术中股骨近端骨折不同固定技术的生物力学测试:技术说明。

Q2 Medicine
Toni Wendler, Benjamin Fischer, Alexander Brand, Martin Weidling, Johannes Fakler, Dirk Zajonz, Georg Osterhoff
{"title":"术中股骨近端骨折不同固定技术的生物力学测试:技术说明。","authors":"Toni Wendler,&nbsp;Benjamin Fischer,&nbsp;Alexander Brand,&nbsp;Martin Weidling,&nbsp;Johannes Fakler,&nbsp;Dirk Zajonz,&nbsp;Georg Osterhoff","doi":"10.1080/23335432.2022.2142159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intraoperative proximal femoral fractures (IPFF) represent a rare but challenging complication of total hip arthroplasties. They usually occur as a longitudinal split. This pilot trial aimed to compare the biomechanical primary stability of different fixation techniques for IPFF. Standardised longitudinal medial split fractures of the proximal femur (type II, Modified Mallory Classification) were created in artificial osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic composite femora after implantation of a cementless femoral stem. Five different fixation techniques were compared: cerclage band, cerclage wiring with one or two wires, and lag screw fixation with one or two lag screws. A quasi-static loading protocol was applied and failure loads were evaluated. The observed median failure loads were 4192N (3982N - 5189N) for one cerclage band, 4450N (3577N - 4927N) for one cerclage wire, 5016N (4175N - 5685N) for two cerclage wires, 6085N (5000N - 8907N) for one lag screw, and 4774N (4509N - 8502N) for two lag screws. Due to the wide range of failure loads within the experimental groups, there were no observable differences between the groups. All fixation techniques provided sufficient primary stability in osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic composite bones. Further cadaveric studies with larger sample sizes may be needed to confirm the results presented here.</p>","PeriodicalId":52124,"journal":{"name":"International Biomechanics","volume":" ","pages":"27-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9683064/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical testing of different fixation techniques for intraoperative proximal femur fractures: a technical note.\",\"authors\":\"Toni Wendler,&nbsp;Benjamin Fischer,&nbsp;Alexander Brand,&nbsp;Martin Weidling,&nbsp;Johannes Fakler,&nbsp;Dirk Zajonz,&nbsp;Georg Osterhoff\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23335432.2022.2142159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Intraoperative proximal femoral fractures (IPFF) represent a rare but challenging complication of total hip arthroplasties. They usually occur as a longitudinal split. This pilot trial aimed to compare the biomechanical primary stability of different fixation techniques for IPFF. Standardised longitudinal medial split fractures of the proximal femur (type II, Modified Mallory Classification) were created in artificial osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic composite femora after implantation of a cementless femoral stem. Five different fixation techniques were compared: cerclage band, cerclage wiring with one or two wires, and lag screw fixation with one or two lag screws. A quasi-static loading protocol was applied and failure loads were evaluated. The observed median failure loads were 4192N (3982N - 5189N) for one cerclage band, 4450N (3577N - 4927N) for one cerclage wire, 5016N (4175N - 5685N) for two cerclage wires, 6085N (5000N - 8907N) for one lag screw, and 4774N (4509N - 8502N) for two lag screws. Due to the wide range of failure loads within the experimental groups, there were no observable differences between the groups. All fixation techniques provided sufficient primary stability in osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic composite bones. Further cadaveric studies with larger sample sizes may be needed to confirm the results presented here.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"27-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9683064/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2022.2142159\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2022.2142159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

术中股骨近端骨折(IPFF)是全髋关节置换术中一种罕见但具有挑战性的并发症。它们通常以纵向分裂的形式出现。本试验旨在比较不同固定技术对IPFF的生物力学初级稳定性。在植入无骨水泥的股骨干后,在人工骨质疏松和非骨质疏松的复合股骨中形成股骨近端标准化纵向内侧分裂骨折(II型,改良Mallory分类)。比较了5种不同的固定方法:环扎带、环扎钢丝一根或两根钢丝、拉力螺钉固定一根或两根拉力螺钉。采用准静态加载方案,对失效载荷进行了评估。观察到的中位失效载荷为:一根环扣带4192N (3982N - 5189N),一根环扣丝4450N (3577N - 4927N),两根环扣丝5016N (4175N - 5685N),一根拉力螺钉6085N (5000N - 8907N),两根拉力螺钉4774N (4509N - 8502N)。由于实验组的失效载荷范围较广,各组之间没有明显的差异。所有的固定技术在骨质疏松和非骨质疏松的复合骨中都提供了足够的初级稳定性。可能需要更大样本量的进一步尸体研究来证实这里提出的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Biomechanical testing of different fixation techniques for intraoperative proximal femur fractures: a technical note.

Biomechanical testing of different fixation techniques for intraoperative proximal femur fractures: a technical note.

Biomechanical testing of different fixation techniques for intraoperative proximal femur fractures: a technical note.

Biomechanical testing of different fixation techniques for intraoperative proximal femur fractures: a technical note.

Intraoperative proximal femoral fractures (IPFF) represent a rare but challenging complication of total hip arthroplasties. They usually occur as a longitudinal split. This pilot trial aimed to compare the biomechanical primary stability of different fixation techniques for IPFF. Standardised longitudinal medial split fractures of the proximal femur (type II, Modified Mallory Classification) were created in artificial osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic composite femora after implantation of a cementless femoral stem. Five different fixation techniques were compared: cerclage band, cerclage wiring with one or two wires, and lag screw fixation with one or two lag screws. A quasi-static loading protocol was applied and failure loads were evaluated. The observed median failure loads were 4192N (3982N - 5189N) for one cerclage band, 4450N (3577N - 4927N) for one cerclage wire, 5016N (4175N - 5685N) for two cerclage wires, 6085N (5000N - 8907N) for one lag screw, and 4774N (4509N - 8502N) for two lag screws. Due to the wide range of failure loads within the experimental groups, there were no observable differences between the groups. All fixation techniques provided sufficient primary stability in osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic composite bones. Further cadaveric studies with larger sample sizes may be needed to confirm the results presented here.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Biomechanics
International Biomechanics Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: International Biomechanics is a fully Open Access biomechanics journal that aims to foster innovation, debate and collaboration across the full spectrum of biomechanics. We publish original articles, reviews, and short communications in all areas of biomechanics and welcome papers that explore: Bio-fluid mechanics, Continuum Biomechanics, Biotribology, Cellular Biomechanics, Mechanobiology, Mechano-transduction, Tissue Mechanics, Comparative Biomechanics and Functional Anatomy, Allometry, Animal locomotion in biomechanics, Gait analysis in biomechanics, Musculoskeletal and Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Cardiovascular Biomechanics, Plant Biomechanics, Injury Biomechanics, Impact Biomechanics, Sport and Exercise Biomechanics, Kinesiology, Rehabilitation in biomechanics, Quantitative Ergonomics, Human Factors engineering, Occupational Biomechanics, Developmental Biomechanics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信