野战医院的选址标准:系统回顾。

IF 2.4 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Promotion Perspectives Pub Date : 2022-08-20 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.34172/hpp.2022.17
Keyvan Fardi, Ghader Ghanizadeh, Mohammadkarim Bahadori, Samaneh Chaharbaghi, Sayyed Morteza Hosseini Shokouh
{"title":"野战医院的选址标准:系统回顾。","authors":"Keyvan Fardi, Ghader Ghanizadeh, Mohammadkarim Bahadori, Samaneh Chaharbaghi, Sayyed Morteza Hosseini Shokouh","doi":"10.34172/hpp.2022.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Establishing field hospitals is a critical task for governments to complete following disasters, with the first step being to identify suitable locations. Although field hospitals are similar to permanent hospitals and temporary shelters, no research in English has been conducted to extract the location selection criteria for field hospitals from those for hospitals and temporary shelters. <b>Methods:</b> A meta-synthetic approach was used to review all related qualitative, quantitative, and mixed studies published in English between January 2010 and June 2020 to identify new field hospital site selection criteria distinct from those used to select a permanent hospital and temporary sheltering sites. <b>Results:</b> From 4317 screened records, 24 articles were eventually identified as eligible studies, through which 151 open codes, 21 axial codes, and nine themes were identified. The top three axes included proximity to main roads, proximity/distance to permanent hospitals, and proximity/distance to other medical centers. <b>Conclusion:</b> By considering a field hospital as a facility with certain characteristics similar to permanent hospitals and temporary shelters, it is possible to identify specific new criteria and sub-criteria by extracting items common to permanent hospitals and temporary shelter site selection studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":46588,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Perspectives","volume":"12 2","pages":"131-140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508390/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Location selection criteria for field hospitals: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Keyvan Fardi, Ghader Ghanizadeh, Mohammadkarim Bahadori, Samaneh Chaharbaghi, Sayyed Morteza Hosseini Shokouh\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/hpp.2022.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Establishing field hospitals is a critical task for governments to complete following disasters, with the first step being to identify suitable locations. Although field hospitals are similar to permanent hospitals and temporary shelters, no research in English has been conducted to extract the location selection criteria for field hospitals from those for hospitals and temporary shelters. <b>Methods:</b> A meta-synthetic approach was used to review all related qualitative, quantitative, and mixed studies published in English between January 2010 and June 2020 to identify new field hospital site selection criteria distinct from those used to select a permanent hospital and temporary sheltering sites. <b>Results:</b> From 4317 screened records, 24 articles were eventually identified as eligible studies, through which 151 open codes, 21 axial codes, and nine themes were identified. The top three axes included proximity to main roads, proximity/distance to permanent hospitals, and proximity/distance to other medical centers. <b>Conclusion:</b> By considering a field hospital as a facility with certain characteristics similar to permanent hospitals and temporary shelters, it is possible to identify specific new criteria and sub-criteria by extracting items common to permanent hospitals and temporary shelter site selection studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"131-140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508390/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.2022.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.2022.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:建立野战医院是灾后政府需要完成的一项重要任务,第一步是确定合适的地点。虽然野战医院与永久性医院和临时避难所类似,但目前还没有英语研究从医院和临时避难所的选址标准中提取出野战医院的选址标准。研究方法:采用元合成方法,回顾了 2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 6 月间用英语发表的所有相关定性、定量和混合研究,以确定有别于永久性医院和临时避难所选址标准的新野战医院选址标准。结果:从 4317 条筛选记录中,最终确定 24 篇文章为合格研究,通过这些研究确定了 151 个开放代码、21 个轴向代码和 9 个主题。排在前三位的主轴包括距离主干道的远近、距离永久性医院的远近以及距离其他医疗中心的远近。结论通过将野战医院视为具有与永久性医院和临时避难所相似的某些特征的设施,可以通过提取永久性医院和临时避难所选址研究中常见的项目来确定特定的新标准和次级标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Location selection criteria for field hospitals: A systematic review.

Location selection criteria for field hospitals: A systematic review.

Location selection criteria for field hospitals: A systematic review.

Location selection criteria for field hospitals: A systematic review.

Background: Establishing field hospitals is a critical task for governments to complete following disasters, with the first step being to identify suitable locations. Although field hospitals are similar to permanent hospitals and temporary shelters, no research in English has been conducted to extract the location selection criteria for field hospitals from those for hospitals and temporary shelters. Methods: A meta-synthetic approach was used to review all related qualitative, quantitative, and mixed studies published in English between January 2010 and June 2020 to identify new field hospital site selection criteria distinct from those used to select a permanent hospital and temporary sheltering sites. Results: From 4317 screened records, 24 articles were eventually identified as eligible studies, through which 151 open codes, 21 axial codes, and nine themes were identified. The top three axes included proximity to main roads, proximity/distance to permanent hospitals, and proximity/distance to other medical centers. Conclusion: By considering a field hospital as a facility with certain characteristics similar to permanent hospitals and temporary shelters, it is possible to identify specific new criteria and sub-criteria by extracting items common to permanent hospitals and temporary shelter site selection studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion Perspectives
Health Promotion Perspectives PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信