{"title":"使用1类校准气体混合物进行温室气体监测的气相色谱技术内部方法验证的案例研究","authors":"Komal, Daya Soni, Shankar G. Aggarwal","doi":"10.1007/s00769-023-01552-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, analytical method validation has been done for the measurement of carbon dioxide/nitrogen (CO<sub>2</sub>/N<sub>2</sub>) and methane/nitrogen (CH<sub>4</sub>/N<sub>2</sub>) calibration gas mixtures using gas chromatography with flame ionization detector (GC-FID). Class-I calibration gas mixtures (CGMs) of CO<sub>2</sub> (500 µmol mol<sup>−1</sup> to 1100 µmol mol<sup>−1</sup>) and CH<sub>4</sub> (2 µmol mol<sup>−1</sup> to 130 µmol mol<sup>−1</sup>) used in method validation process has been prepared gravimetrically following ISO 6142-1. All prepared gas mixtures have expanded uncertainty 1 % at coverage factor (<i>k</i>) of 2 with 95 % confidence. The following parameters are chosen for this case study which include selectivity, accuracy, precision, linearity, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), robustness, stability, and uncertainty. Different statistical approaches are taken into consideration for each parameter assessment. The results indicate that GC-FID is selective for CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub>. CGMs represent good repeatability and reproducibility having percentage relative deviation < 1 % among measurements. A good linear behaviour was observed for CGMs of CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> on basis of least square regression with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> value 0.9995 and 1, respectively. LOD and LOQ for CH<sub>4</sub> are calculated 0.47 and 1.59 µmol mol<sup>−1</sup> based on signal-to-noise ratio by taking its lowest concentration of 2.9 µmol mol<sup>−1</sup>. The in-house validated method for GC-FID using CGMs for the measurement of greenhouse gases (CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub>) is found to be precise, accurate and fit for purpose.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":454,"journal":{"name":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","volume":"28 5","pages":"209 - 220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00769-023-01552-z.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A case study for in-house method validation of gas chromatography technique using class-1 calibration gas mixtures for greenhouse gases monitoring\",\"authors\":\"Komal, Daya Soni, Shankar G. Aggarwal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00769-023-01552-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this study, analytical method validation has been done for the measurement of carbon dioxide/nitrogen (CO<sub>2</sub>/N<sub>2</sub>) and methane/nitrogen (CH<sub>4</sub>/N<sub>2</sub>) calibration gas mixtures using gas chromatography with flame ionization detector (GC-FID). Class-I calibration gas mixtures (CGMs) of CO<sub>2</sub> (500 µmol mol<sup>−1</sup> to 1100 µmol mol<sup>−1</sup>) and CH<sub>4</sub> (2 µmol mol<sup>−1</sup> to 130 µmol mol<sup>−1</sup>) used in method validation process has been prepared gravimetrically following ISO 6142-1. All prepared gas mixtures have expanded uncertainty 1 % at coverage factor (<i>k</i>) of 2 with 95 % confidence. The following parameters are chosen for this case study which include selectivity, accuracy, precision, linearity, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), robustness, stability, and uncertainty. Different statistical approaches are taken into consideration for each parameter assessment. The results indicate that GC-FID is selective for CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub>. CGMs represent good repeatability and reproducibility having percentage relative deviation < 1 % among measurements. A good linear behaviour was observed for CGMs of CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> on basis of least square regression with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> value 0.9995 and 1, respectively. LOD and LOQ for CH<sub>4</sub> are calculated 0.47 and 1.59 µmol mol<sup>−1</sup> based on signal-to-noise ratio by taking its lowest concentration of 2.9 µmol mol<sup>−1</sup>. The in-house validated method for GC-FID using CGMs for the measurement of greenhouse gases (CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub>) is found to be precise, accurate and fit for purpose.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accreditation and Quality Assurance\",\"volume\":\"28 5\",\"pages\":\"209 - 220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00769-023-01552-z.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accreditation and Quality Assurance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-023-01552-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-023-01552-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A case study for in-house method validation of gas chromatography technique using class-1 calibration gas mixtures for greenhouse gases monitoring
In this study, analytical method validation has been done for the measurement of carbon dioxide/nitrogen (CO2/N2) and methane/nitrogen (CH4/N2) calibration gas mixtures using gas chromatography with flame ionization detector (GC-FID). Class-I calibration gas mixtures (CGMs) of CO2 (500 µmol mol−1 to 1100 µmol mol−1) and CH4 (2 µmol mol−1 to 130 µmol mol−1) used in method validation process has been prepared gravimetrically following ISO 6142-1. All prepared gas mixtures have expanded uncertainty 1 % at coverage factor (k) of 2 with 95 % confidence. The following parameters are chosen for this case study which include selectivity, accuracy, precision, linearity, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), robustness, stability, and uncertainty. Different statistical approaches are taken into consideration for each parameter assessment. The results indicate that GC-FID is selective for CO2 and CH4. CGMs represent good repeatability and reproducibility having percentage relative deviation < 1 % among measurements. A good linear behaviour was observed for CGMs of CH4 and CO2 on basis of least square regression with R2 value 0.9995 and 1, respectively. LOD and LOQ for CH4 are calculated 0.47 and 1.59 µmol mol−1 based on signal-to-noise ratio by taking its lowest concentration of 2.9 µmol mol−1. The in-house validated method for GC-FID using CGMs for the measurement of greenhouse gases (CO2 and CH4) is found to be precise, accurate and fit for purpose.
期刊介绍:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance has established itself as the leading information and discussion forum for all aspects relevant to quality, transparency and reliability of measurement results in chemical and biological sciences. The journal serves the information needs of researchers, practitioners and decision makers dealing with quality assurance and quality management, including the development and application of metrological principles and concepts such as traceability or measurement uncertainty in the following fields: environment, nutrition, consumer protection, geology, metallurgy, pharmacy, forensics, clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, and microbiology.