使用1类校准气体混合物进行温室气体监测的气相色谱技术内部方法验证的案例研究

IF 0.8 4区 工程技术 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Komal, Daya Soni, Shankar G. Aggarwal
{"title":"使用1类校准气体混合物进行温室气体监测的气相色谱技术内部方法验证的案例研究","authors":"Komal,&nbsp;Daya Soni,&nbsp;Shankar G. Aggarwal","doi":"10.1007/s00769-023-01552-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, analytical method validation has been done for the measurement of carbon dioxide/nitrogen (CO<sub>2</sub>/N<sub>2</sub>) and methane/nitrogen (CH<sub>4</sub>/N<sub>2</sub>) calibration gas mixtures using gas chromatography with flame ionization detector (GC-FID). Class-I calibration gas mixtures (CGMs) of CO<sub>2</sub> (500 µmol mol<sup>−1</sup> to 1100 µmol mol<sup>−1</sup>) and CH<sub>4</sub> (2 µmol mol<sup>−1</sup> to 130 µmol mol<sup>−1</sup>) used in method validation process has been prepared gravimetrically following ISO 6142-1. All prepared gas mixtures have expanded uncertainty 1 % at coverage factor (<i>k</i>) of 2 with 95 % confidence. The following parameters are chosen for this case study which include selectivity, accuracy, precision, linearity, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), robustness, stability, and uncertainty. Different statistical approaches are taken into consideration for each parameter assessment. The results indicate that GC-FID is selective for CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub>. CGMs represent good repeatability and reproducibility having percentage relative deviation &lt; 1 % among measurements. A good linear behaviour was observed for CGMs of CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> on basis of least square regression with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> value 0.9995 and 1, respectively. LOD and LOQ for CH<sub>4</sub> are calculated 0.47 and 1.59 µmol mol<sup>−1</sup> based on signal-to-noise ratio by taking its lowest concentration of 2.9 µmol mol<sup>−1</sup>. The in-house validated method for GC-FID using CGMs for the measurement of greenhouse gases (CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub>) is found to be precise, accurate and fit for purpose.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":454,"journal":{"name":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","volume":"28 5","pages":"209 - 220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00769-023-01552-z.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A case study for in-house method validation of gas chromatography technique using class-1 calibration gas mixtures for greenhouse gases monitoring\",\"authors\":\"Komal,&nbsp;Daya Soni,&nbsp;Shankar G. Aggarwal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00769-023-01552-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this study, analytical method validation has been done for the measurement of carbon dioxide/nitrogen (CO<sub>2</sub>/N<sub>2</sub>) and methane/nitrogen (CH<sub>4</sub>/N<sub>2</sub>) calibration gas mixtures using gas chromatography with flame ionization detector (GC-FID). Class-I calibration gas mixtures (CGMs) of CO<sub>2</sub> (500 µmol mol<sup>−1</sup> to 1100 µmol mol<sup>−1</sup>) and CH<sub>4</sub> (2 µmol mol<sup>−1</sup> to 130 µmol mol<sup>−1</sup>) used in method validation process has been prepared gravimetrically following ISO 6142-1. All prepared gas mixtures have expanded uncertainty 1 % at coverage factor (<i>k</i>) of 2 with 95 % confidence. The following parameters are chosen for this case study which include selectivity, accuracy, precision, linearity, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), robustness, stability, and uncertainty. Different statistical approaches are taken into consideration for each parameter assessment. The results indicate that GC-FID is selective for CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub>. CGMs represent good repeatability and reproducibility having percentage relative deviation &lt; 1 % among measurements. A good linear behaviour was observed for CGMs of CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> on basis of least square regression with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> value 0.9995 and 1, respectively. LOD and LOQ for CH<sub>4</sub> are calculated 0.47 and 1.59 µmol mol<sup>−1</sup> based on signal-to-noise ratio by taking its lowest concentration of 2.9 µmol mol<sup>−1</sup>. The in-house validated method for GC-FID using CGMs for the measurement of greenhouse gases (CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub>) is found to be precise, accurate and fit for purpose.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accreditation and Quality Assurance\",\"volume\":\"28 5\",\"pages\":\"209 - 220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00769-023-01552-z.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accreditation and Quality Assurance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-023-01552-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-023-01552-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本研究中,使用带火焰离子化检测器的气相色谱法(GC-FID)对二氧化碳/氮气(CO2/N2)和甲烷/氮气(CH4/N2)校准气体混合物的测量进行了分析方法验证。方法验证过程中使用的CO2(500µmol−1至1100µmol mol−1)和CH4(2µmol−2至130µmol−)的I类校准气体混合物(CGM)已按照ISO 6142-1进行重量分析制备。所有制备的气体混合物在覆盖因子(k)为2时具有1%的扩展不确定度,置信度为95%。本案例研究选择了以下参数,包括选择性、准确性、精密度、线性、检测限(LOD)、定量限(LOQ)、稳健性、稳定性和不确定性。每个参数评估都考虑了不同的统计方法。结果表明,气相色谱-火焰离子化检测器对CO2和CH4具有选择性。CGM代表良好的重复性和再现性,具有百分比相对偏差 <; 1%。基于最小二乘回归,观察到CH4和CO2的CGM具有良好的线性行为,R2值分别为0.9995和1。CH4的LOD和LOQ根据信噪比计算为0.47和1.59µmol mol−1,取其最低浓度2.9µmol−1。使用CGM测量温室气体(CO2和CH4)的气相色谱-火焰离子化检测器的内部验证方法被发现是精确、准确和适用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A case study for in-house method validation of gas chromatography technique using class-1 calibration gas mixtures for greenhouse gases monitoring

A case study for in-house method validation of gas chromatography technique using class-1 calibration gas mixtures for greenhouse gases monitoring

In this study, analytical method validation has been done for the measurement of carbon dioxide/nitrogen (CO2/N2) and methane/nitrogen (CH4/N2) calibration gas mixtures using gas chromatography with flame ionization detector (GC-FID). Class-I calibration gas mixtures (CGMs) of CO2 (500 µmol mol−1 to 1100 µmol mol−1) and CH4 (2 µmol mol−1 to 130 µmol mol−1) used in method validation process has been prepared gravimetrically following ISO 6142-1. All prepared gas mixtures have expanded uncertainty 1 % at coverage factor (k) of 2 with 95 % confidence. The following parameters are chosen for this case study which include selectivity, accuracy, precision, linearity, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), robustness, stability, and uncertainty. Different statistical approaches are taken into consideration for each parameter assessment. The results indicate that GC-FID is selective for CO2 and CH4. CGMs represent good repeatability and reproducibility having percentage relative deviation < 1 % among measurements. A good linear behaviour was observed for CGMs of CH4 and CO2 on basis of least square regression with R2 value 0.9995 and 1, respectively. LOD and LOQ for CH4 are calculated 0.47 and 1.59 µmol mol−1 based on signal-to-noise ratio by taking its lowest concentration of 2.9 µmol mol−1. The in-house validated method for GC-FID using CGMs for the measurement of greenhouse gases (CO2 and CH4) is found to be precise, accurate and fit for purpose.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accreditation and Quality Assurance
Accreditation and Quality Assurance 工程技术-分析化学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Accreditation and Quality Assurance has established itself as the leading information and discussion forum for all aspects relevant to quality, transparency and reliability of measurement results in chemical and biological sciences. The journal serves the information needs of researchers, practitioners and decision makers dealing with quality assurance and quality management, including the development and application of metrological principles and concepts such as traceability or measurement uncertainty in the following fields: environment, nutrition, consumer protection, geology, metallurgy, pharmacy, forensics, clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, and microbiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信