机器学习预测韩国成年人的自杀意念、计划和企图:一项基于人群的研究。

SSM - Population Health Pub Date : 2022-09-14 eCollection Date: 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101231
Jeongyoon Lee, Tae-Young Pak
{"title":"机器学习预测韩国成年人的自杀意念、计划和企图:一项基于人群的研究。","authors":"Jeongyoon Lee,&nbsp;Tae-Young Pak","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Suicide remains the leading cause of premature death in South Korea. This study aims to develop machine learning algorithms for screening Korean adults at risk for suicidal ideation and suicide planning or attempt.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two sets of balanced data for Korean adults aged 19-64 years were drawn from the 2012-2019 waves of the Korea Welfare Panel Study using the random down-sampling method (<i>N</i> = 3292 for the prediction of suicidal ideation, <i>N</i> = 488 for the prediction of suicide planning or attempt). Demographic, socioeconomic, and psychosocial characteristics were used to predict suicidal ideation and suicide planning or attempt. Four machine-learning classifiers (logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, and extreme gradient boosting) were tuned and cross-validated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All four algorithms demonstrated satisfactory classification performance in predicting suicidal ideation (sensitivity 0.808-0.853, accuracy 0.843-0.863) and suicide planning or attempt (sensitivity 0.814-0.861, accuracy 0.864-0.884). Extreme gradient boosting was the best-performing algorithm for predicting both suicidal outcomes. The most important predictors were depressive symptoms, self-esteem, income, consumption, and life satisfaction. The algorithms trained with the top two predictors, depressive symptoms and self-esteem, showed comparable classification performance in predicting suicidal ideation (sensitivity 0.801-0.839, accuracy 0.841-0.846) and suicide planning or attempt (sensitivity 0.814-0.837, accuracy 0.874-0.884).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Suicidal ideation and behaviors may be under-reported due to social desirability bias. Causality is not established.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>More than 80% of individuals at risk for suicidal ideation and suicide planning or attempt could be predicted by a number of mental and socioeconomic characteristics of respondents. This finding suggests the potential of developing a quick screening tool based on the known risk factors and applying it to primary care or community settings for early intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":506314,"journal":{"name":"SSM - Population Health","volume":" ","pages":"101231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9573904/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning prediction of suicidal ideation, planning, and attempt among Korean adults: A population-based study.\",\"authors\":\"Jeongyoon Lee,&nbsp;Tae-Young Pak\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Suicide remains the leading cause of premature death in South Korea. This study aims to develop machine learning algorithms for screening Korean adults at risk for suicidal ideation and suicide planning or attempt.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two sets of balanced data for Korean adults aged 19-64 years were drawn from the 2012-2019 waves of the Korea Welfare Panel Study using the random down-sampling method (<i>N</i> = 3292 for the prediction of suicidal ideation, <i>N</i> = 488 for the prediction of suicide planning or attempt). Demographic, socioeconomic, and psychosocial characteristics were used to predict suicidal ideation and suicide planning or attempt. Four machine-learning classifiers (logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, and extreme gradient boosting) were tuned and cross-validated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All four algorithms demonstrated satisfactory classification performance in predicting suicidal ideation (sensitivity 0.808-0.853, accuracy 0.843-0.863) and suicide planning or attempt (sensitivity 0.814-0.861, accuracy 0.864-0.884). Extreme gradient boosting was the best-performing algorithm for predicting both suicidal outcomes. The most important predictors were depressive symptoms, self-esteem, income, consumption, and life satisfaction. The algorithms trained with the top two predictors, depressive symptoms and self-esteem, showed comparable classification performance in predicting suicidal ideation (sensitivity 0.801-0.839, accuracy 0.841-0.846) and suicide planning or attempt (sensitivity 0.814-0.837, accuracy 0.874-0.884).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Suicidal ideation and behaviors may be under-reported due to social desirability bias. Causality is not established.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>More than 80% of individuals at risk for suicidal ideation and suicide planning or attempt could be predicted by a number of mental and socioeconomic characteristics of respondents. This finding suggests the potential of developing a quick screening tool based on the known risk factors and applying it to primary care or community settings for early intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":506314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSM - Population Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9573904/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSM - Population Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM - Population Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:自杀仍然是韩国过早死亡的主要原因。该研究旨在开发机器学习算法,用于筛选有自杀意念、自杀计划或企图风险的韩国成年人。方法:采用随机降抽样方法,从2012-2019年韩国福利小组研究的两组韩国成年人中抽取两组平衡数据(预测自杀意念的N = 3292,预测自杀计划或企图的N = 488)。人口统计学、社会经济和社会心理特征被用来预测自杀意念和自杀计划或企图。四种机器学习分类器(逻辑回归、随机森林、支持向量机和极端梯度增强)进行了调整和交叉验证。结果:4种算法在预测自杀意念(灵敏度0.808 ~ 0.853,准确率0.843 ~ 0.863)和自杀计划或企图(灵敏度0.814 ~ 0.861,准确率0.864 ~ 0.884)方面均表现出满意的分类性能。极端梯度增强是预测两种自杀结果的最佳算法。最重要的预测因素是抑郁症状、自尊、收入、消费和生活满意度。用抑郁症状和自尊这两个最重要的预测因子训练的算法在预测自杀意念(灵敏度0.801-0.839,准确率0.841-0.846)和自杀计划或企图(灵敏度0.814-0.837,准确率0.874-0.884)方面表现出相当的分类性能。局限性:由于社会期望偏见,自杀意念和行为可能被低估。因果关系不确定。讨论:超过80%有自杀意念和自杀计划或企图风险的个体可以通过受访者的一些心理和社会经济特征来预测。这一发现表明,开发一种基于已知风险因素的快速筛查工具,并将其应用于初级保健或社区环境中进行早期干预的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Machine learning prediction of suicidal ideation, planning, and attempt among Korean adults: A population-based study.

Machine learning prediction of suicidal ideation, planning, and attempt among Korean adults: A population-based study.

Machine learning prediction of suicidal ideation, planning, and attempt among Korean adults: A population-based study.

Background: Suicide remains the leading cause of premature death in South Korea. This study aims to develop machine learning algorithms for screening Korean adults at risk for suicidal ideation and suicide planning or attempt.

Methods: Two sets of balanced data for Korean adults aged 19-64 years were drawn from the 2012-2019 waves of the Korea Welfare Panel Study using the random down-sampling method (N = 3292 for the prediction of suicidal ideation, N = 488 for the prediction of suicide planning or attempt). Demographic, socioeconomic, and psychosocial characteristics were used to predict suicidal ideation and suicide planning or attempt. Four machine-learning classifiers (logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, and extreme gradient boosting) were tuned and cross-validated.

Results: All four algorithms demonstrated satisfactory classification performance in predicting suicidal ideation (sensitivity 0.808-0.853, accuracy 0.843-0.863) and suicide planning or attempt (sensitivity 0.814-0.861, accuracy 0.864-0.884). Extreme gradient boosting was the best-performing algorithm for predicting both suicidal outcomes. The most important predictors were depressive symptoms, self-esteem, income, consumption, and life satisfaction. The algorithms trained with the top two predictors, depressive symptoms and self-esteem, showed comparable classification performance in predicting suicidal ideation (sensitivity 0.801-0.839, accuracy 0.841-0.846) and suicide planning or attempt (sensitivity 0.814-0.837, accuracy 0.874-0.884).

Limitations: Suicidal ideation and behaviors may be under-reported due to social desirability bias. Causality is not established.

Discussion: More than 80% of individuals at risk for suicidal ideation and suicide planning or attempt could be predicted by a number of mental and socioeconomic characteristics of respondents. This finding suggests the potential of developing a quick screening tool based on the known risk factors and applying it to primary care or community settings for early intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信