改善多病患者健康相关生活质量、心理健康或死亡率的护理模式:随机对照试验的系统回顾。

Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity Pub Date : 2022-10-27 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26335565221134017
Christian U Eriksen, Nina Kamstrup-Larsen, Hanne Birke, Sofie A L Helding, Nermin Ghith, John S Andersen, Anne Frølich
{"title":"改善多病患者健康相关生活质量、心理健康或死亡率的护理模式:随机对照试验的系统回顾。","authors":"Christian U Eriksen, Nina Kamstrup-Larsen, Hanne Birke, Sofie A L Helding, Nermin Ghith, John S Andersen, Anne Frølich","doi":"10.1177/26335565221134017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To categorize and examine the effectiveness regarding health-related quality of life (HRQoL), mental health, and mortality of care models for persons with multimorbidity in primary care, community care, and hospitals through a systematic review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to May 2020. One author screened titles and abstracts, and to validate, a second author screened 5% of the studies. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the tool by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care group. Study inclusion criteria were (1) participants aged ≥ 18 years with multimorbidity; (2) referred to multimorbidity or two or more specific chronic conditions in the title or abstract; (3) randomized controlled design; and (4) HRQoL, mental health, or mortality as primary outcome measures. We used the Foundation Framework to categorize the models and the PRISMA-guideline for reporting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, the first to report effectiveness of care models in patients with multimorbidity in hospital settings, we included 30 studies and 9,777 participants with multimorbidity. 12 studies were located in primary care, 9 in community care, and 9 in hospitals. HRQoL was reported as the primary outcome in 12 studies, mental health in 17 studies, and mortality in three studies-with significant improvements in 5, 14, and 2, respectively. The studies are presented according to settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although 20 of the care models reported positive effects, the variations in populations, settings, model elements, and outcome measures made it difficult to conclude on which models and model elements were effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":73843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity","volume":" ","pages":"26335565221134017"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/14/66/10.1177_26335565221134017.PMC9618762.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Models of care for improving health-related quality of life, mental health, or mortality in persons with multimorbidity: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Christian U Eriksen, Nina Kamstrup-Larsen, Hanne Birke, Sofie A L Helding, Nermin Ghith, John S Andersen, Anne Frølich\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26335565221134017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To categorize and examine the effectiveness regarding health-related quality of life (HRQoL), mental health, and mortality of care models for persons with multimorbidity in primary care, community care, and hospitals through a systematic review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to May 2020. One author screened titles and abstracts, and to validate, a second author screened 5% of the studies. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the tool by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care group. Study inclusion criteria were (1) participants aged ≥ 18 years with multimorbidity; (2) referred to multimorbidity or two or more specific chronic conditions in the title or abstract; (3) randomized controlled design; and (4) HRQoL, mental health, or mortality as primary outcome measures. We used the Foundation Framework to categorize the models and the PRISMA-guideline for reporting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, the first to report effectiveness of care models in patients with multimorbidity in hospital settings, we included 30 studies and 9,777 participants with multimorbidity. 12 studies were located in primary care, 9 in community care, and 9 in hospitals. HRQoL was reported as the primary outcome in 12 studies, mental health in 17 studies, and mortality in three studies-with significant improvements in 5, 14, and 2, respectively. The studies are presented according to settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although 20 of the care models reported positive effects, the variations in populations, settings, model elements, and outcome measures made it difficult to conclude on which models and model elements were effective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"26335565221134017\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/14/66/10.1177_26335565221134017.PMC9618762.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26335565221134017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26335565221134017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的通过系统性综述,对初级医疗、社区医疗和医院中针对多病患者的护理模式在健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)、心理健康和死亡率方面的有效性进行分类和研究:我们检索了截至 2020 年 5 月的 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials。一位作者筛选了标题和摘要,为了验证,第二位作者筛选了5%的研究。两位作者独立提取数据,并使用 Cochrane 有效实践与护理组织小组的工具评估偏倚风险。研究纳入标准为:(1)参与者年龄≥ 18 岁,患有多病症;(2)标题或摘要中提及多病症或两种或两种以上特定慢性疾病;(3)随机对照设计;(4)以 HRQoL、心理健康或死亡率作为主要结局测量指标。我们使用基础框架对模型进行分类,并使用 PRISMA 指南进行报告:本研究首次报告了护理模式对医院环境中多发病患者的疗效,共纳入 30 项研究和 9777 名多发病患者。其中 12 项研究位于初级医疗机构,9 项研究位于社区医疗机构,9 项研究位于医院。有 12 项研究将 HRQoL 作为主要结果,有 17 项研究将心理健康作为主要结果,有 3 项研究将死亡率作为主要结果--分别有 5 项、14 项和 2 项研究的结果有显著改善。这些研究按照不同的环境进行了介绍:尽管有 20 种护理模式报告了积极的效果,但由于人群、环境、模式要素和结果测量的不同,很难就哪些模式和模式要素是有效的得出结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Models of care for improving health-related quality of life, mental health, or mortality in persons with multimorbidity: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Models of care for improving health-related quality of life, mental health, or mortality in persons with multimorbidity: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Models of care for improving health-related quality of life, mental health, or mortality in persons with multimorbidity: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Models of care for improving health-related quality of life, mental health, or mortality in persons with multimorbidity: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Objectives: To categorize and examine the effectiveness regarding health-related quality of life (HRQoL), mental health, and mortality of care models for persons with multimorbidity in primary care, community care, and hospitals through a systematic review.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to May 2020. One author screened titles and abstracts, and to validate, a second author screened 5% of the studies. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the tool by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care group. Study inclusion criteria were (1) participants aged ≥ 18 years with multimorbidity; (2) referred to multimorbidity or two or more specific chronic conditions in the title or abstract; (3) randomized controlled design; and (4) HRQoL, mental health, or mortality as primary outcome measures. We used the Foundation Framework to categorize the models and the PRISMA-guideline for reporting.

Results: In this study, the first to report effectiveness of care models in patients with multimorbidity in hospital settings, we included 30 studies and 9,777 participants with multimorbidity. 12 studies were located in primary care, 9 in community care, and 9 in hospitals. HRQoL was reported as the primary outcome in 12 studies, mental health in 17 studies, and mortality in three studies-with significant improvements in 5, 14, and 2, respectively. The studies are presented according to settings.

Conclusions: Although 20 of the care models reported positive effects, the variations in populations, settings, model elements, and outcome measures made it difficult to conclude on which models and model elements were effective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信