凯末尔大学临床实验室生化检测结果自动验证系统的设计与验证。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Biochemia Medica Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-05 DOI:10.11613/BM.2022.030704
Bahar Ünlü Gül, Oğuzhan Özcan, Serdar Doğan, Abdullah Arpaci
{"title":"凯末尔大学临床实验室生化检测结果自动验证系统的设计与验证。","authors":"Bahar Ünlü Gül,&nbsp;Oğuzhan Özcan,&nbsp;Serdar Doğan,&nbsp;Abdullah Arpaci","doi":"10.11613/BM.2022.030704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Autoverification (AV) is a postanalytical tool that uses algorithms to validate test results according to specified criteria. The Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) document for AV of clinical laboratory test result (AUTO-10A) includes recommendations for laboratories needing guidance on implementation of AV algorithms. The aim was to design and validate the AV algorithm for biochemical tests.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Criteria were defined according to AUTO-10A. Three different approaches for algorithm were used as result limit checks, which are reference range, reference range <b>±</b> total allowable error, and 2nd and 98th percentile values. To validate the algorithm, 720 cases in middleware were tested. For actual cases, 3,188,095 results and 194,520 reports in laboratory information system (LIS) were evaluated using the AV system. Cohen's kappa (κ) was calculated to determine the degree of agreement between seven independent reviewers and the AV system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AV passing rate was found between 77% and 85%. The highest rates of AV were in alanine transaminase (ALT), direct bilirubin (DBIL), and magnesium (Mg), which all had AV rates exceeding 85%. The most common reason for non-validated results was the result limit check (41%). A total of 328 reports evaluated by reviewers were compared to AV system. The statistical analysis resulted in a κ value between 0.39 and 0.63 (P < 0.001) and an agreement rate between 79% and 88%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our improved model can help laboratories design, build, and validate AV systems and be used as starting point for different test groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":9021,"journal":{"name":"Biochemia Medica","volume":" ","pages":"030704"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344865/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing and validating an autoverification system of biochemical test results in Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, clinical laboratory.\",\"authors\":\"Bahar Ünlü Gül,&nbsp;Oğuzhan Özcan,&nbsp;Serdar Doğan,&nbsp;Abdullah Arpaci\",\"doi\":\"10.11613/BM.2022.030704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Autoverification (AV) is a postanalytical tool that uses algorithms to validate test results according to specified criteria. The Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) document for AV of clinical laboratory test result (AUTO-10A) includes recommendations for laboratories needing guidance on implementation of AV algorithms. The aim was to design and validate the AV algorithm for biochemical tests.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Criteria were defined according to AUTO-10A. Three different approaches for algorithm were used as result limit checks, which are reference range, reference range <b>±</b> total allowable error, and 2nd and 98th percentile values. To validate the algorithm, 720 cases in middleware were tested. For actual cases, 3,188,095 results and 194,520 reports in laboratory information system (LIS) were evaluated using the AV system. Cohen's kappa (κ) was calculated to determine the degree of agreement between seven independent reviewers and the AV system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AV passing rate was found between 77% and 85%. The highest rates of AV were in alanine transaminase (ALT), direct bilirubin (DBIL), and magnesium (Mg), which all had AV rates exceeding 85%. The most common reason for non-validated results was the result limit check (41%). A total of 328 reports evaluated by reviewers were compared to AV system. The statistical analysis resulted in a κ value between 0.39 and 0.63 (P < 0.001) and an agreement rate between 79% and 88%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our improved model can help laboratories design, build, and validate AV systems and be used as starting point for different test groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biochemia Medica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"030704\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344865/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biochemia Medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2022.030704\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemia Medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2022.030704","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自动验证(AV)是一种后分析工具,它使用算法根据指定的标准验证测试结果。临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)关于临床实验室检测结果AV (AUTO-10A)的文件包括对需要实施AV算法指导的实验室的建议。目的是设计和验证生物化学测试的AV算法。材料和方法:根据AUTO-10A标准确定标准。采用参考极差、参考极差±总允许误差、第2和第98百分位值三种不同的算法进行结果极限检查。为了验证算法的有效性,对中间件中的720个案例进行了测试。在实际病例中,使用AV系统对实验室信息系统(LIS)中的3188095份结果和194520份报告进行了评估。计算Cohen’s kappa (κ)以确定7位独立审稿人与AV系统之间的一致程度。结果:AV通过率为77% ~ 85%。谷丙转氨酶(ALT)、直接胆红素(DBIL)和镁(Mg)中AV率最高,均超过85%。未验证结果最常见的原因是结果限制检查(41%)。审稿人评估的328份报告与AV系统进行了比较。经统计学分析,κ值在0.39 ~ 0.63之间(P < 0.001),符合率在79% ~ 88%之间。结论:我们改进的模型可以帮助实验室设计、构建和验证AV系统,并可作为不同测试组的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Designing and validating an autoverification system of biochemical test results in Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, clinical laboratory.

Designing and validating an autoverification system of biochemical test results in Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, clinical laboratory.

Designing and validating an autoverification system of biochemical test results in Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, clinical laboratory.

Designing and validating an autoverification system of biochemical test results in Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, clinical laboratory.

Introduction: Autoverification (AV) is a postanalytical tool that uses algorithms to validate test results according to specified criteria. The Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) document for AV of clinical laboratory test result (AUTO-10A) includes recommendations for laboratories needing guidance on implementation of AV algorithms. The aim was to design and validate the AV algorithm for biochemical tests.

Materials and methods: Criteria were defined according to AUTO-10A. Three different approaches for algorithm were used as result limit checks, which are reference range, reference range ± total allowable error, and 2nd and 98th percentile values. To validate the algorithm, 720 cases in middleware were tested. For actual cases, 3,188,095 results and 194,520 reports in laboratory information system (LIS) were evaluated using the AV system. Cohen's kappa (κ) was calculated to determine the degree of agreement between seven independent reviewers and the AV system.

Results: The AV passing rate was found between 77% and 85%. The highest rates of AV were in alanine transaminase (ALT), direct bilirubin (DBIL), and magnesium (Mg), which all had AV rates exceeding 85%. The most common reason for non-validated results was the result limit check (41%). A total of 328 reports evaluated by reviewers were compared to AV system. The statistical analysis resulted in a κ value between 0.39 and 0.63 (P < 0.001) and an agreement rate between 79% and 88%.

Conclusions: Our improved model can help laboratories design, build, and validate AV systems and be used as starting point for different test groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biochemia Medica
Biochemia Medica 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biochemia Medica is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Journal provides a wide coverage of research in all aspects of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. Following categories fit into the scope of the Journal: general clinical chemistry, haematology and haemostasis, molecular diagnostics and endocrinology. Development, validation and verification of analytical techniques and methods applicable to clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine are welcome as well as studies dealing with laboratory organization, automation and quality control. Journal publishes on a regular basis educative preanalytical case reports (Preanalytical mysteries), articles dealing with applied biostatistics (Lessons in biostatistics) and research integrity (Research integrity corner).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信