慢性腰痛和中枢敏化患者的睡眠质量。

Kosaku Aoyagi, Jianghua He, Daniel J Clauw, Neena K Sharma
{"title":"慢性腰痛和中枢敏化患者的睡眠质量。","authors":"Kosaku Aoyagi,&nbsp;Jianghua He,&nbsp;Daniel J Clauw,&nbsp;Neena K Sharma","doi":"10.1002/pri.1968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Sleep problems are common in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Central sensitization (CS) is present in a subgroup of individuals with CLBP. However, our knowledge about whether sleep quality varies between the subgroups of CLBP is limited. Therefore, we sought to examine whether the subgroup of CLBP with CS has poorer sleep quality than the subgroup without CS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>2011 Fibromyalgia Survey (2011 FM survey) was used as a surrogate measure of CS to divide the CLBP participants into two subgroups: CLBP with CS and CLBP without CS. We also created a CS index comprising a set of quantitative sensory testing measures (i.e., pressure pain thresholds, conditioned pain modulation) to evaluate pain sensitivity. Sleep quality was assessed with Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Group differences about PSQI and CS index and associations between sleep quality and CS across the groups were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 60 participants with CLBP and 23 healthy controls (HCs). Overall, 80% of the participants with CLBP presented with poor sleep quality. Participants with CLBP with CS showed significantly higher PSQI scores (poorer sleep) than participants with CLBP without CS and HCs (p < 0.05). Both the 2011 FM survey and CS index were significantly correlated with sleep quality (r = 0.5870, p < 0.001 and r = -0.264, p = 0.04). Logistic regression models revealed that the FM status (odds ratio (OR) = 6.00, p = 0.02 [95% confidence interval: 1.31-42.1]), but not the CS index (OR = 1.11, p = 0.79 [95% CI: 0.48-2.71]) was associated with PSQI. After adjusting covariates, the results remained similar but became non-significant for the FM status.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We found that sleep problems were more common and severe in those who exhibited signs of CS. Thus, clinicians may consider using 2011 FM survey to identify those with CS and co-existing sleep problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":519522,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy","volume":" ","pages":"e1968"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sleep quality in individuals with chronic low back pain and central sensitization.\",\"authors\":\"Kosaku Aoyagi,&nbsp;Jianghua He,&nbsp;Daniel J Clauw,&nbsp;Neena K Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pri.1968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Sleep problems are common in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Central sensitization (CS) is present in a subgroup of individuals with CLBP. However, our knowledge about whether sleep quality varies between the subgroups of CLBP is limited. Therefore, we sought to examine whether the subgroup of CLBP with CS has poorer sleep quality than the subgroup without CS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>2011 Fibromyalgia Survey (2011 FM survey) was used as a surrogate measure of CS to divide the CLBP participants into two subgroups: CLBP with CS and CLBP without CS. We also created a CS index comprising a set of quantitative sensory testing measures (i.e., pressure pain thresholds, conditioned pain modulation) to evaluate pain sensitivity. Sleep quality was assessed with Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Group differences about PSQI and CS index and associations between sleep quality and CS across the groups were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 60 participants with CLBP and 23 healthy controls (HCs). Overall, 80% of the participants with CLBP presented with poor sleep quality. Participants with CLBP with CS showed significantly higher PSQI scores (poorer sleep) than participants with CLBP without CS and HCs (p < 0.05). Both the 2011 FM survey and CS index were significantly correlated with sleep quality (r = 0.5870, p < 0.001 and r = -0.264, p = 0.04). Logistic regression models revealed that the FM status (odds ratio (OR) = 6.00, p = 0.02 [95% confidence interval: 1.31-42.1]), but not the CS index (OR = 1.11, p = 0.79 [95% CI: 0.48-2.71]) was associated with PSQI. After adjusting covariates, the results remained similar but became non-significant for the FM status.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We found that sleep problems were more common and severe in those who exhibited signs of CS. Thus, clinicians may consider using 2011 FM survey to identify those with CS and co-existing sleep problems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e1968\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1968\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景和目的:睡眠问题在慢性腰痛(CLBP)患者中很常见。中枢致敏(CS)存在于CLBP患者亚组中。然而,我们对睡眠质量在CLBP亚组之间是否存在差异的了解是有限的。因此,我们试图检验有CS的CLBP亚组是否比没有CS的亚组睡眠质量更差。方法:使用2011纤维肌痛调查(2011 FM调查)作为CS的替代测量,将CLBP参与者分为两个亚组:CLBP合并CS和CLBP无CS。我们还创建了一个CS指数,包括一组定量的感官测试措施(即,压力疼痛阈值,条件疼痛调节)来评估疼痛敏感性。采用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)评价睡眠质量。分析各组间PSQI、CS指数的组间差异及睡眠质量与CS的相关性。结果:我们纳入了60名CLBP患者和23名健康对照(hc)。总体而言,80%的CLBP患者睡眠质量较差。伴有CS的CLBP患者的PSQI评分明显高于不伴有CS和hc的CLBP患者(p讨论:我们发现睡眠问题在表现出CS症状的患者中更为常见和严重。因此,临床医生可以考虑使用2011年FM调查来识别CS和共存睡眠问题的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sleep quality in individuals with chronic low back pain and central sensitization.

Background and purpose: Sleep problems are common in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Central sensitization (CS) is present in a subgroup of individuals with CLBP. However, our knowledge about whether sleep quality varies between the subgroups of CLBP is limited. Therefore, we sought to examine whether the subgroup of CLBP with CS has poorer sleep quality than the subgroup without CS.

Methods: 2011 Fibromyalgia Survey (2011 FM survey) was used as a surrogate measure of CS to divide the CLBP participants into two subgroups: CLBP with CS and CLBP without CS. We also created a CS index comprising a set of quantitative sensory testing measures (i.e., pressure pain thresholds, conditioned pain modulation) to evaluate pain sensitivity. Sleep quality was assessed with Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Group differences about PSQI and CS index and associations between sleep quality and CS across the groups were analyzed.

Results: We included 60 participants with CLBP and 23 healthy controls (HCs). Overall, 80% of the participants with CLBP presented with poor sleep quality. Participants with CLBP with CS showed significantly higher PSQI scores (poorer sleep) than participants with CLBP without CS and HCs (p < 0.05). Both the 2011 FM survey and CS index were significantly correlated with sleep quality (r = 0.5870, p < 0.001 and r = -0.264, p = 0.04). Logistic regression models revealed that the FM status (odds ratio (OR) = 6.00, p = 0.02 [95% confidence interval: 1.31-42.1]), but not the CS index (OR = 1.11, p = 0.79 [95% CI: 0.48-2.71]) was associated with PSQI. After adjusting covariates, the results remained similar but became non-significant for the FM status.

Discussion: We found that sleep problems were more common and severe in those who exhibited signs of CS. Thus, clinicians may consider using 2011 FM survey to identify those with CS and co-existing sleep problems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信