建立医疗器械的客观性能标准。

IF 2.1 Q2 SURGERY
BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies Pub Date : 2022-08-01 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000106
Laura Elisabeth Gressler, Danica Marinac-Dabic, Susan dosReis, Philip Goodney, C Daniel Mullins, Fadia Shaya
{"title":"建立医疗器械的客观性能标准。","authors":"Laura Elisabeth Gressler,&nbsp;Danica Marinac-Dabic,&nbsp;Susan dosReis,&nbsp;Philip Goodney,&nbsp;C Daniel Mullins,&nbsp;Fadia Shaya","doi":"10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Objective performance criteria (OPC) may serve as a tool to expedite the approval process and continue active surveillance of class III medical devices. Thus far, published guidance on the creation of OPC has been clinical area-specific. This study aimed to capture reflections from key stakeholders on the creation of OPC that may serve as a precursor for a formalized conceptual framework within the USA.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Reflections from key stakeholders and guidance from an advisory committee were captured to gain an understanding of the elements that are crucial to the generation of OPC.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A non-probability sampling method using the purposive sampling strategy was employed to identify relevant stakeholders for engagement in semi-structured, open-ended, concept elicitation discussions.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Stakeholders involved in the generation of OPC.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Elements and themes regarding the priorities of, experiences with, roles within and perceived challenges associated with OPC creation captured through a phenomenological approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27 participants were engaged to represent the following contributors: representatives of registries, health systems, health technology assessment bodies, clinicians, device application reviewers, payers, patients, patient representatives, patient caregivers, device manufacturers, data coordinators, data analysts and data informaticians. Consensus was achieved on the five core elements: (1) identification of medical devices, (2) engagement of key stakeholders, (3) selection of data source, (4) performance of appropriate statistical analyses and (5) reporting of findings. The engagement of key stakeholders (38%) was cited most frequently as the most important core element. Access to meaningful and high-quality data sources (47%) was the most frequently mentioned challenge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The reflections from the participants identified five elements to be considered when generating an OPC within class III medical devices and may provide the needed foundation for the development of official guidance on OPC generation.</p>","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"e000106"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/db/7c/bmjsit-2021-000106.PMC9345051.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creation of objective performance criteria among medical devices.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Elisabeth Gressler,&nbsp;Danica Marinac-Dabic,&nbsp;Susan dosReis,&nbsp;Philip Goodney,&nbsp;C Daniel Mullins,&nbsp;Fadia Shaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Objective performance criteria (OPC) may serve as a tool to expedite the approval process and continue active surveillance of class III medical devices. Thus far, published guidance on the creation of OPC has been clinical area-specific. This study aimed to capture reflections from key stakeholders on the creation of OPC that may serve as a precursor for a formalized conceptual framework within the USA.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Reflections from key stakeholders and guidance from an advisory committee were captured to gain an understanding of the elements that are crucial to the generation of OPC.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A non-probability sampling method using the purposive sampling strategy was employed to identify relevant stakeholders for engagement in semi-structured, open-ended, concept elicitation discussions.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Stakeholders involved in the generation of OPC.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Elements and themes regarding the priorities of, experiences with, roles within and perceived challenges associated with OPC creation captured through a phenomenological approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27 participants were engaged to represent the following contributors: representatives of registries, health systems, health technology assessment bodies, clinicians, device application reviewers, payers, patients, patient representatives, patient caregivers, device manufacturers, data coordinators, data analysts and data informaticians. Consensus was achieved on the five core elements: (1) identification of medical devices, (2) engagement of key stakeholders, (3) selection of data source, (4) performance of appropriate statistical analyses and (5) reporting of findings. The engagement of key stakeholders (38%) was cited most frequently as the most important core element. Access to meaningful and high-quality data sources (47%) was the most frequently mentioned challenge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The reflections from the participants identified five elements to be considered when generating an OPC within class III medical devices and may provide the needed foundation for the development of official guidance on OPC generation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e000106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/db/7c/bmjsit-2021-000106.PMC9345051.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:客观性能标准(OPC)可以作为加快批准程序和继续对III类医疗器械进行主动监测的工具。迄今为止,已发表的关于创建OPC的指南都是针对临床领域的。本研究旨在收集主要利益相关者对OPC创建的反思,这可能会成为美国正式概念框架的先驱。设计:收集了主要利益相关者的意见和咨询委员会的指导,以了解对OPC产生至关重要的要素。设置:采用有目的抽样策略的非概率抽样方法来确定参与半结构化,开放式,概念启发讨论的相关利益相关者。参与者:参与OPC生成的利益相关者。主要成果衡量标准:通过现象学方法捕获与OPC创建相关的优先事项、经验、角色和感知挑战相关的要素和主题。结果:共有27名参与者代表以下贡献者:注册机构、卫生系统、卫生技术评估机构、临床医生、设备应用审查人员、付款人、患者、患者代表、患者护理人员、设备制造商、数据协调员、数据分析师和数据信息学家的代表。就五个核心要素达成了共识:(1)医疗器械的识别,(2)关键利益相关者的参与,(3)数据源的选择,(4)进行适当的统计分析,(5)报告调查结果。关键利益相关者的参与(38%)被认为是最重要的核心要素。获得有意义和高质量的数据源(47%)是最常被提及的挑战。结论:参与者的反思确定了在III类医疗器械中生成OPC时需要考虑的五个要素,并可能为制定OPC生成的官方指导提供所需的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Creation of objective performance criteria among medical devices.

Creation of objective performance criteria among medical devices.

Creation of objective performance criteria among medical devices.

Objectives: Objective performance criteria (OPC) may serve as a tool to expedite the approval process and continue active surveillance of class III medical devices. Thus far, published guidance on the creation of OPC has been clinical area-specific. This study aimed to capture reflections from key stakeholders on the creation of OPC that may serve as a precursor for a formalized conceptual framework within the USA.

Design: Reflections from key stakeholders and guidance from an advisory committee were captured to gain an understanding of the elements that are crucial to the generation of OPC.

Setting: A non-probability sampling method using the purposive sampling strategy was employed to identify relevant stakeholders for engagement in semi-structured, open-ended, concept elicitation discussions.

Participants: Stakeholders involved in the generation of OPC.

Main outcome measures: Elements and themes regarding the priorities of, experiences with, roles within and perceived challenges associated with OPC creation captured through a phenomenological approach.

Results: A total of 27 participants were engaged to represent the following contributors: representatives of registries, health systems, health technology assessment bodies, clinicians, device application reviewers, payers, patients, patient representatives, patient caregivers, device manufacturers, data coordinators, data analysts and data informaticians. Consensus was achieved on the five core elements: (1) identification of medical devices, (2) engagement of key stakeholders, (3) selection of data source, (4) performance of appropriate statistical analyses and (5) reporting of findings. The engagement of key stakeholders (38%) was cited most frequently as the most important core element. Access to meaningful and high-quality data sources (47%) was the most frequently mentioned challenge.

Conclusions: The reflections from the participants identified five elements to be considered when generating an OPC within class III medical devices and may provide the needed foundation for the development of official guidance on OPC generation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信