患有多动症的成年人与被诊断患有其他精神疾病的成年人在执行功能方面的差异:CTMT 和 WAIS-IV 的实用性。

IF 1.7 4区 心理学
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-27 DOI:10.1080/23279095.2022.2102923
Dustin Keith Shepler, P Douglas Callan
{"title":"患有多动症的成年人与被诊断患有其他精神疾病的成年人在执行功能方面的差异:CTMT 和 WAIS-IV 的实用性。","authors":"Dustin Keith Shepler, P Douglas Callan","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2022.2102923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, the utility of the Comprehensive Trail Making Test (CTMT) and WAIS-IV working memory (WMI) and processing speed (PSI) indices in assessment of ADHD were examined. Using retrospective analysis of data from two private practices, patients were classified as having ADHD, having another psychiatric disorder, or having comorbid ADHD and other psychiatric disorder. Results indicated that significant differences existed in performance across the three groups [<i>F</i>(6, 246) = 3.38, <i>p</i> = .003; Pillai's Trace = 0.152, partial <i>η</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.076] on CTMT scores (<i>p</i> < .05), WMI scores (<i>p</i> ≤ .001) and PSI scores (<i>p</i> < .05). Logistic regression analyses indicated WMI and CTMT trail 5 scores were individually useful indicators in identifying the presence of ADHD. Analysis also indicated minimal increase in correct classification of presence or absence of ADHD through combining CTMT, WMI, and PSI scores. Clinical implications for neuropsychological assessment and differential diagnosis of ADHD are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50741,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in executive functioning between adults with ADHD and those diagnosed with other psychiatric diagnoses: Utility of the CTMT and the WAIS-IV.\",\"authors\":\"Dustin Keith Shepler, P Douglas Callan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23279095.2022.2102923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this study, the utility of the Comprehensive Trail Making Test (CTMT) and WAIS-IV working memory (WMI) and processing speed (PSI) indices in assessment of ADHD were examined. Using retrospective analysis of data from two private practices, patients were classified as having ADHD, having another psychiatric disorder, or having comorbid ADHD and other psychiatric disorder. Results indicated that significant differences existed in performance across the three groups [<i>F</i>(6, 246) = 3.38, <i>p</i> = .003; Pillai's Trace = 0.152, partial <i>η</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.076] on CTMT scores (<i>p</i> < .05), WMI scores (<i>p</i> ≤ .001) and PSI scores (<i>p</i> < .05). Logistic regression analyses indicated WMI and CTMT trail 5 scores were individually useful indicators in identifying the presence of ADHD. Analysis also indicated minimal increase in correct classification of presence or absence of ADHD through combining CTMT, WMI, and PSI scores. Clinical implications for neuropsychological assessment and differential diagnosis of ADHD are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2022.2102923\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2022.2102923","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了综合寻迹测验(CTMT)和WAIS-IV工作记忆(WMI)与处理速度(PSI)指数在评估多动症中的实用性。通过对两家私人诊所的数据进行回顾性分析,将患者分为多动症患者、患有其他精神障碍的患者或合并有多动症和其他精神障碍的患者。结果显示,三组患者在 CTMT 评分(p < .05)、WMI 评分(p ≤ .001)和 PSI 评分(p < .05)上存在明显差异[F(6, 246) = 3.38, p = .003;Pillai's Trace = 0.152, partial η2 = 0.076]。逻辑回归分析表明,WMI 和 CTMT trail 5 分数是识别多动症的有效指标。分析还表明,通过结合 CTMT、WMI 和 PSI 分数,对是否存在 ADHD 的正确分类的增加幅度很小。本文讨论了神经心理学评估和多动症鉴别诊断的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences in executive functioning between adults with ADHD and those diagnosed with other psychiatric diagnoses: Utility of the CTMT and the WAIS-IV.

In this study, the utility of the Comprehensive Trail Making Test (CTMT) and WAIS-IV working memory (WMI) and processing speed (PSI) indices in assessment of ADHD were examined. Using retrospective analysis of data from two private practices, patients were classified as having ADHD, having another psychiatric disorder, or having comorbid ADHD and other psychiatric disorder. Results indicated that significant differences existed in performance across the three groups [F(6, 246) = 3.38, p = .003; Pillai's Trace = 0.152, partial η2 = 0.076] on CTMT scores (p < .05), WMI scores (p ≤ .001) and PSI scores (p < .05). Logistic regression analyses indicated WMI and CTMT trail 5 scores were individually useful indicators in identifying the presence of ADHD. Analysis also indicated minimal increase in correct classification of presence or absence of ADHD through combining CTMT, WMI, and PSI scores. Clinical implications for neuropsychological assessment and differential diagnosis of ADHD are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
自引率
11.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信