用postreprint对站立姿势的三维评价:一项内部和内部考官的可靠性研究。

Martin C Normand, Martin Descarreaux, Donald D Harrison, Deed E Harrison, Denise L Perron, Joseph R Ferrantelli, Tadeusz J Janik
{"title":"用postreprint对站立姿势的三维评价:一项内部和内部考官的可靠性研究。","authors":"Martin C Normand,&nbsp;Martin Descarreaux,&nbsp;Donald D Harrison,&nbsp;Deed E Harrison,&nbsp;Denise L Perron,&nbsp;Joseph R Ferrantelli,&nbsp;Tadeusz J Janik","doi":"10.1186/1746-1340-15-15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few digitizers can measure the complexity of upright human postural displacements in six degrees of freedom of the head, rib cage, and pelvis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a University laboratory, three examiners performed delayed repeated postural measurements on forty subjects over two days. Three digital photographs (left lateral, AP, right lateral) of each of 40 volunteer participants were obtained, twice, by three examiners. Examiners placed 13 markers on the subjects before photography and chose 16 points on the photographic images. Using the PosturePrint internet computer system, head, rib cage, and pelvic postures were calculated as rotations (Rx, Ry, Rz) in degrees and translations (Tx, Tz) in millimeters. For reliability, two different types (liberal = ICC(3,1) & conservative = ICC(2,1)) of inter- and intra-examiner correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated. Standard error of measurements (SEM) and mean absolute differences within and between observers' measurements were also determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All of the \"liberal\" ICCs were in the excellent range (> 0.84). For the more \"conservative\" type ICCs, four Inter-examiner ICCs were in the interval (0.5-0.6), 10 ICCs were in the interval (0.61-0.74), and the remainder were greater than 0.75. SEMs were 2.7 degrees or less for all rotations and 5.9 mm or less for all translations. Mean absolute differences within examiners and between examiners were 3.5 degrees or less for all rotations and 8.4 mm or less for all translations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For the PosturePrint system, the combined inter-examiner and intra-examiner correlation coefficients were in the good (14/44) and excellent (30/44) ranges. SEMs and mean absolute differences within and between examiners' measurements were small. Thus, this posture digitizer is reliable for clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":87173,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & osteopathy","volume":" ","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1746-1340-15-15","citationCount":"62","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three dimensional evaluation of posture in standing with the PosturePrint: an intra- and inter-examiner reliability study.\",\"authors\":\"Martin C Normand,&nbsp;Martin Descarreaux,&nbsp;Donald D Harrison,&nbsp;Deed E Harrison,&nbsp;Denise L Perron,&nbsp;Joseph R Ferrantelli,&nbsp;Tadeusz J Janik\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1746-1340-15-15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few digitizers can measure the complexity of upright human postural displacements in six degrees of freedom of the head, rib cage, and pelvis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a University laboratory, three examiners performed delayed repeated postural measurements on forty subjects over two days. Three digital photographs (left lateral, AP, right lateral) of each of 40 volunteer participants were obtained, twice, by three examiners. Examiners placed 13 markers on the subjects before photography and chose 16 points on the photographic images. Using the PosturePrint internet computer system, head, rib cage, and pelvic postures were calculated as rotations (Rx, Ry, Rz) in degrees and translations (Tx, Tz) in millimeters. For reliability, two different types (liberal = ICC(3,1) & conservative = ICC(2,1)) of inter- and intra-examiner correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated. Standard error of measurements (SEM) and mean absolute differences within and between observers' measurements were also determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All of the \\\"liberal\\\" ICCs were in the excellent range (> 0.84). For the more \\\"conservative\\\" type ICCs, four Inter-examiner ICCs were in the interval (0.5-0.6), 10 ICCs were in the interval (0.61-0.74), and the remainder were greater than 0.75. SEMs were 2.7 degrees or less for all rotations and 5.9 mm or less for all translations. Mean absolute differences within examiners and between examiners were 3.5 degrees or less for all rotations and 8.4 mm or less for all translations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For the PosturePrint system, the combined inter-examiner and intra-examiner correlation coefficients were in the good (14/44) and excellent (30/44) ranges. SEMs and mean absolute differences within and between examiners' measurements were small. Thus, this posture digitizer is reliable for clinical use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chiropractic & osteopathy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1746-1340-15-15\",\"citationCount\":\"62\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chiropractic & osteopathy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-15-15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chiropractic & osteopathy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-15-15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 62

摘要

背景:很少有数字化仪器可以测量头部、胸腔和骨盆六个自由度的直立人体姿势位移的复杂性。方法:在一所大学的实验室里,三名考官在两天内对40名受试者进行了延迟重复的姿势测量。由三名审查员分两次获得40名志愿者每人的三张数码照片(左侧面,正侧面,右侧面)。在摄影前,考官在科目上放置13个标记,并在摄影图像上选择16分。使用PosturePrint互联网计算机系统,头部、胸腔和骨盆的姿势以旋转(Rx, Ry, Rz)的角度和平移(Tx, Tz)的毫米来计算。对于信度,计算了两种不同类型(自由= ICC(3,1)和保守= ICC(2,1))的审查员之间和内部相关系数(ICC)。测量的标准误差(SEM)和观察者测量内部和之间的平均绝对差也被确定。结果:所有“自由”icc均在优范围内(> 0.84)。对于更“保守”型的ICCs, 4个Inter-examiner ICCs处于(0.5-0.6)区间,10个ICCs处于(0.61-0.74)区间,其余大于0.75。所有旋转的SEMs为2.7度或更小,所有平移的SEMs为5.9毫米或更小。检查器内部和检查器之间的平均绝对差异在所有旋转中为3.5度或更小,在所有平移中为8.4毫米或更小。结论:对于PosturePrint系统,审查员之间和审查员内部的综合相关系数在良好(14/44)和优秀(30/44)范围内。SEMs和平均绝对差异在内部和之间的考官的测量很小。因此,该姿势数字化仪在临床应用中是可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Three dimensional evaluation of posture in standing with the PosturePrint: an intra- and inter-examiner reliability study.

Three dimensional evaluation of posture in standing with the PosturePrint: an intra- and inter-examiner reliability study.

Three dimensional evaluation of posture in standing with the PosturePrint: an intra- and inter-examiner reliability study.

Three dimensional evaluation of posture in standing with the PosturePrint: an intra- and inter-examiner reliability study.

Background: Few digitizers can measure the complexity of upright human postural displacements in six degrees of freedom of the head, rib cage, and pelvis.

Methods: In a University laboratory, three examiners performed delayed repeated postural measurements on forty subjects over two days. Three digital photographs (left lateral, AP, right lateral) of each of 40 volunteer participants were obtained, twice, by three examiners. Examiners placed 13 markers on the subjects before photography and chose 16 points on the photographic images. Using the PosturePrint internet computer system, head, rib cage, and pelvic postures were calculated as rotations (Rx, Ry, Rz) in degrees and translations (Tx, Tz) in millimeters. For reliability, two different types (liberal = ICC(3,1) & conservative = ICC(2,1)) of inter- and intra-examiner correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated. Standard error of measurements (SEM) and mean absolute differences within and between observers' measurements were also determined.

Results: All of the "liberal" ICCs were in the excellent range (> 0.84). For the more "conservative" type ICCs, four Inter-examiner ICCs were in the interval (0.5-0.6), 10 ICCs were in the interval (0.61-0.74), and the remainder were greater than 0.75. SEMs were 2.7 degrees or less for all rotations and 5.9 mm or less for all translations. Mean absolute differences within examiners and between examiners were 3.5 degrees or less for all rotations and 8.4 mm or less for all translations.

Conclusion: For the PosturePrint system, the combined inter-examiner and intra-examiner correlation coefficients were in the good (14/44) and excellent (30/44) ranges. SEMs and mean absolute differences within and between examiners' measurements were small. Thus, this posture digitizer is reliable for clinical use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信