肥厚性心肌病患者左束支区起搏的初步体会。

IF 1.3
Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-09 DOI:10.1111/pace.14563
Haojie Zhu, Zhao Wang, Xiaofei Li, Yan Yao, Weijian Huang, Zhimin Liu, Xiaohan Fan
{"title":"肥厚性心肌病患者左束支区起搏的初步体会。","authors":"Haojie Zhu,&nbsp;Zhao Wang,&nbsp;Xiaofei Li,&nbsp;Yan Yao,&nbsp;Weijian Huang,&nbsp;Zhimin Liu,&nbsp;Xiaohan Fan","doi":"10.1111/pace.14563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Whether left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) could be achieved in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) requiring ventricular pacing remains unknown. The present study aimed to investigate the feasibility and effect of LBBAP in HCM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with HCM who underwent LBBAP were recruited from November 2018 to September 2021. Clinical characteristics, echocardiographic, and pacing parameters were prospectively collected at baseline and during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven consecutive HCM patients who attempted LBBAP were included (mean age 64.0 ± 8.7 years, female 45.5%, mean interventricular septum 16.7 mm). The success rate of LBBAP was 36.4% (4/11) and the reason for failed LBBAP in other seven HCM patients was the inability to screw the lead into the deep septum or capture the left bundle branch. Patients with successful LBBAP had significantly narrower QRS duration than those with failed cases (118.0 ± 3.7 ms vs. 140.9 ± 9.4 ms, p = .01) while the capture thresholds, sensing amplitudes, and pacing impedances were similar. Successful cases presented with less positive late gadolinium enhancement (25.0% vs. 71.4%, p = .02) and thinner interventricular septum thickness (14.5 ± 1.0 mm vs. 18.0 ± 2.5 mm, p = .02) compared with failed cases. Pacing parameters remained stable and no procedure-related complications occurred during a mean follow-up of 8.9 ± 7.3 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LBBAP may be successfully achieved in less than half of HCM patients due to thick interventricular septum and heavy burden of myocardial fibrosis. Pacing strategies should be cautiously considered in patients with HCM.</p>","PeriodicalId":520740,"journal":{"name":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","volume":" ","pages":"1065-1074"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The initial experience of left bundle branch area pacing in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.\",\"authors\":\"Haojie Zhu,&nbsp;Zhao Wang,&nbsp;Xiaofei Li,&nbsp;Yan Yao,&nbsp;Weijian Huang,&nbsp;Zhimin Liu,&nbsp;Xiaohan Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pace.14563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Whether left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) could be achieved in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) requiring ventricular pacing remains unknown. The present study aimed to investigate the feasibility and effect of LBBAP in HCM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with HCM who underwent LBBAP were recruited from November 2018 to September 2021. Clinical characteristics, echocardiographic, and pacing parameters were prospectively collected at baseline and during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven consecutive HCM patients who attempted LBBAP were included (mean age 64.0 ± 8.7 years, female 45.5%, mean interventricular septum 16.7 mm). The success rate of LBBAP was 36.4% (4/11) and the reason for failed LBBAP in other seven HCM patients was the inability to screw the lead into the deep septum or capture the left bundle branch. Patients with successful LBBAP had significantly narrower QRS duration than those with failed cases (118.0 ± 3.7 ms vs. 140.9 ± 9.4 ms, p = .01) while the capture thresholds, sensing amplitudes, and pacing impedances were similar. Successful cases presented with less positive late gadolinium enhancement (25.0% vs. 71.4%, p = .02) and thinner interventricular septum thickness (14.5 ± 1.0 mm vs. 18.0 ± 2.5 mm, p = .02) compared with failed cases. Pacing parameters remained stable and no procedure-related complications occurred during a mean follow-up of 8.9 ± 7.3 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LBBAP may be successfully achieved in less than half of HCM patients due to thick interventricular septum and heavy burden of myocardial fibrosis. Pacing strategies should be cautiously considered in patients with HCM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1065-1074\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.14563\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.14563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的:肥厚性心肌病(HCM)患者是否可以实现左束分支起搏(LBBAP)仍是未知的。本研究旨在探讨LBBAP治疗HCM的可行性及效果。方法:于2018年11月至2021年9月招募接受LBBAP治疗的HCM患者。在基线和随访期间前瞻性地收集临床特征、超声心动图和起搏参数。结果:纳入11例连续尝试LBBAP的HCM患者(平均年龄64.0±8.7岁,女性45.5%,平均室间隔16.7 mm)。LBBAP的成功率为36.4%(4/11),其余7例HCM患者LBBAP失败的原因是无法将导联钉入深隔或无法捕获左束支。LBBAP成功患者的QRS持续时间明显短于失败患者(118.0±3.7 ms vs 140.9±9.4 ms, p = 0.01),而捕获阈值、感应振幅和起搏阻抗相似。与失败病例相比,成功病例的晚期钆增强阳性程度较低(25.0%对71.4%,p = 0.02),室间隔厚度较薄(14.5±1.0 mm对18.0±2.5 mm, p = 0.02)。在平均8.9±7.3个月的随访中,起搏参数保持稳定,无手术相关并发症发生。结论:由于室间隔较厚,心肌纤维化负担重,LBBAP可成功治疗的HCM患者不到一半。HCM患者应谨慎考虑起搏策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The initial experience of left bundle branch area pacing in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Purpose: Whether left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) could be achieved in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) requiring ventricular pacing remains unknown. The present study aimed to investigate the feasibility and effect of LBBAP in HCM.

Methods: Patients with HCM who underwent LBBAP were recruited from November 2018 to September 2021. Clinical characteristics, echocardiographic, and pacing parameters were prospectively collected at baseline and during follow-up.

Results: Eleven consecutive HCM patients who attempted LBBAP were included (mean age 64.0 ± 8.7 years, female 45.5%, mean interventricular septum 16.7 mm). The success rate of LBBAP was 36.4% (4/11) and the reason for failed LBBAP in other seven HCM patients was the inability to screw the lead into the deep septum or capture the left bundle branch. Patients with successful LBBAP had significantly narrower QRS duration than those with failed cases (118.0 ± 3.7 ms vs. 140.9 ± 9.4 ms, p = .01) while the capture thresholds, sensing amplitudes, and pacing impedances were similar. Successful cases presented with less positive late gadolinium enhancement (25.0% vs. 71.4%, p = .02) and thinner interventricular septum thickness (14.5 ± 1.0 mm vs. 18.0 ± 2.5 mm, p = .02) compared with failed cases. Pacing parameters remained stable and no procedure-related complications occurred during a mean follow-up of 8.9 ± 7.3 months.

Conclusion: LBBAP may be successfully achieved in less than half of HCM patients due to thick interventricular septum and heavy burden of myocardial fibrosis. Pacing strategies should be cautiously considered in patients with HCM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信