Craig White, Winghan Jacqueline Kwong, Hilary Armstrong, Michael Behling, Jeffrey Niemira, Kathy Lang
{"title":"美国食品药品监督管理局批准的3种治疗纤维肌痛药物的真实用药模式分析。","authors":"Craig White, Winghan Jacqueline Kwong, Hilary Armstrong, Michael Behling, Jeffrey Niemira, Kathy Lang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fibromyalgia is a chronic condition characterized by widespread pain, fatigue, and sleep disturbances that affects approximately 2% to 4% of the adult population in the United States, with minimal real-world data related to the use of medications and associated dosages for this condition.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the real-world dosing patterns of the 3 medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for fibromyalgia-pregabalin, duloxetine, and milnacipran.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using QuintilesIMS' (now IQVIA) electronic medical record data linked to administrative claims, we identified adults with fibromyalgia who were newly prescribed pregabalin, duloxetine, or milnacipran between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2014. We summarized and compared the starting and maximum doses with United States prescribing information (USPI) dosing recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 1043 patients who were receiving pregabalin, 1281 receiving duloxetine, and 326 patients receiving milnacipran with similar age and comorbidity profiles were included in the study. The mean starting dose was 176 mg daily, 56 mg daily, and 95 mg daily for pregabalin, duloxetine, and milnacipran, respectively. More patients receiving pregabalin (35%) had a starting dose lower than recommended compared with patients receiving duloxetine (7%) or milnacipran (17%; <i>P</i> <.0001). Of the patients who received pregabalin, 27% had USPI-recommended maintenance dosing versus 91% of patients who received duloxetine and 80% who received milnacipran (<i>P</i> <.0001). The mean duration of treatment was longer for duloxetine (205 days; <i>P</i> <.0001) than for pregabalin (167 days) and milnacipran (167 days). The duration of using the maximum dose of each medication as a percentage of the total time of medication use was 77% for pregabalin, 84% for duloxetine, and 90% for milnacipran (<i>P</i> <.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients using pregabalin were the most likely of the 3 cohorts to receive lower than label-recommended starting doses and the least likely to receive the recommended maintenance doses during follow-up compared with those receiving duloxetine or milnacipran. Real-world prescribing patterns indicate that factors other than label recommendations may be influencing prescribed dosing.</p>","PeriodicalId":48595,"journal":{"name":"American Health and Drug Benefits","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6207316/pdf/ahdb-11-293.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Real-World Dosing Patterns for the 3 FDA-Approved Medications in the Treatment of Fibromyalgia.\",\"authors\":\"Craig White, Winghan Jacqueline Kwong, Hilary Armstrong, Michael Behling, Jeffrey Niemira, Kathy Lang\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fibromyalgia is a chronic condition characterized by widespread pain, fatigue, and sleep disturbances that affects approximately 2% to 4% of the adult population in the United States, with minimal real-world data related to the use of medications and associated dosages for this condition.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the real-world dosing patterns of the 3 medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for fibromyalgia-pregabalin, duloxetine, and milnacipran.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using QuintilesIMS' (now IQVIA) electronic medical record data linked to administrative claims, we identified adults with fibromyalgia who were newly prescribed pregabalin, duloxetine, or milnacipran between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2014. We summarized and compared the starting and maximum doses with United States prescribing information (USPI) dosing recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 1043 patients who were receiving pregabalin, 1281 receiving duloxetine, and 326 patients receiving milnacipran with similar age and comorbidity profiles were included in the study. The mean starting dose was 176 mg daily, 56 mg daily, and 95 mg daily for pregabalin, duloxetine, and milnacipran, respectively. More patients receiving pregabalin (35%) had a starting dose lower than recommended compared with patients receiving duloxetine (7%) or milnacipran (17%; <i>P</i> <.0001). Of the patients who received pregabalin, 27% had USPI-recommended maintenance dosing versus 91% of patients who received duloxetine and 80% who received milnacipran (<i>P</i> <.0001). The mean duration of treatment was longer for duloxetine (205 days; <i>P</i> <.0001) than for pregabalin (167 days) and milnacipran (167 days). The duration of using the maximum dose of each medication as a percentage of the total time of medication use was 77% for pregabalin, 84% for duloxetine, and 90% for milnacipran (<i>P</i> <.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients using pregabalin were the most likely of the 3 cohorts to receive lower than label-recommended starting doses and the least likely to receive the recommended maintenance doses during follow-up compared with those receiving duloxetine or milnacipran. Real-world prescribing patterns indicate that factors other than label recommendations may be influencing prescribed dosing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Health and Drug Benefits\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6207316/pdf/ahdb-11-293.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Health and Drug Benefits\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Health and Drug Benefits","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:纤维肌痛是一种慢性疾病,其特征是广泛的疼痛、疲劳和睡眠障碍,影响着美国约2%至4%的成年人口,与这种疾病的药物使用和相关剂量相关的真实世界数据很少。目的:分析美国食品药品监督管理局批准的3种治疗纤维肌痛的药物的真实给药模式普瑞巴林、度洛西汀和米那西普兰。方法:使用QuintilesIMS(现为IQVIA)与行政索赔相关的电子病历数据,我们确定了在2006年1月1日至2014年12月31日期间新开普瑞巴林、度洛西汀或米那西普兰处方的纤维肌痛成年人。我们总结并比较了起始剂量和最大剂量与美国处方信息(USPI)给药建议。结果:总共有1043名接受普瑞巴林治疗的患者、1281名接受度洛西汀治疗的患者和326名接受米那西普兰治疗的患者被纳入研究,这些患者的年龄和合并症情况相似。普瑞巴林、度洛西汀和米那西普兰的平均起始剂量分别为176 mg每日、56 mg每日和95 mg每日。与接受度洛西汀(7%)或米那西普兰的患者相比,更多接受普瑞巴林的患者(35%)的起始剂量低于推荐剂量(17%;P P P结论:与接受度洛西汀或米那西普兰的患者相比,在3组患者中,使用普瑞巴林的患者最有可能接受低于标签建议的起始剂量,而在随访期间接受推荐维持剂量的可能性最小床上给药。
Analysis of Real-World Dosing Patterns for the 3 FDA-Approved Medications in the Treatment of Fibromyalgia.
Background: Fibromyalgia is a chronic condition characterized by widespread pain, fatigue, and sleep disturbances that affects approximately 2% to 4% of the adult population in the United States, with minimal real-world data related to the use of medications and associated dosages for this condition.
Objective: To analyze the real-world dosing patterns of the 3 medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for fibromyalgia-pregabalin, duloxetine, and milnacipran.
Methods: Using QuintilesIMS' (now IQVIA) electronic medical record data linked to administrative claims, we identified adults with fibromyalgia who were newly prescribed pregabalin, duloxetine, or milnacipran between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2014. We summarized and compared the starting and maximum doses with United States prescribing information (USPI) dosing recommendations.
Results: In all, 1043 patients who were receiving pregabalin, 1281 receiving duloxetine, and 326 patients receiving milnacipran with similar age and comorbidity profiles were included in the study. The mean starting dose was 176 mg daily, 56 mg daily, and 95 mg daily for pregabalin, duloxetine, and milnacipran, respectively. More patients receiving pregabalin (35%) had a starting dose lower than recommended compared with patients receiving duloxetine (7%) or milnacipran (17%; P <.0001). Of the patients who received pregabalin, 27% had USPI-recommended maintenance dosing versus 91% of patients who received duloxetine and 80% who received milnacipran (P <.0001). The mean duration of treatment was longer for duloxetine (205 days; P <.0001) than for pregabalin (167 days) and milnacipran (167 days). The duration of using the maximum dose of each medication as a percentage of the total time of medication use was 77% for pregabalin, 84% for duloxetine, and 90% for milnacipran (P <.0001).
Conclusions: Patients using pregabalin were the most likely of the 3 cohorts to receive lower than label-recommended starting doses and the least likely to receive the recommended maintenance doses during follow-up compared with those receiving duloxetine or milnacipran. Real-world prescribing patterns indicate that factors other than label recommendations may be influencing prescribed dosing.
期刊介绍:
AHDB welcomes articles on clinical-, policy-, and business-related topics relevant to the integration of the forces in healthcare that affect the cost and quality of healthcare delivery, improve healthcare quality, and ultimately result in access to care, focusing on health organization structures and processes, health information, health policies, health and behavioral economics, as well as health technologies, products, and patient behaviors relevant to value-based quality of care.