【补血温剂的温效与血损】。

O Moerer, A Bräuer, W Weyland, U Braun
{"title":"【补血温剂的温效与血损】。","authors":"O Moerer,&nbsp;A Bräuer,&nbsp;W Weyland,&nbsp;U Braun","doi":"10.1055/s-2004-814326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Question: </strong>Inadequately warmed blood or infusions contribute to the development of perioperative hypothermia. Therefore we analysed the efficiency of several infusion warmers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Tested infusion warmers: Model Autoline (Barkey) 500OR/241(Arizant), BW 385L(Biotest), H250/D50 und D60 (Level-1), H500/D300 (Level-1), Warmflo FW537-I/HEC40 (Tyco). Different solutions (saline, colloid solution and packed red blood cells PRBC) were tested varying the infusion flow, temperature of the solution and infusion pressure. Effective warming was defined as an infusion temperature > or = 33 degrees C. Haemolysis was measured by the increase of free plasma haemoglobin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The infusion warmers were effective within the following flow ranges: Low flow rate (< 250 ml/h): Autoline, 500OR/241 and H250/D60. Medium flow rate (250-2500 ml/h): Autoline, 500OR/241, BW385L (> 480 ml/h), H250/D 60 und D50 (> or = 1300 ml/h), FW537-I/HEC40 (> 950 ml/h. High flow rate (2500-10,000 ml/h): BW385L (up to 5000 ml/h), H250/D50, H250/D60, H500/D300 and FW537-I/HEC 40(R). Highest flow rates (> 10,000 ml/h): H250/D60, H500/D300 and FW537-I HEC40. Colloidal solutions were warmed nearly as good as saline, cooled PRBC had a smaller range of effective warming. There was no relevant haemolysis in any of the tested systems (plasma free haemoglobin raise < 24 mg/dl in all systems).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The warming capacity of the system and the length of the uninsulated infusion system determine the efficiency of an infusion warmer. The range of effective warming of an infusion warmer should be known for proper application.</p>","PeriodicalId":520554,"journal":{"name":"Anasthesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin, Schmerztherapie : AINS","volume":" ","pages":"138-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-2004-814326","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Warming efficacy and blood damaging of blood and infusion warmers].\",\"authors\":\"O Moerer,&nbsp;A Bräuer,&nbsp;W Weyland,&nbsp;U Braun\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-2004-814326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Question: </strong>Inadequately warmed blood or infusions contribute to the development of perioperative hypothermia. Therefore we analysed the efficiency of several infusion warmers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Tested infusion warmers: Model Autoline (Barkey) 500OR/241(Arizant), BW 385L(Biotest), H250/D50 und D60 (Level-1), H500/D300 (Level-1), Warmflo FW537-I/HEC40 (Tyco). Different solutions (saline, colloid solution and packed red blood cells PRBC) were tested varying the infusion flow, temperature of the solution and infusion pressure. Effective warming was defined as an infusion temperature > or = 33 degrees C. Haemolysis was measured by the increase of free plasma haemoglobin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The infusion warmers were effective within the following flow ranges: Low flow rate (< 250 ml/h): Autoline, 500OR/241 and H250/D60. Medium flow rate (250-2500 ml/h): Autoline, 500OR/241, BW385L (> 480 ml/h), H250/D 60 und D50 (> or = 1300 ml/h), FW537-I/HEC40 (> 950 ml/h. High flow rate (2500-10,000 ml/h): BW385L (up to 5000 ml/h), H250/D50, H250/D60, H500/D300 and FW537-I/HEC 40(R). Highest flow rates (> 10,000 ml/h): H250/D60, H500/D300 and FW537-I HEC40. Colloidal solutions were warmed nearly as good as saline, cooled PRBC had a smaller range of effective warming. There was no relevant haemolysis in any of the tested systems (plasma free haemoglobin raise < 24 mg/dl in all systems).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The warming capacity of the system and the length of the uninsulated infusion system determine the efficiency of an infusion warmer. The range of effective warming of an infusion warmer should be known for proper application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anasthesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin, Schmerztherapie : AINS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"138-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-2004-814326\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anasthesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin, Schmerztherapie : AINS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-814326\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anasthesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin, Schmerztherapie : AINS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-814326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

问题:不充分的温血或输注有助于围手术期低体温的发生。因此,我们分析了几种输液加热器的效率。方法:测试的输注加热器:型号Autoline (Barkey) 500OR/241(Arizant), BW 385L(Biotest), H250/D50和D60(一级),H500/D300(一级),Warmflo FW537-I/HEC40(泰科)。对不同的溶液(生理盐水、胶体溶液和填充红细胞PRBC)进行了不同的注射流量、注射温度和注射压力的测试。有效升温定义为输注温度>或= 33℃,溶血通过游离血浆血红蛋白的增加来测量。结果:在低流速(< 250ml /h)、Autoline、500OR/241、H250/D60流速范围内均有效。介质流速(250-2500 ml/h): Autoline, 500OR/241, BW385L (> 480 ml/h), H250/ d60和D50(>或= 1300 ml/h), FW537-I/HEC40 (> 950 ml/h)。高流量(2500- 10000 ml/h): BW385L(高达5000 ml/h), H250/D50, H250/D60, H500/D300和FW537-I/HEC 40(R)。最高流速(> 10,000 ml/h): H250/D60, H500/D300和FW537-I HEC40。胶体溶液的升温效果几乎与生理盐水一样好,冷却后的PRBC的有效升温范围较小。在所有测试系统中没有相关的溶血(血浆游离血红蛋白升高< 24 mg/dl)。结论:输液器的增温能力和非保温输液器的长度决定了输液器的增温效果。输液加热器的有效加热范围应该知道正确的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Warming efficacy and blood damaging of blood and infusion warmers].

Question: Inadequately warmed blood or infusions contribute to the development of perioperative hypothermia. Therefore we analysed the efficiency of several infusion warmers.

Method: Tested infusion warmers: Model Autoline (Barkey) 500OR/241(Arizant), BW 385L(Biotest), H250/D50 und D60 (Level-1), H500/D300 (Level-1), Warmflo FW537-I/HEC40 (Tyco). Different solutions (saline, colloid solution and packed red blood cells PRBC) were tested varying the infusion flow, temperature of the solution and infusion pressure. Effective warming was defined as an infusion temperature > or = 33 degrees C. Haemolysis was measured by the increase of free plasma haemoglobin.

Results: The infusion warmers were effective within the following flow ranges: Low flow rate (< 250 ml/h): Autoline, 500OR/241 and H250/D60. Medium flow rate (250-2500 ml/h): Autoline, 500OR/241, BW385L (> 480 ml/h), H250/D 60 und D50 (> or = 1300 ml/h), FW537-I/HEC40 (> 950 ml/h. High flow rate (2500-10,000 ml/h): BW385L (up to 5000 ml/h), H250/D50, H250/D60, H500/D300 and FW537-I/HEC 40(R). Highest flow rates (> 10,000 ml/h): H250/D60, H500/D300 and FW537-I HEC40. Colloidal solutions were warmed nearly as good as saline, cooled PRBC had a smaller range of effective warming. There was no relevant haemolysis in any of the tested systems (plasma free haemoglobin raise < 24 mg/dl in all systems).

Conclusion: The warming capacity of the system and the length of the uninsulated infusion system determine the efficiency of an infusion warmer. The range of effective warming of an infusion warmer should be known for proper application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信