利用电子健康记录的主动监控评估椎体间植入物的性能。

IF 2.1 Q2 SURGERY
BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies Pub Date : 2022-07-08 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000125
Edward A Frankenberger, Frederic S Resnic, Henry Ssemaganda, Susan Robbins, Melissa R Dunbar, Paul Coplan, Shumin Zhang, Cortney Bruno, Mitchell Maltenfort, Jillian B Benedetti, Michael E Matheny, Zoher Ghogawala
{"title":"利用电子健康记录的主动监控评估椎体间植入物的性能。","authors":"Edward A Frankenberger, Frederic S Resnic, Henry Ssemaganda, Susan Robbins, Melissa R Dunbar, Paul Coplan, Shumin Zhang, Cortney Bruno, Mitchell Maltenfort, Jillian B Benedetti, Michael E Matheny, Zoher Ghogawala","doi":"10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the feasibility of using electronic health record (EHR) derived clinical data within an active surveillance setting to evaluate the safety of a novel intervertebral body implant (IVBI) stabilization device.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective, longitudinal observational cohort study comparing clinical outcomes for patients seen through 1 year following spinal fusion surgery.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Lahey Health network, which includes academic tertiary hospitals, outpatient clinics, and independent provider offices in the New England region of the USA.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>All spine surgery patients aged 18 or older who underwent thoracic or lumbar spinal arthrodesis surgeries were included.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The clinical outcomes of patients treated with the CONCORDE Bullet (CB) interbody spine system (DePuy) between April 2015 and December 2018 were compared with those patients receiving alternative spine stabilization interbody device implants. The primary endpoint was reoperation rate at 1 year, with secondary endpoints including the requirement for blood transfusion during index hospitalization, 1 year rate of any cause hospitalization, 1 year rate of surgical site infection, and mortality at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 606 patients undergoing thoracic or lumbar spinal fusion surgery during the study period, 136 received only the CB. In comparison with patients who did not receive the CB, no significant differences were found in the rate of reoperation at 1 year or the rates of secondary safety outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Data derived from the EHR can be successfully leveraged to assess the safety of IVBI devices, in this case demonstrating no significant differences in the rates of risk-adjusted safety endpoints between patients undergoing spinal surgery with the CB as compared with alternative spinal implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/22/5d/bmjsit-2021-000125.PMC9272102.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of intervertebral body implant performance using active surveillance of electronic health records.\",\"authors\":\"Edward A Frankenberger, Frederic S Resnic, Henry Ssemaganda, Susan Robbins, Melissa R Dunbar, Paul Coplan, Shumin Zhang, Cortney Bruno, Mitchell Maltenfort, Jillian B Benedetti, Michael E Matheny, Zoher Ghogawala\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the feasibility of using electronic health record (EHR) derived clinical data within an active surveillance setting to evaluate the safety of a novel intervertebral body implant (IVBI) stabilization device.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective, longitudinal observational cohort study comparing clinical outcomes for patients seen through 1 year following spinal fusion surgery.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Lahey Health network, which includes academic tertiary hospitals, outpatient clinics, and independent provider offices in the New England region of the USA.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>All spine surgery patients aged 18 or older who underwent thoracic or lumbar spinal arthrodesis surgeries were included.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The clinical outcomes of patients treated with the CONCORDE Bullet (CB) interbody spine system (DePuy) between April 2015 and December 2018 were compared with those patients receiving alternative spine stabilization interbody device implants. The primary endpoint was reoperation rate at 1 year, with secondary endpoints including the requirement for blood transfusion during index hospitalization, 1 year rate of any cause hospitalization, 1 year rate of surgical site infection, and mortality at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 606 patients undergoing thoracic or lumbar spinal fusion surgery during the study period, 136 received only the CB. In comparison with patients who did not receive the CB, no significant differences were found in the rate of reoperation at 1 year or the rates of secondary safety outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Data derived from the EHR can be successfully leveraged to assess the safety of IVBI devices, in this case demonstrating no significant differences in the rates of risk-adjusted safety endpoints between patients undergoing spinal surgery with the CB as compared with alternative spinal implants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/22/5d/bmjsit-2021-000125.PMC9272102.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估在主动监测环境下使用电子健康记录(EHR)衍生临床数据评估新型椎体间植入物(IVBI)稳定装置安全性的可行性:设计:回顾性纵向观察队列研究,比较脊柱融合手术后一年内患者的临床疗效:拉黑健康网络,包括美国新英格兰地区的三级学术医院、门诊诊所和独立医疗机构:主要结果测量指标:将2015年4月至2018年12月期间接受CONCORDE Bullet (CB)椎间孔镜系统(DePuy)治疗的患者的临床结果与接受其他脊柱稳定椎间孔镜植入物治疗的患者的临床结果进行比较。主要终点是1年后的再手术率,次要终点包括指数住院期间的输血需求、1年后的任何原因住院率、1年后的手术部位感染率和1年后的死亡率:在研究期间接受胸椎或腰椎融合手术的 606 名患者中,有 136 人只接受了 CB 治疗。与未接受 CB 治疗的患者相比,1 年后再次手术率或次要安全性结果的发生率均无明显差异:结论:从电子病历中获得的数据可成功用于评估 IVBI 设备的安全性,在本病例中,使用 CB 的脊柱手术患者与使用其他脊柱植入物的患者在风险调整后的安全终点率方面没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of intervertebral body implant performance using active surveillance of electronic health records.

Objectives: To assess the feasibility of using electronic health record (EHR) derived clinical data within an active surveillance setting to evaluate the safety of a novel intervertebral body implant (IVBI) stabilization device.

Design: Retrospective, longitudinal observational cohort study comparing clinical outcomes for patients seen through 1 year following spinal fusion surgery.

Setting: Lahey Health network, which includes academic tertiary hospitals, outpatient clinics, and independent provider offices in the New England region of the USA.

Participants: All spine surgery patients aged 18 or older who underwent thoracic or lumbar spinal arthrodesis surgeries were included.

Main outcome measures: The clinical outcomes of patients treated with the CONCORDE Bullet (CB) interbody spine system (DePuy) between April 2015 and December 2018 were compared with those patients receiving alternative spine stabilization interbody device implants. The primary endpoint was reoperation rate at 1 year, with secondary endpoints including the requirement for blood transfusion during index hospitalization, 1 year rate of any cause hospitalization, 1 year rate of surgical site infection, and mortality at 1 year.

Results: Among the 606 patients undergoing thoracic or lumbar spinal fusion surgery during the study period, 136 received only the CB. In comparison with patients who did not receive the CB, no significant differences were found in the rate of reoperation at 1 year or the rates of secondary safety outcomes.

Conclusions: Data derived from the EHR can be successfully leveraged to assess the safety of IVBI devices, in this case demonstrating no significant differences in the rates of risk-adjusted safety endpoints between patients undergoing spinal surgery with the CB as compared with alternative spinal implants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信