Aleksey Sergeevich Dorofeev, E N Aleksandrova, A A Novikov, K G Saliev, Yu G Sandler, E V Vinnitskaya
{"title":"HEp-2细胞间接免疫荧光法和酶免疫法测定抗核抗体筛选方法在自身免疫性肝病中的诊断价值","authors":"Aleksey Sergeevich Dorofeev, E N Aleksandrova, A A Novikov, K G Saliev, Yu G Sandler, E V Vinnitskaya","doi":"10.51620/0869-2084-2022-67-11-652-657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are a heterogeneous group of autoantibodies that react with various components of the cell nucleus and cytoplasm. ANA is the main serological marker for autoimmune liver disease (AILD). The aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic value of two methods of screening for the determination of ANA (indirect immunofluorescence reaction on HEp-2 cells (IIF -HEp-2) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the sera of AILD patients. The sera of 118 patients with AILD (51 with autoimmune hepatitis - AIH, 19 with primary biliary cholangitis - PBC, 48 with overlapping syndrome - OVERLAP), 30 patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and 30 healthy donors (HD) were studied. Determination of ANA by the IIF-HEp-2 method was carried out by visual assessment of samples under an AXIOSKOP 40 microscope, by ELISA - on an Alegria automatic analyzer. A weak degree of agreement between the positive and negative results of the ANA screening study using IIF-HEp-2 and ELISA (Cohen's kappa coefficient æ=0.4) was noted. Screening determination of ANA in patients with AILD by the IIF-HEp-2 method was distinguished by greater diagnostic sensitivity (DS) (68.6%) and a lower frequency of false negative results (31.4%) compared with ELISA (35.6% and 64.4 % respectively, p<0.05). The overall diagnostic specificity (DS) of the ANA study in IIF-HEp-2 was lower than with ELISA (66.7% and 86.7%, respectively, p<0.05). Both screening methods for determining ANA (IIF-HEp-2 and ELISA) were useful for diagnosing AILD (positive likelihood ratio - LR+: 2.1 and 2.6, respectively). In terms of the negative likelihood ratio (LR-), screening for ANA by the IIF-HEp-2 method, in contrast to ELISA, served as a \"useful\" test to exclude the diagnosis of AILD (0.5 and 0.8, respectively). The determination of ANA using IIF-HEp-2 is the most sensitive and \"useful\" screening test for the diagnosis of AILD, and ELISA is classified as a less \"useful\" screening method due to low diagnostic sensitivity and a high false-negative rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":52451,"journal":{"name":"Klinichescheskaya Laboratornaya Diagnostika","volume":"67 11","pages":"652-657"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic value of screening methods for the determination of antinuclear antibodies using indirect immunofluorescence on HEp-2 cells and enzyme immunoassay in autoimmune liver diseases.\",\"authors\":\"Aleksey Sergeevich Dorofeev, E N Aleksandrova, A A Novikov, K G Saliev, Yu G Sandler, E V Vinnitskaya\",\"doi\":\"10.51620/0869-2084-2022-67-11-652-657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are a heterogeneous group of autoantibodies that react with various components of the cell nucleus and cytoplasm. ANA is the main serological marker for autoimmune liver disease (AILD). The aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic value of two methods of screening for the determination of ANA (indirect immunofluorescence reaction on HEp-2 cells (IIF -HEp-2) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the sera of AILD patients. The sera of 118 patients with AILD (51 with autoimmune hepatitis - AIH, 19 with primary biliary cholangitis - PBC, 48 with overlapping syndrome - OVERLAP), 30 patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and 30 healthy donors (HD) were studied. Determination of ANA by the IIF-HEp-2 method was carried out by visual assessment of samples under an AXIOSKOP 40 microscope, by ELISA - on an Alegria automatic analyzer. A weak degree of agreement between the positive and negative results of the ANA screening study using IIF-HEp-2 and ELISA (Cohen's kappa coefficient æ=0.4) was noted. Screening determination of ANA in patients with AILD by the IIF-HEp-2 method was distinguished by greater diagnostic sensitivity (DS) (68.6%) and a lower frequency of false negative results (31.4%) compared with ELISA (35.6% and 64.4 % respectively, p<0.05). The overall diagnostic specificity (DS) of the ANA study in IIF-HEp-2 was lower than with ELISA (66.7% and 86.7%, respectively, p<0.05). Both screening methods for determining ANA (IIF-HEp-2 and ELISA) were useful for diagnosing AILD (positive likelihood ratio - LR+: 2.1 and 2.6, respectively). In terms of the negative likelihood ratio (LR-), screening for ANA by the IIF-HEp-2 method, in contrast to ELISA, served as a \\\"useful\\\" test to exclude the diagnosis of AILD (0.5 and 0.8, respectively). The determination of ANA using IIF-HEp-2 is the most sensitive and \\\"useful\\\" screening test for the diagnosis of AILD, and ELISA is classified as a less \\\"useful\\\" screening method due to low diagnostic sensitivity and a high false-negative rate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Klinichescheskaya Laboratornaya Diagnostika\",\"volume\":\"67 11\",\"pages\":\"652-657\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Klinichescheskaya Laboratornaya Diagnostika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51620/0869-2084-2022-67-11-652-657\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinichescheskaya Laboratornaya Diagnostika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51620/0869-2084-2022-67-11-652-657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnostic value of screening methods for the determination of antinuclear antibodies using indirect immunofluorescence on HEp-2 cells and enzyme immunoassay in autoimmune liver diseases.
Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are a heterogeneous group of autoantibodies that react with various components of the cell nucleus and cytoplasm. ANA is the main serological marker for autoimmune liver disease (AILD). The aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic value of two methods of screening for the determination of ANA (indirect immunofluorescence reaction on HEp-2 cells (IIF -HEp-2) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the sera of AILD patients. The sera of 118 patients with AILD (51 with autoimmune hepatitis - AIH, 19 with primary biliary cholangitis - PBC, 48 with overlapping syndrome - OVERLAP), 30 patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and 30 healthy donors (HD) were studied. Determination of ANA by the IIF-HEp-2 method was carried out by visual assessment of samples under an AXIOSKOP 40 microscope, by ELISA - on an Alegria automatic analyzer. A weak degree of agreement between the positive and negative results of the ANA screening study using IIF-HEp-2 and ELISA (Cohen's kappa coefficient æ=0.4) was noted. Screening determination of ANA in patients with AILD by the IIF-HEp-2 method was distinguished by greater diagnostic sensitivity (DS) (68.6%) and a lower frequency of false negative results (31.4%) compared with ELISA (35.6% and 64.4 % respectively, p<0.05). The overall diagnostic specificity (DS) of the ANA study in IIF-HEp-2 was lower than with ELISA (66.7% and 86.7%, respectively, p<0.05). Both screening methods for determining ANA (IIF-HEp-2 and ELISA) were useful for diagnosing AILD (positive likelihood ratio - LR+: 2.1 and 2.6, respectively). In terms of the negative likelihood ratio (LR-), screening for ANA by the IIF-HEp-2 method, in contrast to ELISA, served as a "useful" test to exclude the diagnosis of AILD (0.5 and 0.8, respectively). The determination of ANA using IIF-HEp-2 is the most sensitive and "useful" screening test for the diagnosis of AILD, and ELISA is classified as a less "useful" screening method due to low diagnostic sensitivity and a high false-negative rate.
期刊介绍:
The journal deals with theoretical and practical problems of clinical laboratory diagnosis, publishes editorial articles, reviews of literature, original articles, short reports, discussions, book reviews, current events, materials which may assist the practitioners, methods of laboratory investigations used in medicine, materials on the results of practical application of new methods of investigation in the following fields of clinical laboratory diagnosis: hematology, cytology, coagulation, biochemistry, immunology.