HEp-2细胞间接免疫荧光法和酶免疫法测定抗核抗体筛选方法在自身免疫性肝病中的诊断价值

Q4 Health Professions
Aleksey Sergeevich Dorofeev, E N Aleksandrova, A A Novikov, K G Saliev, Yu G Sandler, E V Vinnitskaya
{"title":"HEp-2细胞间接免疫荧光法和酶免疫法测定抗核抗体筛选方法在自身免疫性肝病中的诊断价值","authors":"Aleksey Sergeevich Dorofeev,&nbsp;E N Aleksandrova,&nbsp;A A Novikov,&nbsp;K G Saliev,&nbsp;Yu G Sandler,&nbsp;E V Vinnitskaya","doi":"10.51620/0869-2084-2022-67-11-652-657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are a heterogeneous group of autoantibodies that react with various components of the cell nucleus and cytoplasm. ANA is the main serological marker for autoimmune liver disease (AILD). The aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic value of two methods of screening for the determination of ANA (indirect immunofluorescence reaction on HEp-2 cells (IIF -HEp-2) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the sera of AILD patients. The sera of 118 patients with AILD (51 with autoimmune hepatitis - AIH, 19 with primary biliary cholangitis - PBC, 48 with overlapping syndrome - OVERLAP), 30 patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and 30 healthy donors (HD) were studied. Determination of ANA by the IIF-HEp-2 method was carried out by visual assessment of samples under an AXIOSKOP 40 microscope, by ELISA - on an Alegria automatic analyzer. A weak degree of agreement between the positive and negative results of the ANA screening study using IIF-HEp-2 and ELISA (Cohen's kappa coefficient æ=0.4) was noted. Screening determination of ANA in patients with AILD by the IIF-HEp-2 method was distinguished by greater diagnostic sensitivity (DS) (68.6%) and a lower frequency of false negative results (31.4%) compared with ELISA (35.6% and 64.4 % respectively, p<0.05). The overall diagnostic specificity (DS) of the ANA study in IIF-HEp-2 was lower than with ELISA (66.7% and 86.7%, respectively, p<0.05). Both screening methods for determining ANA (IIF-HEp-2 and ELISA) were useful for diagnosing AILD (positive likelihood ratio - LR+: 2.1 and 2.6, respectively). In terms of the negative likelihood ratio (LR-), screening for ANA by the IIF-HEp-2 method, in contrast to ELISA, served as a \"useful\" test to exclude the diagnosis of AILD (0.5 and 0.8, respectively). The determination of ANA using IIF-HEp-2 is the most sensitive and \"useful\" screening test for the diagnosis of AILD, and ELISA is classified as a less \"useful\" screening method due to low diagnostic sensitivity and a high false-negative rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":52451,"journal":{"name":"Klinichescheskaya Laboratornaya Diagnostika","volume":"67 11","pages":"652-657"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic value of screening methods for the determination of antinuclear antibodies using indirect immunofluorescence on HEp-2 cells and enzyme immunoassay in autoimmune liver diseases.\",\"authors\":\"Aleksey Sergeevich Dorofeev,&nbsp;E N Aleksandrova,&nbsp;A A Novikov,&nbsp;K G Saliev,&nbsp;Yu G Sandler,&nbsp;E V Vinnitskaya\",\"doi\":\"10.51620/0869-2084-2022-67-11-652-657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are a heterogeneous group of autoantibodies that react with various components of the cell nucleus and cytoplasm. ANA is the main serological marker for autoimmune liver disease (AILD). The aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic value of two methods of screening for the determination of ANA (indirect immunofluorescence reaction on HEp-2 cells (IIF -HEp-2) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the sera of AILD patients. The sera of 118 patients with AILD (51 with autoimmune hepatitis - AIH, 19 with primary biliary cholangitis - PBC, 48 with overlapping syndrome - OVERLAP), 30 patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and 30 healthy donors (HD) were studied. Determination of ANA by the IIF-HEp-2 method was carried out by visual assessment of samples under an AXIOSKOP 40 microscope, by ELISA - on an Alegria automatic analyzer. A weak degree of agreement between the positive and negative results of the ANA screening study using IIF-HEp-2 and ELISA (Cohen's kappa coefficient æ=0.4) was noted. Screening determination of ANA in patients with AILD by the IIF-HEp-2 method was distinguished by greater diagnostic sensitivity (DS) (68.6%) and a lower frequency of false negative results (31.4%) compared with ELISA (35.6% and 64.4 % respectively, p<0.05). The overall diagnostic specificity (DS) of the ANA study in IIF-HEp-2 was lower than with ELISA (66.7% and 86.7%, respectively, p<0.05). Both screening methods for determining ANA (IIF-HEp-2 and ELISA) were useful for diagnosing AILD (positive likelihood ratio - LR+: 2.1 and 2.6, respectively). In terms of the negative likelihood ratio (LR-), screening for ANA by the IIF-HEp-2 method, in contrast to ELISA, served as a \\\"useful\\\" test to exclude the diagnosis of AILD (0.5 and 0.8, respectively). The determination of ANA using IIF-HEp-2 is the most sensitive and \\\"useful\\\" screening test for the diagnosis of AILD, and ELISA is classified as a less \\\"useful\\\" screening method due to low diagnostic sensitivity and a high false-negative rate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Klinichescheskaya Laboratornaya Diagnostika\",\"volume\":\"67 11\",\"pages\":\"652-657\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Klinichescheskaya Laboratornaya Diagnostika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51620/0869-2084-2022-67-11-652-657\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinichescheskaya Laboratornaya Diagnostika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51620/0869-2084-2022-67-11-652-657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗核抗体(ANA)是一种与细胞核和细胞质的各种成分发生反应的异质自身抗体。ANA是自身免疫性肝病(AILD)的主要血清学标志物。本研究的目的是比较两种筛选方法测定AILD患者血清中HEp-2细胞间接免疫荧光反应(IIF -HEp-2)和酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)的诊断价值。对118例AILD患者(自身免疫性肝炎- AIH 51例,原发性胆管炎- PBC 19例,重叠综合征-重叠48例)、30例非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)和30例健康供者(HD)的血清进行了研究。用IIF-HEp-2法测定ANA,在AXIOSKOP 40显微镜下目测样品,在Alegria自动分析仪上ELISA -测定样品。注意到使用IIF-HEp-2和ELISA筛查ANA研究的阳性和阴性结果之间存在弱程度的一致性(Cohen's kappa系数=0.4)。与ELISA(分别为35.6%和64.4%)相比,IIF-HEp-2方法筛选测定AILD患者的ANA具有更高的诊断敏感性(DS)(68.6%)和更低的假阴性结果频率(31.4%)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic value of screening methods for the determination of antinuclear antibodies using indirect immunofluorescence on HEp-2 cells and enzyme immunoassay in autoimmune liver diseases.

Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are a heterogeneous group of autoantibodies that react with various components of the cell nucleus and cytoplasm. ANA is the main serological marker for autoimmune liver disease (AILD). The aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic value of two methods of screening for the determination of ANA (indirect immunofluorescence reaction on HEp-2 cells (IIF -HEp-2) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the sera of AILD patients. The sera of 118 patients with AILD (51 with autoimmune hepatitis - AIH, 19 with primary biliary cholangitis - PBC, 48 with overlapping syndrome - OVERLAP), 30 patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and 30 healthy donors (HD) were studied. Determination of ANA by the IIF-HEp-2 method was carried out by visual assessment of samples under an AXIOSKOP 40 microscope, by ELISA - on an Alegria automatic analyzer. A weak degree of agreement between the positive and negative results of the ANA screening study using IIF-HEp-2 and ELISA (Cohen's kappa coefficient æ=0.4) was noted. Screening determination of ANA in patients with AILD by the IIF-HEp-2 method was distinguished by greater diagnostic sensitivity (DS) (68.6%) and a lower frequency of false negative results (31.4%) compared with ELISA (35.6% and 64.4 % respectively, p<0.05). The overall diagnostic specificity (DS) of the ANA study in IIF-HEp-2 was lower than with ELISA (66.7% and 86.7%, respectively, p<0.05). Both screening methods for determining ANA (IIF-HEp-2 and ELISA) were useful for diagnosing AILD (positive likelihood ratio - LR+: 2.1 and 2.6, respectively). In terms of the negative likelihood ratio (LR-), screening for ANA by the IIF-HEp-2 method, in contrast to ELISA, served as a "useful" test to exclude the diagnosis of AILD (0.5 and 0.8, respectively). The determination of ANA using IIF-HEp-2 is the most sensitive and "useful" screening test for the diagnosis of AILD, and ELISA is classified as a less "useful" screening method due to low diagnostic sensitivity and a high false-negative rate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Klinichescheskaya Laboratornaya Diagnostika
Klinichescheskaya Laboratornaya Diagnostika Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
110
期刊介绍: The journal deals with theoretical and practical problems of clinical laboratory diagnosis, publishes editorial articles, reviews of literature, original articles, short reports, discussions, book reviews, current events, materials which may assist the practitioners, methods of laboratory investigations used in medicine, materials on the results of practical application of new methods of investigation in the following fields of clinical laboratory diagnosis: hematology, cytology, coagulation, biochemistry, immunology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信