秘鲁小学教师远程工作感知量表(Tele-Cov-19)的设计与验证

Q4 Medicine
Oscar Javier Mamani-Benito, Edwuin Javier Sucapuca Quispe, Luzby Yapu Jallo, Renzo Felipe Carranza Esteban, Josué Edison Turpo Chaparro, Susana K Lingan
{"title":"秘鲁小学教师远程工作感知量表(Tele-Cov-19)的设计与验证","authors":"Oscar Javier Mamani-Benito,&nbsp;Edwuin Javier Sucapuca Quispe,&nbsp;Luzby Yapu Jallo,&nbsp;Renzo Felipe Carranza Esteban,&nbsp;Josué Edison Turpo Chaparro,&nbsp;Susana K Lingan","doi":"10.12961/aprl.2022.25.03.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To design and validate a scale of perception of teleworking in Peruvian primary schoolteachers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study of 400 primary schoolteachers (61.5% women) between 21 and 61 years of age, from six cities in Peru. Eight items were proposed, corresponding to indicators of training, safety, and flexibility of schedules, derived from the scientific literature. The scale was validated by seven experts who evaluated the relevance, representativeness and clarity of the items. Subsequently, we applied exploratory f (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), using the FACTOR Analysis program and SPSS AMOS version 21.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Aiken V indicators were statistically significant for the eight items. Before running the AFE, we calculated the KMO coefficient (0.93) and Bartlett's test (1832.9; gl = 28; p = 0.00). A single factor explained 62.27% of the total variance of the scale and its factor loadings ranged from 0.65 to 0.84. The CFA corroborated the internal structure of the scale (?2 = 58.24, df = 20, p &lt; 0.01; RMR = 0.03; TLI = 0.97; CFI = 0.97; and RMSEA = 0.06) and the reliability was acceptable (? = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.89 - 0.92).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The scale demonstrates evidence of content-based validity, internal structure and reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":38326,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales","volume":" ","pages":"259-270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Design and validation of the telework perception scale (Tele-Cov-19) in Peruvian primary schoolteachers].\",\"authors\":\"Oscar Javier Mamani-Benito,&nbsp;Edwuin Javier Sucapuca Quispe,&nbsp;Luzby Yapu Jallo,&nbsp;Renzo Felipe Carranza Esteban,&nbsp;Josué Edison Turpo Chaparro,&nbsp;Susana K Lingan\",\"doi\":\"10.12961/aprl.2022.25.03.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To design and validate a scale of perception of teleworking in Peruvian primary schoolteachers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study of 400 primary schoolteachers (61.5% women) between 21 and 61 years of age, from six cities in Peru. Eight items were proposed, corresponding to indicators of training, safety, and flexibility of schedules, derived from the scientific literature. The scale was validated by seven experts who evaluated the relevance, representativeness and clarity of the items. Subsequently, we applied exploratory f (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), using the FACTOR Analysis program and SPSS AMOS version 21.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Aiken V indicators were statistically significant for the eight items. Before running the AFE, we calculated the KMO coefficient (0.93) and Bartlett's test (1832.9; gl = 28; p = 0.00). A single factor explained 62.27% of the total variance of the scale and its factor loadings ranged from 0.65 to 0.84. The CFA corroborated the internal structure of the scale (?2 = 58.24, df = 20, p &lt; 0.01; RMR = 0.03; TLI = 0.97; CFI = 0.97; and RMSEA = 0.06) and the reliability was acceptable (? = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.89 - 0.92).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The scale demonstrates evidence of content-based validity, internal structure and reliability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"259-270\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2022.25.03.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2022.25.03.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

前言:设计并验证秘鲁小学教师远程工作感知量表。方法:这是一项来自秘鲁六个城市的400名21至61岁的小学教师(61.5%为女性)的横断面研究。根据科学文献,提出了8个项目,分别对应于培训、安全和时间表灵活性的指标。量表由7位专家验证,他们评估了项目的相关性,代表性和清晰度。随后,我们运用探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA),使用因子分析程序和SPSS AMOS version 21。结果:8项Aiken V指标均有统计学意义。在运行AFE之前,我们计算了KMO系数(0.93)和Bartlett检验(1832.9;Gl = 28;P = 0.00)。单因素解释了量表总方差的62.27%,其因子负荷范围为0.65 ~ 0.84。CFA证实了该量表的内部结构(?2 = 58.24, df = 20, p <0.01;RMR = 0.03;Tli = 0.97;Cfi = 0.97;和RMSEA = 0.06),信度可接受(?= 0.93;95% ci = 0.89 - 0.92)。结论:量表具有基于内容的效度、内部结构和信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Design and validation of the telework perception scale (Tele-Cov-19) in Peruvian primary schoolteachers].

Introduction: To design and validate a scale of perception of teleworking in Peruvian primary schoolteachers.

Method: This was a cross-sectional study of 400 primary schoolteachers (61.5% women) between 21 and 61 years of age, from six cities in Peru. Eight items were proposed, corresponding to indicators of training, safety, and flexibility of schedules, derived from the scientific literature. The scale was validated by seven experts who evaluated the relevance, representativeness and clarity of the items. Subsequently, we applied exploratory f (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), using the FACTOR Analysis program and SPSS AMOS version 21.

Results: The Aiken V indicators were statistically significant for the eight items. Before running the AFE, we calculated the KMO coefficient (0.93) and Bartlett's test (1832.9; gl = 28; p = 0.00). A single factor explained 62.27% of the total variance of the scale and its factor loadings ranged from 0.65 to 0.84. The CFA corroborated the internal structure of the scale (?2 = 58.24, df = 20, p < 0.01; RMR = 0.03; TLI = 0.97; CFI = 0.97; and RMSEA = 0.06) and the reliability was acceptable (? = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.89 - 0.92).

Conclusions: The scale demonstrates evidence of content-based validity, internal structure and reliability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信