Georges Brousse, Luc Fontana, Lemlih Ouchchane, Caroline Boisson, Laurent Gerbaud, Delphine Bourguet, Annick Perrier, Audrey Schmitt, Pierre Michel Llorca, Alain Chamoux
{"title":"工作场所欺凌目标患者群体的精神病理特征。","authors":"Georges Brousse, Luc Fontana, Lemlih Ouchchane, Caroline Boisson, Laurent Gerbaud, Delphine Bourguet, Annick Perrier, Audrey Schmitt, Pierre Michel Llorca, Alain Chamoux","doi":"10.1093/occmed/kqm148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A strong association between workplace bullying and subsequent anxiety and depression, indicated by empirical research, suggests that bullying is an aetiological factor for mental health problems.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate levels of stress and anxiety-depression disorder developed by targets of workplace bullying together with outcome at 12 months and to characterize this population in terms of psychopathology and sociodemographic features.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-eight patients (36 women and 12 men) meeting Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terror criteria for bullying were included in a prospective study. Evaluations were performed at first consultation and at 12 months using a standard clinical interview, a visual analogue scale of stress, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale, the Beech scale of stress in the workplace and a projective test (Picture-Frustration Study).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At first consultation, 81% of patients showed high levels of perceived stress at work and 83 and 52% presented with anxiety or depression, respectively. At 12 months, only 19% of working patients expressed a feeling of stress at work. There was a significant change in symptoms of anxiety while there was no change in symptoms of depression. Stress at work and depression influenced significatively capacity to go back to work. At 12-month assessments, workers showed a significantly better score on the HAD scale than non-workers. Over half the targets presented a neuroticism-related predominant personality trait.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Workplace bullying can have severe mental health repercussions, triggering serious and persistent underlying disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":520727,"journal":{"name":"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"122-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/occmed/kqm148","citationCount":"95","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychopathological features of a patient population of targets of workplace bullying.\",\"authors\":\"Georges Brousse, Luc Fontana, Lemlih Ouchchane, Caroline Boisson, Laurent Gerbaud, Delphine Bourguet, Annick Perrier, Audrey Schmitt, Pierre Michel Llorca, Alain Chamoux\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/occmed/kqm148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A strong association between workplace bullying and subsequent anxiety and depression, indicated by empirical research, suggests that bullying is an aetiological factor for mental health problems.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate levels of stress and anxiety-depression disorder developed by targets of workplace bullying together with outcome at 12 months and to characterize this population in terms of psychopathology and sociodemographic features.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-eight patients (36 women and 12 men) meeting Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terror criteria for bullying were included in a prospective study. Evaluations were performed at first consultation and at 12 months using a standard clinical interview, a visual analogue scale of stress, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale, the Beech scale of stress in the workplace and a projective test (Picture-Frustration Study).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At first consultation, 81% of patients showed high levels of perceived stress at work and 83 and 52% presented with anxiety or depression, respectively. At 12 months, only 19% of working patients expressed a feeling of stress at work. There was a significant change in symptoms of anxiety while there was no change in symptoms of depression. Stress at work and depression influenced significatively capacity to go back to work. At 12-month assessments, workers showed a significantly better score on the HAD scale than non-workers. Over half the targets presented a neuroticism-related predominant personality trait.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Workplace bullying can have severe mental health repercussions, triggering serious and persistent underlying disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"122-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/occmed/kqm148\",\"citationCount\":\"95\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqm148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2008/1/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqm148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2008/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Psychopathological features of a patient population of targets of workplace bullying.
Background: A strong association between workplace bullying and subsequent anxiety and depression, indicated by empirical research, suggests that bullying is an aetiological factor for mental health problems.
Aims: To evaluate levels of stress and anxiety-depression disorder developed by targets of workplace bullying together with outcome at 12 months and to characterize this population in terms of psychopathology and sociodemographic features.
Methods: Forty-eight patients (36 women and 12 men) meeting Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terror criteria for bullying were included in a prospective study. Evaluations were performed at first consultation and at 12 months using a standard clinical interview, a visual analogue scale of stress, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale, the Beech scale of stress in the workplace and a projective test (Picture-Frustration Study).
Results: At first consultation, 81% of patients showed high levels of perceived stress at work and 83 and 52% presented with anxiety or depression, respectively. At 12 months, only 19% of working patients expressed a feeling of stress at work. There was a significant change in symptoms of anxiety while there was no change in symptoms of depression. Stress at work and depression influenced significatively capacity to go back to work. At 12-month assessments, workers showed a significantly better score on the HAD scale than non-workers. Over half the targets presented a neuroticism-related predominant personality trait.
Conclusion: Workplace bullying can have severe mental health repercussions, triggering serious and persistent underlying disorders.