and people living with HIV. This qualitative analysis examined participants' experiences and perceptions of barriers to anal self-examination and anal companion examination through interviews completed as a part of a larger clinical trial. Interviews were conducted online with participants (n = 131) within a week of their baseline appointment between January 2020 and October 2021. Content analysis denoted participants' thoughts and perceptions about anal self-examination and anal companion examinations. Of the 131 cisgender men interviewed (mean age 49.9 years, SD 12.7), 92.4% identified as gay, 54.9% identified as white, 22.1% identified as Black, 19.9% identified as Latino, and 44.3% of participants were living with HIV. Participants did not report feelings of excessive anxiety when an abnormality was detected. However, three salient themes emerged as to why participants may not perform an anal self-examination or anal companion examination: (1) physical limitation(s), (2) potential sexualisation of the examination, and (3) level of comfort discussing anal health. Future work must continue to explore methods that not only decrease stigma surrounding anal health but also bolster feelings of accessibility to perform self and couple examinations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
80
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信