[使用治疗护照促进提前护理计划]。

Q4 Nursing
Jesper Biesmans, Inge Jochem, Sascha R Bolt, Els P A G M Knapen, Marja Y Veenstra, Nicole C A Thomas, Jolanda Timmermans-Joosten, Judith M M Meijers
{"title":"[使用治疗护照促进提前护理计划]。","authors":"Jesper Biesmans,&nbsp;Inge Jochem,&nbsp;Sascha R Bolt,&nbsp;Els P A G M Knapen,&nbsp;Marja Y Veenstra,&nbsp;Nicole C A Thomas,&nbsp;Jolanda Timmermans-Joosten,&nbsp;Judith M M Meijers","doi":"10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2022.02.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Care recipients are becoming increasingly involved in the decision-making process for suitable treatments. Advance Care Planning (ACP) enables care recipients and healthcare professionals to timely think and discuss wishes and preferences for treatments, before a care recipient becomes limited by disease, cognitive problems or age. The Treatment Passport is developed by geriatric specialist Esther Bertholet and contains supportive questions to think about treatment wishes. This study aimed to evaluate the experiences of civilians and healthcare professionals with the usage of the Treatment Passport during ACP. Involved care organisations distributed the Treatment Passports to healthcare professionals, for example dementia casemanagers. Healthcare professionals then handed the Treatment passports to civilians, for example older persons. Thereafter, healthcare professionals (N=30) and civilians (N=80) filled out a questionnaire about the experiences with usage of the Treatment Passport. 65% of the civilians had a disease and a mean age 75.3 years. The Treatment Passport was considered a helpful tool to think and talk about treatment wishes. 57% of the healthcare professionals wants to keep using the Treatment Passport and 78% of the civilians would recommend it to others. Participants who found the passport of limited added value mostly had their own methods of discussing their treatment wishes.</p>","PeriodicalId":39945,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie","volume":"53 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Using the Treatment Passport to stimulate Advance Care Planning].\",\"authors\":\"Jesper Biesmans,&nbsp;Inge Jochem,&nbsp;Sascha R Bolt,&nbsp;Els P A G M Knapen,&nbsp;Marja Y Veenstra,&nbsp;Nicole C A Thomas,&nbsp;Jolanda Timmermans-Joosten,&nbsp;Judith M M Meijers\",\"doi\":\"10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2022.02.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Care recipients are becoming increasingly involved in the decision-making process for suitable treatments. Advance Care Planning (ACP) enables care recipients and healthcare professionals to timely think and discuss wishes and preferences for treatments, before a care recipient becomes limited by disease, cognitive problems or age. The Treatment Passport is developed by geriatric specialist Esther Bertholet and contains supportive questions to think about treatment wishes. This study aimed to evaluate the experiences of civilians and healthcare professionals with the usage of the Treatment Passport during ACP. Involved care organisations distributed the Treatment Passports to healthcare professionals, for example dementia casemanagers. Healthcare professionals then handed the Treatment passports to civilians, for example older persons. Thereafter, healthcare professionals (N=30) and civilians (N=80) filled out a questionnaire about the experiences with usage of the Treatment Passport. 65% of the civilians had a disease and a mean age 75.3 years. The Treatment Passport was considered a helpful tool to think and talk about treatment wishes. 57% of the healthcare professionals wants to keep using the Treatment Passport and 78% of the civilians would recommend it to others. Participants who found the passport of limited added value mostly had their own methods of discussing their treatment wishes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie\",\"volume\":\"53 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2022.02.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2022.02.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

接受护理的人越来越多地参与适当治疗的决策过程。提前护理计划(ACP)使护理接受者和医疗保健专业人员能够及时思考和讨论治疗的愿望和偏好,在护理接受者受到疾病、认知问题或年龄的限制之前。治疗护照是由老年专家Esther Bertholet开发的,其中包含支持性问题,以考虑治疗愿望。本研究旨在评估平民和医护人员在ACP期间使用治疗护照的经验。参与的护理组织向保健专业人员分发了《治疗护照》,例如痴呆症病例管理人员。然后,保健专业人员将治疗护照交给平民,例如老年人。随后,卫生保健专业人员(N=30)和平民(N=80)填写了关于使用治疗护照的经历的问卷,65%的平民患有疾病,平均年龄为75.3岁。治疗护照被认为是思考和谈论治疗愿望的有用工具。57%的医疗保健专业人员希望继续使用治疗护照,78%的平民会向他人推荐。发现附加值有限的护照的参与者大多有自己的治疗意愿讨论方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Using the Treatment Passport to stimulate Advance Care Planning].

Care recipients are becoming increasingly involved in the decision-making process for suitable treatments. Advance Care Planning (ACP) enables care recipients and healthcare professionals to timely think and discuss wishes and preferences for treatments, before a care recipient becomes limited by disease, cognitive problems or age. The Treatment Passport is developed by geriatric specialist Esther Bertholet and contains supportive questions to think about treatment wishes. This study aimed to evaluate the experiences of civilians and healthcare professionals with the usage of the Treatment Passport during ACP. Involved care organisations distributed the Treatment Passports to healthcare professionals, for example dementia casemanagers. Healthcare professionals then handed the Treatment passports to civilians, for example older persons. Thereafter, healthcare professionals (N=30) and civilians (N=80) filled out a questionnaire about the experiences with usage of the Treatment Passport. 65% of the civilians had a disease and a mean age 75.3 years. The Treatment Passport was considered a helpful tool to think and talk about treatment wishes. 57% of the healthcare professionals wants to keep using the Treatment Passport and 78% of the civilians would recommend it to others. Participants who found the passport of limited added value mostly had their own methods of discussing their treatment wishes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信