{"title":"相关性谬误与道德风险。","authors":"Stephen Napier","doi":"10.1080/15265161.2022.2089280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paltrow and colleagues (2022) focus on the deleterious consequences that could occur if Roe were overturned, including food and housing insecurity, loss of employment, bankruptcy, unjustified arrests and imprisonment, criminal surveillance, and even death. In this short response, I observe that there is no argument for the claim that Dobbs will cause such effects. I explain why the authors’ argument commits the fallacy of relevance, and I argue that the authors misunderstand the distribution of moral risk at stake in abortion.","PeriodicalId":145777,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of bioethics : AJOB","volume":" ","pages":"80-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Fallacy of Relevance and Moral Risks.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Napier\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15265161.2022.2089280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Paltrow and colleagues (2022) focus on the deleterious consequences that could occur if Roe were overturned, including food and housing insecurity, loss of employment, bankruptcy, unjustified arrests and imprisonment, criminal surveillance, and even death. In this short response, I observe that there is no argument for the claim that Dobbs will cause such effects. I explain why the authors’ argument commits the fallacy of relevance, and I argue that the authors misunderstand the distribution of moral risk at stake in abortion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":145777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American journal of bioethics : AJOB\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"80-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American journal of bioethics : AJOB\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2022.2089280\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of bioethics : AJOB","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2022.2089280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Paltrow and colleagues (2022) focus on the deleterious consequences that could occur if Roe were overturned, including food and housing insecurity, loss of employment, bankruptcy, unjustified arrests and imprisonment, criminal surveillance, and even death. In this short response, I observe that there is no argument for the claim that Dobbs will cause such effects. I explain why the authors’ argument commits the fallacy of relevance, and I argue that the authors misunderstand the distribution of moral risk at stake in abortion.