基于国家健康保险索赔数据库公开数据的日本心脏康复量的地区差异

Journal of rural medicine : JRM Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-22 DOI:10.2185/jrm.2022-015
Toshikazu Ito, Issei Kameda, Naoki Fujimoto, Ryo Momosaki
{"title":"基于国家健康保险索赔数据库公开数据的日本心脏康复量的地区差异","authors":"Toshikazu Ito,&nbsp;Issei Kameda,&nbsp;Naoki Fujimoto,&nbsp;Ryo Momosaki","doi":"10.2185/jrm.2022-015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study assessed the regional disparities and the associated factors in the implementation of cardiac rehabilitation in Japan. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Regional disparities were investigated by comparing the number of cardiac rehabilitation units in each of 47 prefectures in Japan based on the National Database of Health Insurance Claims Open Data published by the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. The relationships between the numbers of inpatient and outpatient cardiac rehabilitation units and the numbers of registered instructors of cardiac rehabilitation, board-certified physiatrists, and board-certified cardiologists were examined. <b>Results:</b> The region with the highest and lowest numbers of inpatient units showed 11,620.5 and 1,650.2 population-adjusted cardiac rehabilitation units adjusted per 100,000 population, respectively, corresponding to a 7.0-fold difference. Meanwhile, 4,865.3 and 238.6 units were present in the regions with the highest and lowest numbers of outpatient units, respectively, corresponding to a 20.4-fold regional disparity. Our analysis showed that the population-adjusted number of inpatient cardiac rehabilitation units was significantly associated with the population-adjusted numbers of registered instructors of cardiac rehabilitation (r=0.647, <i>P</i><0.001) and board-certified cardiologists (r=0.445, <i>P</i>=0.002) but only marginally associated with the population-adjusted number of board-certified physiatrists (r=0.329, <i>P</i>=0.024). Moreover, the population-adjusted number of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation units was significantly associated with the population-adjusted numbers of registered instructors of cardiac rehabilitation (r=0.406, <i>P</i>=0.005) and board-certified cardiologists (r=0.450, <i>P</i>=0.002) but not with the population-adjusted number of board-certified physiatrists (r=0.078, <i>P</i>=0.603). <b>Conclusion:</b> Large regional disparities were observed during the implementation of cardiac rehabilitation. Increased numbers of cardiac rehabilitation instructors and cardiac rehabilitation practices are expected to eliminate these regional differences in cardiac rehabilitation practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":73939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of rural medicine : JRM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2b/e6/jrm-17-221.PMC9613365.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional disparities in cardiac rehabilitation volume throughout Japan based on open data from a National Database of Health Insurance Claims.\",\"authors\":\"Toshikazu Ito,&nbsp;Issei Kameda,&nbsp;Naoki Fujimoto,&nbsp;Ryo Momosaki\",\"doi\":\"10.2185/jrm.2022-015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study assessed the regional disparities and the associated factors in the implementation of cardiac rehabilitation in Japan. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Regional disparities were investigated by comparing the number of cardiac rehabilitation units in each of 47 prefectures in Japan based on the National Database of Health Insurance Claims Open Data published by the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. The relationships between the numbers of inpatient and outpatient cardiac rehabilitation units and the numbers of registered instructors of cardiac rehabilitation, board-certified physiatrists, and board-certified cardiologists were examined. <b>Results:</b> The region with the highest and lowest numbers of inpatient units showed 11,620.5 and 1,650.2 population-adjusted cardiac rehabilitation units adjusted per 100,000 population, respectively, corresponding to a 7.0-fold difference. Meanwhile, 4,865.3 and 238.6 units were present in the regions with the highest and lowest numbers of outpatient units, respectively, corresponding to a 20.4-fold regional disparity. Our analysis showed that the population-adjusted number of inpatient cardiac rehabilitation units was significantly associated with the population-adjusted numbers of registered instructors of cardiac rehabilitation (r=0.647, <i>P</i><0.001) and board-certified cardiologists (r=0.445, <i>P</i>=0.002) but only marginally associated with the population-adjusted number of board-certified physiatrists (r=0.329, <i>P</i>=0.024). Moreover, the population-adjusted number of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation units was significantly associated with the population-adjusted numbers of registered instructors of cardiac rehabilitation (r=0.406, <i>P</i>=0.005) and board-certified cardiologists (r=0.450, <i>P</i>=0.002) but not with the population-adjusted number of board-certified physiatrists (r=0.078, <i>P</i>=0.603). <b>Conclusion:</b> Large regional disparities were observed during the implementation of cardiac rehabilitation. Increased numbers of cardiac rehabilitation instructors and cardiac rehabilitation practices are expected to eliminate these regional differences in cardiac rehabilitation practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of rural medicine : JRM\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2b/e6/jrm-17-221.PMC9613365.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of rural medicine : JRM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2185/jrm.2022-015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of rural medicine : JRM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2185/jrm.2022-015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究评估日本心脏康复实施的地区差异及相关因素。材料和方法:根据厚生劳动省公布的国家健康保险索赔开放数据数据库,通过比较日本47个县的心脏康复单位数量来调查地区差异。研究了住院和门诊心脏康复单位数量与注册心脏康复指导医师、注册注册内科医师和注册注册心脏病专家数量的关系。结果:住院单位数最高和最低的地区,每10万人口调整的人口调整心脏康复单位数分别为11,620.5和1,650.2个,差异为7.0倍。与此同时,门诊数量最多和最少的地区分别有4865.3个和238.6个,相当于20.4倍的地区差距。我们的分析显示,经人口调整的心脏康复住院单位数量与经人口调整的心脏康复注册指导员数量显著相关(r=0.647, PP=0.002),但与经人口调整的委员会认证的物理医师数量仅轻微相关(r=0.329, P=0.024)。经人口调整的门诊心脏康复单位数量与经人口调整的心脏康复注册指导员数量(r=0.406, P=0.005)、注册心脏科医师数量(r=0.450, P=0.002)显著相关,与经人口调整的注册心脏科医师数量无显著相关(r=0.078, P=0.603)。结论:在心脏康复的实施过程中存在较大的地区差异。心脏康复指导员和心脏康复实践人数的增加有望消除心脏康复实践中的这些区域差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Regional disparities in cardiac rehabilitation volume throughout Japan based on open data from a National Database of Health Insurance Claims.

Regional disparities in cardiac rehabilitation volume throughout Japan based on open data from a National Database of Health Insurance Claims.

Regional disparities in cardiac rehabilitation volume throughout Japan based on open data from a National Database of Health Insurance Claims.

Regional disparities in cardiac rehabilitation volume throughout Japan based on open data from a National Database of Health Insurance Claims.

Objective: This study assessed the regional disparities and the associated factors in the implementation of cardiac rehabilitation in Japan. Materials and Methods: Regional disparities were investigated by comparing the number of cardiac rehabilitation units in each of 47 prefectures in Japan based on the National Database of Health Insurance Claims Open Data published by the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. The relationships between the numbers of inpatient and outpatient cardiac rehabilitation units and the numbers of registered instructors of cardiac rehabilitation, board-certified physiatrists, and board-certified cardiologists were examined. Results: The region with the highest and lowest numbers of inpatient units showed 11,620.5 and 1,650.2 population-adjusted cardiac rehabilitation units adjusted per 100,000 population, respectively, corresponding to a 7.0-fold difference. Meanwhile, 4,865.3 and 238.6 units were present in the regions with the highest and lowest numbers of outpatient units, respectively, corresponding to a 20.4-fold regional disparity. Our analysis showed that the population-adjusted number of inpatient cardiac rehabilitation units was significantly associated with the population-adjusted numbers of registered instructors of cardiac rehabilitation (r=0.647, P<0.001) and board-certified cardiologists (r=0.445, P=0.002) but only marginally associated with the population-adjusted number of board-certified physiatrists (r=0.329, P=0.024). Moreover, the population-adjusted number of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation units was significantly associated with the population-adjusted numbers of registered instructors of cardiac rehabilitation (r=0.406, P=0.005) and board-certified cardiologists (r=0.450, P=0.002) but not with the population-adjusted number of board-certified physiatrists (r=0.078, P=0.603). Conclusion: Large regional disparities were observed during the implementation of cardiac rehabilitation. Increased numbers of cardiac rehabilitation instructors and cardiac rehabilitation practices are expected to eliminate these regional differences in cardiac rehabilitation practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信