在神经营销研究中使用脑电图测量和机器学习预测消费者偏好的系统综述。

Q1 Computer Science
Adam Byrne, Emma Bonfiglio, Colin Rigby, Nicky Edelstyn
{"title":"在神经营销研究中使用脑电图测量和机器学习预测消费者偏好的系统综述。","authors":"Adam Byrne,&nbsp;Emma Bonfiglio,&nbsp;Colin Rigby,&nbsp;Nicky Edelstyn","doi":"10.1186/s40708-022-00175-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The present paper discusses the findings of a systematic review of EEG measures in neuromarketing, identifying which EEG measures are the most robust predictor of customer preference in neuromarketing. The review investigated which TF effect (e.g., theta-band power), and ERP component (e.g., N400) was most consistently reflective of self-reported preference. Machine-learning prediction also investigated, along with the use of EEG when combined with physiological measures such as eye-tracking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Search terms 'neuromarketing' and 'consumer neuroscience' identified papers that used EEG measures. Publications were excluded if they were primarily written in a language other than English or were not published as journal articles (e.g., book chapters). 174 papers were included in the present review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Frontal alpha asymmetry (FAA) was the most reliable TF signal of preference and was able to differentiate positive from negative consumer responses. Similarly, the late positive potential (LPP) was the most reliable ERP component, reflecting conscious emotional evaluation of products and advertising. However, there was limited consistency across papers, with each measure showing mixed results when related to preference and purchase behaviour.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>FAA and the LPP were the most consistent markers of emotional responses to marketing stimuli, consumer preference and purchase intention. Predictive accuracy of FAA and the LPP was greatly improved through the use of machine-learning prediction, especially when combined with eye-tracking or facial expression analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":37465,"journal":{"name":"Brain Informatics","volume":" ","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9663791/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of the prediction of consumer preference using EEG measures and machine-learning in neuromarketing research.\",\"authors\":\"Adam Byrne,&nbsp;Emma Bonfiglio,&nbsp;Colin Rigby,&nbsp;Nicky Edelstyn\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40708-022-00175-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The present paper discusses the findings of a systematic review of EEG measures in neuromarketing, identifying which EEG measures are the most robust predictor of customer preference in neuromarketing. The review investigated which TF effect (e.g., theta-band power), and ERP component (e.g., N400) was most consistently reflective of self-reported preference. Machine-learning prediction also investigated, along with the use of EEG when combined with physiological measures such as eye-tracking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Search terms 'neuromarketing' and 'consumer neuroscience' identified papers that used EEG measures. Publications were excluded if they were primarily written in a language other than English or were not published as journal articles (e.g., book chapters). 174 papers were included in the present review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Frontal alpha asymmetry (FAA) was the most reliable TF signal of preference and was able to differentiate positive from negative consumer responses. Similarly, the late positive potential (LPP) was the most reliable ERP component, reflecting conscious emotional evaluation of products and advertising. However, there was limited consistency across papers, with each measure showing mixed results when related to preference and purchase behaviour.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>FAA and the LPP were the most consistent markers of emotional responses to marketing stimuli, consumer preference and purchase intention. Predictive accuracy of FAA and the LPP was greatly improved through the use of machine-learning prediction, especially when combined with eye-tracking or facial expression analyses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Informatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9663791/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40708-022-00175-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Computer Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40708-022-00175-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

引言:本文讨论了神经营销中脑电图测量的系统回顾的发现,确定哪些脑电图测量是神经营销中客户偏好的最稳健的预测因子。本综述调查了哪种TF效应(例如,θ波段功率)和ERP成分(例如,N400)最一致地反映了自我报告的偏好。机器学习预测以及脑电图与眼动追踪等生理测量相结合的使用也进行了研究。方法:搜索词“神经营销”和“消费神经科学”识别论文使用脑电图测量。如果出版物主要以英语以外的语言撰写或未作为期刊文章(例如,书籍章节)发表,则不包括在内。本综述共收录174篇论文。结果:额叶α不对称(FAA)是最可靠的偏好TF信号,能够区分积极和消极的消费者反应。同样,后期正电位(LPP)是最可靠的ERP成分,反映了对产品和广告有意识的情感评价。然而,论文之间的一致性有限,当涉及到偏好和购买行为时,每种测量都显示出不同的结果。结论与启示:FAA和LPP是营销刺激情绪反应、消费者偏好和购买意愿最一致的标记。通过使用机器学习预测,特别是与眼球追踪或面部表情分析相结合,FAA和LPP的预测精度大大提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic review of the prediction of consumer preference using EEG measures and machine-learning in neuromarketing research.

Introduction: The present paper discusses the findings of a systematic review of EEG measures in neuromarketing, identifying which EEG measures are the most robust predictor of customer preference in neuromarketing. The review investigated which TF effect (e.g., theta-band power), and ERP component (e.g., N400) was most consistently reflective of self-reported preference. Machine-learning prediction also investigated, along with the use of EEG when combined with physiological measures such as eye-tracking.

Methods: Search terms 'neuromarketing' and 'consumer neuroscience' identified papers that used EEG measures. Publications were excluded if they were primarily written in a language other than English or were not published as journal articles (e.g., book chapters). 174 papers were included in the present review.

Results: Frontal alpha asymmetry (FAA) was the most reliable TF signal of preference and was able to differentiate positive from negative consumer responses. Similarly, the late positive potential (LPP) was the most reliable ERP component, reflecting conscious emotional evaluation of products and advertising. However, there was limited consistency across papers, with each measure showing mixed results when related to preference and purchase behaviour.

Conclusions and implications: FAA and the LPP were the most consistent markers of emotional responses to marketing stimuli, consumer preference and purchase intention. Predictive accuracy of FAA and the LPP was greatly improved through the use of machine-learning prediction, especially when combined with eye-tracking or facial expression analyses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Informatics
Brain Informatics Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain Informatics is an international, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary open-access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen, which provides a unique platform for researchers and practitioners to disseminate original research on computational and informatics technologies related to brain. This journal addresses the computational, cognitive, physiological, biological, physical, ecological and social perspectives of brain informatics. It also welcomes emerging information technologies and advanced neuro-imaging technologies, such as big data analytics and interactive knowledge discovery related to various large-scale brain studies and their applications. This journal will publish high-quality original research papers, brief reports and critical reviews in all theoretical, technological, clinical and interdisciplinary studies that make up the field of brain informatics and its applications in brain-machine intelligence, brain-inspired intelligent systems, mental health and brain disorders, etc. The scope of papers includes the following five tracks: Track 1: Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Brain Science Track 2: Human Information Processing Systems Track 3: Brain Big Data Analytics, Curation and Management Track 4: Informatics Paradigms for Brain and Mental Health Research Track 5: Brain-Machine Intelligence and Brain-Inspired Computing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信