阻力训练系统中的肌肉适应和心理生理反应。

IF 1.4 4区 教育学 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Alysson Enes, Danilo Fonseca Leonel, Gustavo Oneda, Ragami C Alves, Bruna A Zandoná-Schmidt, Luís Henrique Boiko Ferreira, Jonato Prestes, Steven R McAnulty, Tácito P Souza-Junior
{"title":"阻力训练系统中的肌肉适应和心理生理反应。","authors":"Alysson Enes, Danilo Fonseca Leonel, Gustavo Oneda, Ragami C Alves, Bruna A Zandoná-Schmidt, Luís Henrique Boiko Ferreira, Jonato Prestes, Steven R McAnulty, Tácito P Souza-Junior","doi":"10.1080/02701367.2022.2096843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>: We investigated the effect of drop-set (DS) and rest-pause (RP) systems compared to traditional (TRAD) resistance training on muscular adaptations and psychophysiological responses. <b>Methods</b>: Twenty-seven trained men (age: 23.4 ± 3.4 years; resistance training experience: 5.1 ± 1.7 years) were assigned to experimental groups (DS: n = 9, 3 × 10 repetitions at 75% with 6 additional repetitions at 55% 1RM; RP: n = 9, 3 × 16 repetitions at 75% 1RM; TRAD: n = 9, 4 × 12 repetitions at 70% 1RM) and performed lower-limb training sessions twice a week for 8 weeks. Maximum dynamic strength (1RM) and localized muscular endurance (LME) tests were performed in 45° leg press at baseline and post intervention. Session-RPE was assessed 15 min after the end of each training session. <b>Results</b>: A significant time vs. group interaction was observed for 1RM (<i>p</i> = .012) and LME (<i>p</i> < .0001). Post hoc comparisons revealed that RP elicited greater gains in muscular strength than DS (<i>p</i> = .044) but not TRAD (<i>p</i> = .116); and DS elicited greater LME than RP (<i>p</i> < .001) and TRAD (<i>p</i> = .001). No statistical differences were observed in Session-RPE and training strain between conditions; however, RP promoted higher training monotony (<i>p</i> = .036) than DS and TRAD. <b>Conclusions</b>: The DS and RP systems have a potential role in training programs aiming to promote muscle strength and localized muscular endurance adaptations, respectively. However, RP may promote higher training monotony than DS and TRAD, even though the other psychophysiological responses are similar.</p>","PeriodicalId":54491,"journal":{"name":"Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Muscular Adaptations and Psychophysiological Responses in Resistance Training Systems.\",\"authors\":\"Alysson Enes, Danilo Fonseca Leonel, Gustavo Oneda, Ragami C Alves, Bruna A Zandoná-Schmidt, Luís Henrique Boiko Ferreira, Jonato Prestes, Steven R McAnulty, Tácito P Souza-Junior\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02701367.2022.2096843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>: We investigated the effect of drop-set (DS) and rest-pause (RP) systems compared to traditional (TRAD) resistance training on muscular adaptations and psychophysiological responses. <b>Methods</b>: Twenty-seven trained men (age: 23.4 ± 3.4 years; resistance training experience: 5.1 ± 1.7 years) were assigned to experimental groups (DS: n = 9, 3 × 10 repetitions at 75% with 6 additional repetitions at 55% 1RM; RP: n = 9, 3 × 16 repetitions at 75% 1RM; TRAD: n = 9, 4 × 12 repetitions at 70% 1RM) and performed lower-limb training sessions twice a week for 8 weeks. Maximum dynamic strength (1RM) and localized muscular endurance (LME) tests were performed in 45° leg press at baseline and post intervention. Session-RPE was assessed 15 min after the end of each training session. <b>Results</b>: A significant time vs. group interaction was observed for 1RM (<i>p</i> = .012) and LME (<i>p</i> < .0001). Post hoc comparisons revealed that RP elicited greater gains in muscular strength than DS (<i>p</i> = .044) but not TRAD (<i>p</i> = .116); and DS elicited greater LME than RP (<i>p</i> < .001) and TRAD (<i>p</i> = .001). No statistical differences were observed in Session-RPE and training strain between conditions; however, RP promoted higher training monotony (<i>p</i> = .036) than DS and TRAD. <b>Conclusions</b>: The DS and RP systems have a potential role in training programs aiming to promote muscle strength and localized muscular endurance adaptations, respectively. However, RP may promote higher training monotony than DS and TRAD, even though the other psychophysiological responses are similar.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2022.2096843\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2022.2096843","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:我们研究了drop-set (DS)和rest-pause (RP)系统与传统(TRAD)阻力训练相比对肌肉适应和心理生理反应的影响。方法:男性27例,年龄23.4±3.4岁;阻力训练经验:5.1±1.7年)被分配到实验组(DS: n = 9, 3 × 10次,75%,外加6次,55% 1RM;RP: n = 9,3 × 16次,75% 1RM;TRAD: n = 9, 4 × 12次重复,70% 1RM),每周进行两次下肢训练,持续8周。在基线和干预后进行45°腿压的最大动态强度(1RM)和局部肌肉耐力(LME)测试。每次训练结束后15分钟评估rpe。结果:观察到1RM (p = 0.012)和LME (p < 0.0001)的显著时间与组间相互作用。事后比较显示,RP组肌肉力量的增加大于DS组(p = 0.044),而非TRAD组(p = 0.116);DS诱导的LME高于RP (p < 0.001)和TRAD (p = 0.001)。两组间的会话rpe和训练应变无统计学差异;然而,RP比DS和TRAD提高了训练单调性(p = 0.036)。结论:DS和RP系统分别在旨在促进肌肉力量和局部肌肉耐力适应的训练计划中具有潜在的作用。然而,尽管其他心理生理反应相似,RP可能比DS和TRAD促进更高的训练单调性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Muscular Adaptations and Psychophysiological Responses in Resistance Training Systems.

Purpose: We investigated the effect of drop-set (DS) and rest-pause (RP) systems compared to traditional (TRAD) resistance training on muscular adaptations and psychophysiological responses. Methods: Twenty-seven trained men (age: 23.4 ± 3.4 years; resistance training experience: 5.1 ± 1.7 years) were assigned to experimental groups (DS: n = 9, 3 × 10 repetitions at 75% with 6 additional repetitions at 55% 1RM; RP: n = 9, 3 × 16 repetitions at 75% 1RM; TRAD: n = 9, 4 × 12 repetitions at 70% 1RM) and performed lower-limb training sessions twice a week for 8 weeks. Maximum dynamic strength (1RM) and localized muscular endurance (LME) tests were performed in 45° leg press at baseline and post intervention. Session-RPE was assessed 15 min after the end of each training session. Results: A significant time vs. group interaction was observed for 1RM (p = .012) and LME (p < .0001). Post hoc comparisons revealed that RP elicited greater gains in muscular strength than DS (p = .044) but not TRAD (p = .116); and DS elicited greater LME than RP (p < .001) and TRAD (p = .001). No statistical differences were observed in Session-RPE and training strain between conditions; however, RP promoted higher training monotony (p = .036) than DS and TRAD. Conclusions: The DS and RP systems have a potential role in training programs aiming to promote muscle strength and localized muscular endurance adaptations, respectively. However, RP may promote higher training monotony than DS and TRAD, even though the other psychophysiological responses are similar.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport publishes research in the art and science of human movement that contributes significantly to the knowledge base of the field as new information, reviews, substantiation or contradiction of previous findings, development of theory, or as application of new or improved techniques. The goals of RQES are to provide a scholarly outlet for knowledge that: (a) contributes to the study of human movement, particularly its cross-disciplinary and interdisciplinary nature; (b) impacts theory and practice regarding human movement; (c) stimulates research about human movement; and (d) provides theoretical reviews and tutorials related to the study of human movement. The editorial board, associate editors, and external reviewers assist the editor-in-chief. Qualified reviewers in the appropriate subdisciplines review manuscripts deemed suitable. Authors are usually advised of the decision on their papers within 75–90 days.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信