呼吸防护装备应用的生物力学与生理学评价。

IF 1.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research Pub Date : 2022-07-26 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2147/MDER.S370142
Silvia Caggiari, Dan L Bader, Finn Foxell, Nicholas Pipe, Seana Couch, Abbie Turner, Peter R Worsley
{"title":"呼吸防护装备应用的生物力学与生理学评价。","authors":"Silvia Caggiari,&nbsp;Dan L Bader,&nbsp;Finn Foxell,&nbsp;Nicholas Pipe,&nbsp;Seana Couch,&nbsp;Abbie Turner,&nbsp;Peter R Worsley","doi":"10.2147/MDER.S370142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Respiratory protective equipment is widely used in healthcare settings to protect clinicians whilst treating patients with COVID-19. However, their generic designs do not accommodate the variability in face shape across genders and ethnicities. Accordingly, they are regularly overtightened to compensate for a poor fit. The present study aims at investigating the biomechanical and thermal loads during respirator application and the associated changes in local skin physiology at the skin-device interface.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixteen healthy volunteers were recruited and reflected a range of gender, ethnicities and facial anthropometrics. Four single-use respirators were evaluated representing different geometries, size and material interfaces. Participants were asked to wear each respirator in a random order while a series of measurements were recorded, including interface pressure, temperature and relative humidity. Measures of transepidermal water loss and skin hydration were assessed pre- and post-respirator application, and after 20 minutes of recovery. Statistical analysis assessed differences between respirator designs and associations between demographics, interface conditions and parameters of skin health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed a statistically significant negative correlation (p < 0.05) between the alar width and interface pressures at the nasal bridge, for three of the respirator designs. The nasal bridge site also corresponded to the highest pressures for all respirator designs. Temperature and humidity significantly increased (p < 0.05) during each respirator application. Significant increases in transepidermal water loss values (p < 0.05) were observed after the application of the respirators in females, which were most apparent at the nasal bridge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results revealed that specific facial features affected the distribution of interface pressures and depending on the respirator design and material, changes in skin barrier function were evident. The development of respirator designs that accommodate a diverse range of face shapes and protect the end users from skin damage are required to support the long-term use of these devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":47140,"journal":{"name":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","volume":" ","pages":"241-252"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9343257/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical and Physiological Evaluation of Respiratory Protective Equipment Application.\",\"authors\":\"Silvia Caggiari,&nbsp;Dan L Bader,&nbsp;Finn Foxell,&nbsp;Nicholas Pipe,&nbsp;Seana Couch,&nbsp;Abbie Turner,&nbsp;Peter R Worsley\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/MDER.S370142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Respiratory protective equipment is widely used in healthcare settings to protect clinicians whilst treating patients with COVID-19. However, their generic designs do not accommodate the variability in face shape across genders and ethnicities. Accordingly, they are regularly overtightened to compensate for a poor fit. The present study aims at investigating the biomechanical and thermal loads during respirator application and the associated changes in local skin physiology at the skin-device interface.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixteen healthy volunteers were recruited and reflected a range of gender, ethnicities and facial anthropometrics. Four single-use respirators were evaluated representing different geometries, size and material interfaces. Participants were asked to wear each respirator in a random order while a series of measurements were recorded, including interface pressure, temperature and relative humidity. Measures of transepidermal water loss and skin hydration were assessed pre- and post-respirator application, and after 20 minutes of recovery. Statistical analysis assessed differences between respirator designs and associations between demographics, interface conditions and parameters of skin health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed a statistically significant negative correlation (p < 0.05) between the alar width and interface pressures at the nasal bridge, for three of the respirator designs. The nasal bridge site also corresponded to the highest pressures for all respirator designs. Temperature and humidity significantly increased (p < 0.05) during each respirator application. Significant increases in transepidermal water loss values (p < 0.05) were observed after the application of the respirators in females, which were most apparent at the nasal bridge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results revealed that specific facial features affected the distribution of interface pressures and depending on the respirator design and material, changes in skin barrier function were evident. The development of respirator designs that accommodate a diverse range of face shapes and protect the end users from skin damage are required to support the long-term use of these devices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"241-252\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9343257/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S370142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S370142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:在医疗机构中广泛使用呼吸防护设备,以保护临床医生治疗COVID-19患者。然而,他们的通用设计并不能适应不同性别和种族的脸型差异。因此,他们经常过度收紧,以弥补不合适的。本研究旨在探讨呼吸器使用过程中的生物力学和热负荷以及皮肤-装置界面局部皮肤生理的相关变化。材料和方法:招募了16名健康志愿者,反映了一系列性别、种族和面部人体测量学。评估了代表不同几何形状、尺寸和材料界面的四种一次性呼吸器。参与者被要求按随机顺序佩戴每个呼吸器,同时记录一系列测量数据,包括界面压力、温度和相对湿度。在使用呼吸器前后和恢复20分钟后,评估经皮失水和皮肤水化的测量。统计分析评估了呼吸器设计之间的差异以及人口统计学、界面条件和皮肤健康参数之间的关联。结果:三种呼吸器的鼻翼宽度与鼻梁界面压力呈显著负相关(p < 0.05)。鼻桥部位也与所有呼吸器设计的最高压力相对应。每次使用时,温度和湿度均显著升高(p < 0.05)。女性患者在使用呼吸器后,经皮失水值显著升高(p < 0.05),且以鼻梁部位最为明显。结论:特定的面部特征影响了界面压力的分布,根据呼吸器的设计和材料,皮肤屏障功能的变化是明显的。为了支持这些设备的长期使用,需要开发适应各种脸型并保护最终用户免受皮肤损伤的呼吸器设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Biomechanical and Physiological Evaluation of Respiratory Protective Equipment Application.

Biomechanical and Physiological Evaluation of Respiratory Protective Equipment Application.

Biomechanical and Physiological Evaluation of Respiratory Protective Equipment Application.

Biomechanical and Physiological Evaluation of Respiratory Protective Equipment Application.

Purpose: Respiratory protective equipment is widely used in healthcare settings to protect clinicians whilst treating patients with COVID-19. However, their generic designs do not accommodate the variability in face shape across genders and ethnicities. Accordingly, they are regularly overtightened to compensate for a poor fit. The present study aims at investigating the biomechanical and thermal loads during respirator application and the associated changes in local skin physiology at the skin-device interface.

Materials and methods: Sixteen healthy volunteers were recruited and reflected a range of gender, ethnicities and facial anthropometrics. Four single-use respirators were evaluated representing different geometries, size and material interfaces. Participants were asked to wear each respirator in a random order while a series of measurements were recorded, including interface pressure, temperature and relative humidity. Measures of transepidermal water loss and skin hydration were assessed pre- and post-respirator application, and after 20 minutes of recovery. Statistical analysis assessed differences between respirator designs and associations between demographics, interface conditions and parameters of skin health.

Results: Results showed a statistically significant negative correlation (p < 0.05) between the alar width and interface pressures at the nasal bridge, for three of the respirator designs. The nasal bridge site also corresponded to the highest pressures for all respirator designs. Temperature and humidity significantly increased (p < 0.05) during each respirator application. Significant increases in transepidermal water loss values (p < 0.05) were observed after the application of the respirators in females, which were most apparent at the nasal bridge.

Conclusion: The results revealed that specific facial features affected the distribution of interface pressures and depending on the respirator design and material, changes in skin barrier function were evident. The development of respirator designs that accommodate a diverse range of face shapes and protect the end users from skin damage are required to support the long-term use of these devices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信