采血领域可预测和可避免的人为错误——来自三级卫生保健系统血库的独家分析。

P Pandey, R Chaudhary, R Tondon, D Khetan
{"title":"采血领域可预测和可避免的人为错误——来自三级卫生保健系统血库的独家分析。","authors":"P Pandey,&nbsp;R Chaudhary,&nbsp;R Tondon,&nbsp;D Khetan","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-3148.2007.00793.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Error is a direct reflection of system deficiency. Errors occurring in the phlebotomy area are grossly unreported. Though most of these errors does not lead to catastrophic outcome yet indicate system failure. The aim of the study was to identify errors that took place in phlebotomy area, analysing and classifying them. A prospective audit was conducted during an observational period of 8 months, in an overall cohort of 11 260 donors. The incidence of errors was 3.1%. Fifty-five percent errors were technical and remaining 44.9% were clerical. Of all the technical errors, 57.7% were classified as minor, whereas remaining 42.3% were of major category. Similarly, majority of clerical errors (89.9%) were of minor category. The trained staff accounted for all major events (27.8%). In the minor category, technical errors (73.2%) were more commonly done by trained staff, whereas for clerical errors (58.5%), newly recruited staff was responsible. Errors in phlebotomy area are benign but can compromise donor safety. The study helped to develop a consistent and straightforward classification system for errors and to reduce them by basic interventions. Errors committed mostly by our trained staff indicate the need of regular competency testing and an active system for detection of these deviations.</p>","PeriodicalId":442504,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"375-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1365-3148.2007.00793.x","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictable and avoidable human errors in phlebotomy area - an exclusive analysis from a tertiary health care system blood bank.\",\"authors\":\"P Pandey,&nbsp;R Chaudhary,&nbsp;R Tondon,&nbsp;D Khetan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1365-3148.2007.00793.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Error is a direct reflection of system deficiency. Errors occurring in the phlebotomy area are grossly unreported. Though most of these errors does not lead to catastrophic outcome yet indicate system failure. The aim of the study was to identify errors that took place in phlebotomy area, analysing and classifying them. A prospective audit was conducted during an observational period of 8 months, in an overall cohort of 11 260 donors. The incidence of errors was 3.1%. Fifty-five percent errors were technical and remaining 44.9% were clerical. Of all the technical errors, 57.7% were classified as minor, whereas remaining 42.3% were of major category. Similarly, majority of clerical errors (89.9%) were of minor category. The trained staff accounted for all major events (27.8%). In the minor category, technical errors (73.2%) were more commonly done by trained staff, whereas for clerical errors (58.5%), newly recruited staff was responsible. Errors in phlebotomy area are benign but can compromise donor safety. The study helped to develop a consistent and straightforward classification system for errors and to reduce them by basic interventions. Errors committed mostly by our trained staff indicate the need of regular competency testing and an active system for detection of these deviations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":442504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion Medicine (Oxford, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"375-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1365-3148.2007.00793.x\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion Medicine (Oxford, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3148.2007.00793.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3148.2007.00793.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

误差是系统缺陷的直接反映。在静脉切开术区域发生的错误基本上没有报道。虽然这些错误大多不会导致灾难性的后果,但却预示着系统的故障。本研究的目的是识别在采血区域发生的错误,并对其进行分析和分类。在为期8个月的观察期内,对11260名捐助者进行了前瞻性审计。差错发生率为3.1%。55%的错误是技术性的,剩下的44.9%是文书性的。在所有的技术错误中,57.7%属于次要错误,42.3%属于重大错误。同样,大部分笔误(89.9%)属于轻微错误。受过培训的人员占所有重大活动的27.8%。在轻微错误类别中,技术性错误(73.2%)较多由受过训练的职员犯,而文书错误(58.5%)则由新聘职员犯。放血部位的错误是良性的,但可能危及供体安全。这项研究有助于建立一个一致和直接的错误分类系统,并通过基本干预措施减少错误。我们训练有素的员工所犯的错误表明需要定期的能力测试和一个主动的系统来检测这些偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictable and avoidable human errors in phlebotomy area - an exclusive analysis from a tertiary health care system blood bank.

Error is a direct reflection of system deficiency. Errors occurring in the phlebotomy area are grossly unreported. Though most of these errors does not lead to catastrophic outcome yet indicate system failure. The aim of the study was to identify errors that took place in phlebotomy area, analysing and classifying them. A prospective audit was conducted during an observational period of 8 months, in an overall cohort of 11 260 donors. The incidence of errors was 3.1%. Fifty-five percent errors were technical and remaining 44.9% were clerical. Of all the technical errors, 57.7% were classified as minor, whereas remaining 42.3% were of major category. Similarly, majority of clerical errors (89.9%) were of minor category. The trained staff accounted for all major events (27.8%). In the minor category, technical errors (73.2%) were more commonly done by trained staff, whereas for clerical errors (58.5%), newly recruited staff was responsible. Errors in phlebotomy area are benign but can compromise donor safety. The study helped to develop a consistent and straightforward classification system for errors and to reduce them by basic interventions. Errors committed mostly by our trained staff indicate the need of regular competency testing and an active system for detection of these deviations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信