颈椎前路手术后吞咽困难的特征。

Advances in communication and swallowing Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-09 DOI:10.3233/acs-210034
John P Ziegler, Kate Davidson, Rebecca L Cooper, Kendrea L Garand, Shaun A Nguyen, Erick Yuen, Bonnie Martin-Harris, Ashli K O'Rourke
{"title":"颈椎前路手术后吞咽困难的特征。","authors":"John P Ziegler, Kate Davidson, Rebecca L Cooper, Kendrea L Garand, Shaun A Nguyen, Erick Yuen, Bonnie Martin-Harris, Ashli K O'Rourke","doi":"10.3233/acs-210034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-operative dysphagia is one of the most common complications of anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Examine post-operative structural and physiologic swallowing changes in patients with dysphagia following ACSS as compared with healthy age and gender matched controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Videofluoroscopic swallow studies of adults with dysphagia after ACSS were retrospectively reviewed. Seventy-five patients were divided into early (≤2 months) and late (> 2 months) post-surgical groups. Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP), Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) scores, and pharyngeal wall thickness (PWT) metrics were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were identified for all parameters between the control and early post-operative group. MBSImP Pharyngeal Total (PT) scores were greater in the early group (Interquartile Range (IQR) = 9-14, median = 12) versus controls (4-7, 5, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and late group (0.75-7.25, 2, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The early group had significantly higher maximum PAS scores (IQR = 3-8, median = 7) than both the control group (1-2, 1, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and late post-operative group (1-1.25, 1, <i>P</i> < 0.001). PWT was significantly greater in the early (IQR = 11.12-17.33 mm, median = 14.32 mm) and late groups (5.31-13.01, 9.15 mm) than controls (3.81-5.41, 4.68 mm, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dysphagic complaints can persist more than two months following ACSS, but often do not correlate with validated physiologic swallowing dysfunction on VFSS. Future studies should focus on applications of newer technology to elucidate relevant deficits.</p>","PeriodicalId":93726,"journal":{"name":"Advances in communication and swallowing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703912/pdf/nihms-1850122.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization of dysphagia following anterior cervical spine surgery.\",\"authors\":\"John P Ziegler, Kate Davidson, Rebecca L Cooper, Kendrea L Garand, Shaun A Nguyen, Erick Yuen, Bonnie Martin-Harris, Ashli K O'Rourke\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/acs-210034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-operative dysphagia is one of the most common complications of anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Examine post-operative structural and physiologic swallowing changes in patients with dysphagia following ACSS as compared with healthy age and gender matched controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Videofluoroscopic swallow studies of adults with dysphagia after ACSS were retrospectively reviewed. Seventy-five patients were divided into early (≤2 months) and late (> 2 months) post-surgical groups. Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP), Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) scores, and pharyngeal wall thickness (PWT) metrics were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were identified for all parameters between the control and early post-operative group. MBSImP Pharyngeal Total (PT) scores were greater in the early group (Interquartile Range (IQR) = 9-14, median = 12) versus controls (4-7, 5, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and late group (0.75-7.25, 2, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The early group had significantly higher maximum PAS scores (IQR = 3-8, median = 7) than both the control group (1-2, 1, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and late post-operative group (1-1.25, 1, <i>P</i> < 0.001). PWT was significantly greater in the early (IQR = 11.12-17.33 mm, median = 14.32 mm) and late groups (5.31-13.01, 9.15 mm) than controls (3.81-5.41, 4.68 mm, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dysphagic complaints can persist more than two months following ACSS, but often do not correlate with validated physiologic swallowing dysfunction on VFSS. Future studies should focus on applications of newer technology to elucidate relevant deficits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93726,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in communication and swallowing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9703912/pdf/nihms-1850122.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in communication and swallowing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/acs-210034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/11/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in communication and swallowing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/acs-210034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:术后吞咽困难是颈椎前路手术最常见的并发症之一:术后吞咽困难是颈椎前路手术(ACSS)最常见的并发症之一:与年龄和性别匹配的健康对照组相比,研究 ACSS 术后吞咽困难患者的吞咽结构和生理变化:方法:对 ACSS 术后吞咽困难成人的视频荧光屏吞咽研究进行回顾性审查。75名患者被分为术后早期(≤2个月)和晚期(>2个月)两组。比较了改良钡吞咽功能障碍档案(MBSImP)、穿刺-吞咽量表(PAS)评分和咽壁厚度(PWT)指标:结果:对照组和术后早期组的所有参数均存在显著差异。与对照组(4-7,5,P < 0.001)和晚期组(0.75-7.25,2,P < 0.001)相比,早期组的 MBSImP 咽部总(PT)评分更高(四分位数间距(IQR)= 9-14,中位数= 12)。早期组的最大 PAS 评分(IQR = 3-8,中位数 = 7)明显高于对照组(1-2,1,P <0.001)和术后晚期组(1-1.25,1,P <0.001)。早期组(IQR = 11.12-17.33 mm,中位数 = 14.32 mm)和晚期组(5.31-13.01,9.15 mm)的脉搏波速度明显大于对照组(3.81-5.41,4.68 mm,P <0.001):吞咽困难的主诉可在 ACSS 后持续两个月以上,但往往与 VFSS 验证的生理性吞咽功能障碍不相关。未来的研究应侧重于应用更新的技术来阐明相关缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterization of dysphagia following anterior cervical spine surgery.

Background: Post-operative dysphagia is one of the most common complications of anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS).

Objective: Examine post-operative structural and physiologic swallowing changes in patients with dysphagia following ACSS as compared with healthy age and gender matched controls.

Methods: Videofluoroscopic swallow studies of adults with dysphagia after ACSS were retrospectively reviewed. Seventy-five patients were divided into early (≤2 months) and late (> 2 months) post-surgical groups. Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP), Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) scores, and pharyngeal wall thickness (PWT) metrics were compared.

Results: Significant differences were identified for all parameters between the control and early post-operative group. MBSImP Pharyngeal Total (PT) scores were greater in the early group (Interquartile Range (IQR) = 9-14, median = 12) versus controls (4-7, 5, P < 0.001) and late group (0.75-7.25, 2, P < 0.001). The early group had significantly higher maximum PAS scores (IQR = 3-8, median = 7) than both the control group (1-2, 1, P < 0.001) and late post-operative group (1-1.25, 1, P < 0.001). PWT was significantly greater in the early (IQR = 11.12-17.33 mm, median = 14.32 mm) and late groups (5.31-13.01, 9.15 mm) than controls (3.81-5.41, 4.68 mm, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Dysphagic complaints can persist more than two months following ACSS, but often do not correlate with validated physiologic swallowing dysfunction on VFSS. Future studies should focus on applications of newer technology to elucidate relevant deficits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信