【骨膜下种植体植入的远期效果:附12例报告】。

Stefan Zwerger, Mario Hakim Abu-Id, Thomas Kreusch
{"title":"【骨膜下种植体植入的远期效果:附12例报告】。","authors":"Stefan Zwerger,&nbsp;Mario Hakim Abu-Id,&nbsp;Thomas Kreusch","doi":"10.1007/s10006-007-0081-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The subperiosteal dental implantation implant was orginally described in the 1940s. The inadequate long-term results of subperiosteal implants are in contrast to the excellent results documented for endosseus oral implants. Consequently, subperiosteal implants and other soft-tissue-anchored implants should not be used presently. The present report documented twelve patient cases with complications after treatment with subperiosteal implants. Typical complications of SI are implant exposure, inflammation, infection, fistula formation and implant mobility. After removing the SI severe atrophic bone was seen. The placement of osseointegrated oral implants was mostly not possible without autogenous bone grafting. The present report is in conclusion with other studies, that a regular control of patients with subperiosteal implants is necessary. Subperiosteal implants should definitely be removed, if continuous periods of complication occur. The complete oral rehabilitation requires further surgical treatment in the field of preprosthetic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":79515,"journal":{"name":"Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie : MKG","volume":" ","pages":"359-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10006-007-0081-5","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Long-term results of fittig subperiosteal implants: report of twelve patient cases].\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Zwerger,&nbsp;Mario Hakim Abu-Id,&nbsp;Thomas Kreusch\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10006-007-0081-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The subperiosteal dental implantation implant was orginally described in the 1940s. The inadequate long-term results of subperiosteal implants are in contrast to the excellent results documented for endosseus oral implants. Consequently, subperiosteal implants and other soft-tissue-anchored implants should not be used presently. The present report documented twelve patient cases with complications after treatment with subperiosteal implants. Typical complications of SI are implant exposure, inflammation, infection, fistula formation and implant mobility. After removing the SI severe atrophic bone was seen. The placement of osseointegrated oral implants was mostly not possible without autogenous bone grafting. The present report is in conclusion with other studies, that a regular control of patients with subperiosteal implants is necessary. Subperiosteal implants should definitely be removed, if continuous periods of complication occur. The complete oral rehabilitation requires further surgical treatment in the field of preprosthetic surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie : MKG\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"359-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10006-007-0081-5\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie : MKG\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-007-0081-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie : MKG","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-007-0081-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

骨膜下植牙术最初是在20世纪40年代提出的。骨膜下种植体的长期效果不佳,与骨内口腔种植体的良好效果形成鲜明对比。因此,目前不应使用骨膜下植入物和其他软组织固定植入物。本报告记录了12例骨膜下种植体治疗后出现并发症的病例。SI的典型并发症是种植体暴露、炎症、感染、瘘管形成和种植体移动。切除SI后可见严重萎缩骨。如果没有自体骨移植,骨整合口腔种植体的植入是不可能的。本报告与其他研究结论一致,对骨膜下植入物患者进行常规控制是必要的。如果连续出现并发症,骨膜下植入物一定要移除。口腔的完全康复需要进一步的手术治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Long-term results of fittig subperiosteal implants: report of twelve patient cases].

The subperiosteal dental implantation implant was orginally described in the 1940s. The inadequate long-term results of subperiosteal implants are in contrast to the excellent results documented for endosseus oral implants. Consequently, subperiosteal implants and other soft-tissue-anchored implants should not be used presently. The present report documented twelve patient cases with complications after treatment with subperiosteal implants. Typical complications of SI are implant exposure, inflammation, infection, fistula formation and implant mobility. After removing the SI severe atrophic bone was seen. The placement of osseointegrated oral implants was mostly not possible without autogenous bone grafting. The present report is in conclusion with other studies, that a regular control of patients with subperiosteal implants is necessary. Subperiosteal implants should definitely be removed, if continuous periods of complication occur. The complete oral rehabilitation requires further surgical treatment in the field of preprosthetic surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信