堕胎法中健康意义的理论化。

Timothy F Murphy
{"title":"堕胎法中健康意义的理论化。","authors":"Timothy F Murphy","doi":"10.1080/15265161.2022.2089272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"means actively pursuing opportunities to talk to others about their beliefs, to find ways to trust members of epistemic cliques that you do not identify with, and to share information with them and to process the information they share with you. Finally, their models provide a warning—to watch out for propagandists who aim to misinform while simulating the methods of an epistemic community, rather than to participate in deliberation about difficult concepts in good faith. That is, beware of the moments when incredulous claims are made that sound compelling enough, that invite belief and seem novel, but that, with a moment of skepticism seem incredible. Beware the jackalopes and when you hear storytellers yarn about them, speak up so that others see you modeling legitimate inquiry to the best of your abilities. Over time, we may connect enough clumpy networks that we shift the dynamic from polarization and conformity to deliberation and agreement.","PeriodicalId":145777,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of bioethics : AJOB","volume":" ","pages":"77-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theorizing the Meaning of Health in Abortion Law.\",\"authors\":\"Timothy F Murphy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15265161.2022.2089272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"means actively pursuing opportunities to talk to others about their beliefs, to find ways to trust members of epistemic cliques that you do not identify with, and to share information with them and to process the information they share with you. Finally, their models provide a warning—to watch out for propagandists who aim to misinform while simulating the methods of an epistemic community, rather than to participate in deliberation about difficult concepts in good faith. That is, beware of the moments when incredulous claims are made that sound compelling enough, that invite belief and seem novel, but that, with a moment of skepticism seem incredible. Beware the jackalopes and when you hear storytellers yarn about them, speak up so that others see you modeling legitimate inquiry to the best of your abilities. Over time, we may connect enough clumpy networks that we shift the dynamic from polarization and conformity to deliberation and agreement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":145777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American journal of bioethics : AJOB\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"77-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American journal of bioethics : AJOB\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2022.2089272\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of bioethics : AJOB","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2022.2089272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Theorizing the Meaning of Health in Abortion Law.
means actively pursuing opportunities to talk to others about their beliefs, to find ways to trust members of epistemic cliques that you do not identify with, and to share information with them and to process the information they share with you. Finally, their models provide a warning—to watch out for propagandists who aim to misinform while simulating the methods of an epistemic community, rather than to participate in deliberation about difficult concepts in good faith. That is, beware of the moments when incredulous claims are made that sound compelling enough, that invite belief and seem novel, but that, with a moment of skepticism seem incredible. Beware the jackalopes and when you hear storytellers yarn about them, speak up so that others see you modeling legitimate inquiry to the best of your abilities. Over time, we may connect enough clumpy networks that we shift the dynamic from polarization and conformity to deliberation and agreement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信