催眠对慢性腰痛患者疼痛教育(SHAPE)的建议:一项试点可行性随机对照试验。

Brian W Pulling, Felicity A Braithwaite, G Lorimer Moseley, Mark P Jensen, Anne L J Burke, Kathryn L Collins, Melissa J Hull, Hannah G Jones, Allan M Cyna, Nicki Ferencz, Tasha R Stanton
{"title":"催眠对慢性腰痛患者疼痛教育(SHAPE)的建议:一项试点可行性随机对照试验。","authors":"Brian W Pulling,&nbsp;Felicity A Braithwaite,&nbsp;G Lorimer Moseley,&nbsp;Mark P Jensen,&nbsp;Anne L J Burke,&nbsp;Kathryn L Collins,&nbsp;Melissa J Hull,&nbsp;Hannah G Jones,&nbsp;Allan M Cyna,&nbsp;Nicki Ferencz,&nbsp;Tasha R Stanton","doi":"10.1080/00207144.2022.2105147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a debilitating and burdensome condition, and new treatment strategies are needed. This study aimed to evaluate (1) the feasibility of undertaking a controlled clinical trial investigating a novel intervention for people with CLBP: hypnotically reinforced pain science education, and (2) the acceptability of the intervention as rated by participants. <i>A priori</i> feasibility and intervention acceptability criteria were set. Twenty participants with CLBP were recruited and randomized to receive: (1) hypnotically delivered pain science education that utilizes hypnotic suggestions to enhance uptake of pain science concepts; or (2) pain science education with progressive muscle relaxation as an attention control. Twenty participants were recruited, however, not solely from the hospital waitlist as intended; community sampling was required (13 hospital, 7 community). Most criteria were met in the community sample but not the hospital sample. Protocol modifications are needed before progressing to a full scale randomized controlled trial for hypnotically reinforced pain science education. Improvements in relevant secondary outcomes paired with moderate-high treatment acceptability ratings are promising.</p>","PeriodicalId":185230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis","volume":" ","pages":"251-276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suggestions in Hypnosis to Aid Pain Education (SHAPE) in People with Chronic Low-Back Pain: A Pilot Feasibility Randomized, Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Brian W Pulling,&nbsp;Felicity A Braithwaite,&nbsp;G Lorimer Moseley,&nbsp;Mark P Jensen,&nbsp;Anne L J Burke,&nbsp;Kathryn L Collins,&nbsp;Melissa J Hull,&nbsp;Hannah G Jones,&nbsp;Allan M Cyna,&nbsp;Nicki Ferencz,&nbsp;Tasha R Stanton\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00207144.2022.2105147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a debilitating and burdensome condition, and new treatment strategies are needed. This study aimed to evaluate (1) the feasibility of undertaking a controlled clinical trial investigating a novel intervention for people with CLBP: hypnotically reinforced pain science education, and (2) the acceptability of the intervention as rated by participants. <i>A priori</i> feasibility and intervention acceptability criteria were set. Twenty participants with CLBP were recruited and randomized to receive: (1) hypnotically delivered pain science education that utilizes hypnotic suggestions to enhance uptake of pain science concepts; or (2) pain science education with progressive muscle relaxation as an attention control. Twenty participants were recruited, however, not solely from the hospital waitlist as intended; community sampling was required (13 hospital, 7 community). Most criteria were met in the community sample but not the hospital sample. Protocol modifications are needed before progressing to a full scale randomized controlled trial for hypnotically reinforced pain science education. Improvements in relevant secondary outcomes paired with moderate-high treatment acceptability ratings are promising.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":185230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"251-276\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2022.2105147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2022.2105147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

慢性腰痛(CLBP)是一种使人衰弱和负担沉重的疾病,需要新的治疗策略。本研究旨在评估(1)开展一项对照临床试验,研究一种针对CLBP患者的新型干预措施:催眠强化疼痛科学教育的可行性,以及(2)参与者对干预措施的可接受性。设定了先验的可行性和干预可接受性标准。本研究招募了20名患有CLBP的参与者,随机接受:(1)催眠传递的疼痛科学教育,利用催眠建议来增强疼痛科学概念的吸收;或(2)以渐进式肌肉放松作为注意控制的疼痛科学教育。然而,20名参与者并非完全从医院等候名单中招募;需要进行社区抽样(13家医院,7个社区)。社区样本符合大多数标准,但医院样本不符合。在进行催眠强化疼痛科学教育的全面随机对照试验之前,需要修改协议。相关次要结局的改善与中高治疗可接受性评分相结合是有希望的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Suggestions in Hypnosis to Aid Pain Education (SHAPE) in People with Chronic Low-Back Pain: A Pilot Feasibility Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a debilitating and burdensome condition, and new treatment strategies are needed. This study aimed to evaluate (1) the feasibility of undertaking a controlled clinical trial investigating a novel intervention for people with CLBP: hypnotically reinforced pain science education, and (2) the acceptability of the intervention as rated by participants. A priori feasibility and intervention acceptability criteria were set. Twenty participants with CLBP were recruited and randomized to receive: (1) hypnotically delivered pain science education that utilizes hypnotic suggestions to enhance uptake of pain science concepts; or (2) pain science education with progressive muscle relaxation as an attention control. Twenty participants were recruited, however, not solely from the hospital waitlist as intended; community sampling was required (13 hospital, 7 community). Most criteria were met in the community sample but not the hospital sample. Protocol modifications are needed before progressing to a full scale randomized controlled trial for hypnotically reinforced pain science education. Improvements in relevant secondary outcomes paired with moderate-high treatment acceptability ratings are promising.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信