小儿复杂急性阑尾炎:管理抗生素处方的重要性。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PEDIATRICS
Filippo Ghidini, Calogero Virgone, Daniele Donà, Anna Chiara Frigo, Francesco Fascetti Leon, Piergiorgio Gamba
{"title":"小儿复杂急性阑尾炎:管理抗生素处方的重要性。","authors":"Filippo Ghidini,&nbsp;Calogero Virgone,&nbsp;Daniele Donà,&nbsp;Anna Chiara Frigo,&nbsp;Francesco Fascetti Leon,&nbsp;Piergiorgio Gamba","doi":"10.24953/turkjped.2022.247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim was to assess the success of a three-drug regimen, consisting of cefazoline, metronidazole and gentamicine, for the antimicrobial treatment of complicated appendicitis and to investigate predictors of failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients who had undergone appendectomy for complicated appendicitis from 2013 to 2018. The shift to second-line antibiotics was considered a failure. The choice was based upon clinical deterioration. Patients were grouped into 2 groups: localized complicated appendicitis (LCA) and extensively complicated appendicitis (ECA) for the study purpose. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify predictors of failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety patients (65.2%) with LCA and 48 patients (35%) with ECA were included. Three-drug regimen failed in 50 patients (36%) with a higher rate in the ECA group (50%, p=0.017). In a multivariate analysis, this failure was found to be associated with ECA (adjusted OR 3.00 [1.2-7.4], p=0.041). Children with ECA experienced a longer hospital stay (median length 8 days, p &lt; 0.001) and antimicrobial therapy (median length 8 days, p &lt; 0.001). However, no difference in the rate of surgical site infections was found (p=0.514).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The institutional antibiotic stewardship program highlighted a high failure rate for the old threedrug regimen. A new protocol should be recommended, especially for the patients affected by ECA.</p>","PeriodicalId":49409,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"64 5","pages":"839-847"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complicated acute appendicitis in children: the importance of stewarding antibiotic prescriptions.\",\"authors\":\"Filippo Ghidini,&nbsp;Calogero Virgone,&nbsp;Daniele Donà,&nbsp;Anna Chiara Frigo,&nbsp;Francesco Fascetti Leon,&nbsp;Piergiorgio Gamba\",\"doi\":\"10.24953/turkjped.2022.247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim was to assess the success of a three-drug regimen, consisting of cefazoline, metronidazole and gentamicine, for the antimicrobial treatment of complicated appendicitis and to investigate predictors of failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients who had undergone appendectomy for complicated appendicitis from 2013 to 2018. The shift to second-line antibiotics was considered a failure. The choice was based upon clinical deterioration. Patients were grouped into 2 groups: localized complicated appendicitis (LCA) and extensively complicated appendicitis (ECA) for the study purpose. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify predictors of failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety patients (65.2%) with LCA and 48 patients (35%) with ECA were included. Three-drug regimen failed in 50 patients (36%) with a higher rate in the ECA group (50%, p=0.017). In a multivariate analysis, this failure was found to be associated with ECA (adjusted OR 3.00 [1.2-7.4], p=0.041). Children with ECA experienced a longer hospital stay (median length 8 days, p &lt; 0.001) and antimicrobial therapy (median length 8 days, p &lt; 0.001). However, no difference in the rate of surgical site infections was found (p=0.514).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The institutional antibiotic stewardship program highlighted a high failure rate for the old threedrug regimen. A new protocol should be recommended, especially for the patients affected by ECA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"64 5\",\"pages\":\"839-847\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24953/turkjped.2022.247\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24953/turkjped.2022.247","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的是评估由头孢唑啉、甲硝唑和庆大霉素组成的三药方案在复杂阑尾炎抗菌治疗中的成功,并探讨失败的预测因素。方法:回顾性研究2013 - 2018年因复杂性阑尾炎行阑尾切除术的患者。转向二线抗生素被认为是失败的。选择是基于临床恶化。将患者分为局限性复杂阑尾炎(LCA)和广泛性复杂阑尾炎(ECA)两组。进行单因素和多因素分析以确定失败的预测因素。结果:纳入LCA 90例(65.2%),ECA 48例(35%)。三药方案失败50例(36%),ECA组失败率更高(50%,p=0.017)。在多变量分析中,发现这种失败与ECA相关(调整后OR为3.00 [1.2-7.4],p=0.041)。ECA患儿住院时间较长(中位数为8天,p <0.001)和抗菌药物治疗(中位时间8天,p <0.001)。但两组手术部位感染率无显著差异(p=0.514)。结论:机构抗生素管理计划强调了旧三药方案的高失败率。应推荐一种新的方案,特别是对于受ECA影响的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Complicated acute appendicitis in children: the importance of stewarding antibiotic prescriptions.

Background: The aim was to assess the success of a three-drug regimen, consisting of cefazoline, metronidazole and gentamicine, for the antimicrobial treatment of complicated appendicitis and to investigate predictors of failure.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients who had undergone appendectomy for complicated appendicitis from 2013 to 2018. The shift to second-line antibiotics was considered a failure. The choice was based upon clinical deterioration. Patients were grouped into 2 groups: localized complicated appendicitis (LCA) and extensively complicated appendicitis (ECA) for the study purpose. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify predictors of failure.

Results: Ninety patients (65.2%) with LCA and 48 patients (35%) with ECA were included. Three-drug regimen failed in 50 patients (36%) with a higher rate in the ECA group (50%, p=0.017). In a multivariate analysis, this failure was found to be associated with ECA (adjusted OR 3.00 [1.2-7.4], p=0.041). Children with ECA experienced a longer hospital stay (median length 8 days, p < 0.001) and antimicrobial therapy (median length 8 days, p < 0.001). However, no difference in the rate of surgical site infections was found (p=0.514).

Conclusions: The institutional antibiotic stewardship program highlighted a high failure rate for the old threedrug regimen. A new protocol should be recommended, especially for the patients affected by ECA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
122
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics is a multidisciplinary, peer reviewed, open access journal that seeks to publish research to advance the field of Pediatrics. The Journal publishes original articles, case reports, review of the literature, short communications, clinicopathological exercises and letter to the editor in the field of pediatrics. Articles published in this journal are evaluated in an independent and unbiased, double blinded peer-reviewed fashion by an advisory committee.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信