在加拿大社区卫生中心接受非癌性脊柱疼痛阿片类药物处方与脊椎按摩护理的关联:一项混合方法分析

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Peter C. Emary DC, MSc , Amy L. Brown DC , Mark Oremus MSc, PhD , Lawrence Mbuagbaw MD, MPH, PhD , Douglas F. Cameron DC , Jenna DiDonato HBSc(Kin) , Jason W. Busse DC, MSc, PhD
{"title":"在加拿大社区卫生中心接受非癌性脊柱疼痛阿片类药物处方与脊椎按摩护理的关联:一项混合方法分析","authors":"Peter C. Emary DC, MSc ,&nbsp;Amy L. Brown DC ,&nbsp;Mark Oremus MSc, PhD ,&nbsp;Lawrence Mbuagbaw MD, MPH, PhD ,&nbsp;Douglas F. Cameron DC ,&nbsp;Jenna DiDonato HBSc(Kin) ,&nbsp;Jason W. Busse DC, MSc, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jmpt.2022.06.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to examine the association between receipt of chiropractic services and initiating a prescription for opioids among adult patients with noncancer spinal pain in a Canadian community health center.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this sequential explanatory mixed methods analysis, we conducted a retrospective study of 945 patient records (January 2014 to December 2020) and completed interviews with 14 patients and 9 general practitioners. We used Cox proportional hazards regression analyses, adjusted for patient demographics, comorbidities, visit frequency, and calendar year to evaluate the association between receipt of chiropractic care and time to first opioid prescription up to 1 year after presentation. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically and integrated with our quantitative findings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 24% of patients (227 of 945) with noncancer spinal pain who received a prescription for opioids. The risk of initiating a prescription for opioids at 1 year after presentation was 52% lower in chiropractic recipients vs nonrecipients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48; 99% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-0.77) and 71% lower in patients who received chiropractic services within 30 days of their index visit (HR, 0.29; 99% CI, 0.13-0.68). Patients whose index visit date was in a more recent calendar year were also less likely to receive opioids (HR, 0.86; 99% CI, 0.76-0.97). Interviews suggested that self-efficacy, access to chiropractic services, opioid stigma, and treatment impact were influencing factors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients with noncancer spinal pain who received chiropractic care were less likely to obtain a prescription for opioids than patients who did not receive chiropractic care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475422000860/pdfft?md5=b4da22a85eeffd4d1d0511ec633bafff&pid=1-s2.0-S0161475422000860-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Chiropractic Care With Receiving an Opioid Prescription for Noncancer Spinal Pain Within a Canadian Community Health Center: A Mixed Methods Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Peter C. Emary DC, MSc ,&nbsp;Amy L. Brown DC ,&nbsp;Mark Oremus MSc, PhD ,&nbsp;Lawrence Mbuagbaw MD, MPH, PhD ,&nbsp;Douglas F. Cameron DC ,&nbsp;Jenna DiDonato HBSc(Kin) ,&nbsp;Jason W. Busse DC, MSc, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmpt.2022.06.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to examine the association between receipt of chiropractic services and initiating a prescription for opioids among adult patients with noncancer spinal pain in a Canadian community health center.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this sequential explanatory mixed methods analysis, we conducted a retrospective study of 945 patient records (January 2014 to December 2020) and completed interviews with 14 patients and 9 general practitioners. We used Cox proportional hazards regression analyses, adjusted for patient demographics, comorbidities, visit frequency, and calendar year to evaluate the association between receipt of chiropractic care and time to first opioid prescription up to 1 year after presentation. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically and integrated with our quantitative findings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 24% of patients (227 of 945) with noncancer spinal pain who received a prescription for opioids. The risk of initiating a prescription for opioids at 1 year after presentation was 52% lower in chiropractic recipients vs nonrecipients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48; 99% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-0.77) and 71% lower in patients who received chiropractic services within 30 days of their index visit (HR, 0.29; 99% CI, 0.13-0.68). Patients whose index visit date was in a more recent calendar year were also less likely to receive opioids (HR, 0.86; 99% CI, 0.76-0.97). Interviews suggested that self-efficacy, access to chiropractic services, opioid stigma, and treatment impact were influencing factors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients with noncancer spinal pain who received chiropractic care were less likely to obtain a prescription for opioids than patients who did not receive chiropractic care.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475422000860/pdfft?md5=b4da22a85eeffd4d1d0511ec633bafff&pid=1-s2.0-S0161475422000860-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475422000860\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475422000860","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是研究加拿大社区卫生中心非癌性脊柱疼痛的成人患者接受脊椎指压治疗和开始开具阿片类药物处方之间的关系。方法采用序贯解释混合方法分析,对2014年1月至2020年12月945例患者病历进行回顾性研究,并对14例患者和9名全科医生进行访谈。我们使用Cox比例风险回归分析,调整患者人口统计学、合并症、就诊频率和日历年,以评估接受脊椎按摩治疗与就诊后1年内首次开具阿片类药物处方的时间之间的关系。定性数据按主题进行分析,并与定量结果相结合。结果945例非癌性脊柱疼痛患者中有227例(24%)接受了阿片类药物处方。在就诊后1年开始开具阿片类药物处方的风险在整脊疗法患者中比未接受治疗的患者低52%(风险比[HR], 0.48;99%可信区间[CI], 0.29-0.77),在指标就诊后30天内接受捏脊治疗的患者的死亡率降低71% (HR, 0.29;99% ci, 0.13-0.68)。索引就诊日期在最近日历年的患者接受阿片类药物的可能性也较低(HR, 0.86;99% ci, 0.76-0.97)。访谈表明,自我效能感、获得脊椎按摩服务、阿片类药物耻辱感和治疗效果是影响因素。结论接受捏脊治疗的非癌性脊柱疼痛患者获得阿片类药物处方的可能性低于未接受捏脊治疗的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of Chiropractic Care With Receiving an Opioid Prescription for Noncancer Spinal Pain Within a Canadian Community Health Center: A Mixed Methods Analysis

Objective

The purpose of this study was to examine the association between receipt of chiropractic services and initiating a prescription for opioids among adult patients with noncancer spinal pain in a Canadian community health center.

Methods

In this sequential explanatory mixed methods analysis, we conducted a retrospective study of 945 patient records (January 2014 to December 2020) and completed interviews with 14 patients and 9 general practitioners. We used Cox proportional hazards regression analyses, adjusted for patient demographics, comorbidities, visit frequency, and calendar year to evaluate the association between receipt of chiropractic care and time to first opioid prescription up to 1 year after presentation. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically and integrated with our quantitative findings.

Results

There were 24% of patients (227 of 945) with noncancer spinal pain who received a prescription for opioids. The risk of initiating a prescription for opioids at 1 year after presentation was 52% lower in chiropractic recipients vs nonrecipients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48; 99% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-0.77) and 71% lower in patients who received chiropractic services within 30 days of their index visit (HR, 0.29; 99% CI, 0.13-0.68). Patients whose index visit date was in a more recent calendar year were also less likely to receive opioids (HR, 0.86; 99% CI, 0.76-0.97). Interviews suggested that self-efficacy, access to chiropractic services, opioid stigma, and treatment impact were influencing factors.

Conclusion

Patients with noncancer spinal pain who received chiropractic care were less likely to obtain a prescription for opioids than patients who did not receive chiropractic care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
63
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (JMPT) is an international and interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the advancement of conservative health care principles and practices. The JMPT is the premier biomedical publication in the chiropractic profession and publishes peer reviewed, research articles and the Journal''s editorial board includes leading researchers from around the world. The Journal publishes original primary research and review articles of the highest quality in relevant topic areas. The JMPT addresses practitioners and researchers needs by adding to their clinical and basic science knowledge and by informing them about relevant issues that influence health care practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信