视网膜前膜手术中内限制膜剥离与非剥离后光学相干断层血管造影参数的变化。

Maximilian Gabriel, Daniel Djavid, Felix Innauer, Domagoj Ivastinovic, Gerald Seidel, Christoph Mayer-Xanthaki, Siamak Ansari-Shahrezaei, Andreas Wedrich, Anton Haas
{"title":"视网膜前膜手术中内限制膜剥离与非剥离后光学相干断层血管造影参数的变化。","authors":"Maximilian Gabriel,&nbsp;Daniel Djavid,&nbsp;Felix Innauer,&nbsp;Domagoj Ivastinovic,&nbsp;Gerald Seidel,&nbsp;Christoph Mayer-Xanthaki,&nbsp;Siamak Ansari-Shahrezaei,&nbsp;Andreas Wedrich,&nbsp;Anton Haas","doi":"10.1097/IAE.0000000000003567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To prospectively compare microvascular changes of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeled and nonpeeled eyes in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membranes using optical coherence tomography angiography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two patients with epiretinal membranes underwent vitrectomy with (n = 22) or without ILM peeling (n = 20). The mean superficial capillary plexus foveal avascular zone area change between preoperative and three-month postoperative readings served as the main outcome measure. Secondary outcome parameters included mean changes in superficial capillary plexus parafoveal vessel density, central foveal thickness, retinal volume, and best-corrected visual acuity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean superficial capillary plexus foveal avascular zone area change (μm 2 ) was 59 ± 74 in the ILM nonpeeling group compared with -12 ± 86 in the ILM peeling group ( P = 0.007). Similarly, mean superficial capillary plexus parafoveal vessel density change (%) was higher in the ILM nonpeeling group (ILM nonpeeling 4 ± 4, ILM peeling -2 ± 6, P = 0.003). The mean retinal volume reduction was higher in the ILM peeling group, and this difference also reached statistical significance ( P = 0.036). There were no intergroup differences in mean central foveal thickness change and mean best-corrected visual acuity change ( P = 0.409 and P = 0.440, respectively). Epiretinal membrane/ILM separation was achieved in 23 of 51 patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The macular microvasculature demonstrated more remodeling in the ILM nonpeeling group after three months.</p>","PeriodicalId":377573,"journal":{"name":"Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":"1867-1873"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CHANGES OF OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY PARAMETERS AFTER INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING COMPARED WITH NONPEELING IN EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE SURGERY.\",\"authors\":\"Maximilian Gabriel,&nbsp;Daniel Djavid,&nbsp;Felix Innauer,&nbsp;Domagoj Ivastinovic,&nbsp;Gerald Seidel,&nbsp;Christoph Mayer-Xanthaki,&nbsp;Siamak Ansari-Shahrezaei,&nbsp;Andreas Wedrich,&nbsp;Anton Haas\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/IAE.0000000000003567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To prospectively compare microvascular changes of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeled and nonpeeled eyes in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membranes using optical coherence tomography angiography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two patients with epiretinal membranes underwent vitrectomy with (n = 22) or without ILM peeling (n = 20). The mean superficial capillary plexus foveal avascular zone area change between preoperative and three-month postoperative readings served as the main outcome measure. Secondary outcome parameters included mean changes in superficial capillary plexus parafoveal vessel density, central foveal thickness, retinal volume, and best-corrected visual acuity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean superficial capillary plexus foveal avascular zone area change (μm 2 ) was 59 ± 74 in the ILM nonpeeling group compared with -12 ± 86 in the ILM peeling group ( P = 0.007). Similarly, mean superficial capillary plexus parafoveal vessel density change (%) was higher in the ILM nonpeeling group (ILM nonpeeling 4 ± 4, ILM peeling -2 ± 6, P = 0.003). The mean retinal volume reduction was higher in the ILM peeling group, and this difference also reached statistical significance ( P = 0.036). There were no intergroup differences in mean central foveal thickness change and mean best-corrected visual acuity change ( P = 0.409 and P = 0.440, respectively). Epiretinal membrane/ILM separation was achieved in 23 of 51 patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The macular microvasculature demonstrated more remodeling in the ILM nonpeeling group after three months.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":377573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1867-1873\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000003567\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000003567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:应用光学相干断层血管造影前瞻性比较特发性视网膜前膜患者去皮和未去皮的微血管变化。方法:42例视网膜前膜患者行玻璃体切除术(22例)和非玻璃体剥离(20例)。术前和术后三个月的平均毛细血管浅丛无血管区面积变化读数是主要的结局指标。次要结局参数包括浅表毛细血管丛中央凹旁血管密度、中央凹厚度、视网膜体积和最佳矫正视力的平均变化。结果:ILM非剥离组毛细血管浅丛中央凹无血管区面积(μ 2)平均值为59±74,ILM剥离组为-12±86 (P = 0.007)。同样,ILM未剥离组的平均浅毛细血管丛中央凹旁血管密度变化(%)更高(ILM未剥离组为4±4,ILM剥离组为-2±6,P = 0.003)。ILM剥落组平均视网膜体积缩小率更高,差异也有统计学意义(P = 0.036)。平均中央凹厚度变化和平均最佳矫正视力变化组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.409, P = 0.440)。51例患者中有23例实现了视网膜外膜/ILM分离。结论:ILM未剥落组在3个月后黄斑微血管重构明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CHANGES OF OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY PARAMETERS AFTER INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING COMPARED WITH NONPEELING IN EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE SURGERY.

Purpose: To prospectively compare microvascular changes of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeled and nonpeeled eyes in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membranes using optical coherence tomography angiography.

Methods: Forty-two patients with epiretinal membranes underwent vitrectomy with (n = 22) or without ILM peeling (n = 20). The mean superficial capillary plexus foveal avascular zone area change between preoperative and three-month postoperative readings served as the main outcome measure. Secondary outcome parameters included mean changes in superficial capillary plexus parafoveal vessel density, central foveal thickness, retinal volume, and best-corrected visual acuity.

Results: Mean superficial capillary plexus foveal avascular zone area change (μm 2 ) was 59 ± 74 in the ILM nonpeeling group compared with -12 ± 86 in the ILM peeling group ( P = 0.007). Similarly, mean superficial capillary plexus parafoveal vessel density change (%) was higher in the ILM nonpeeling group (ILM nonpeeling 4 ± 4, ILM peeling -2 ± 6, P = 0.003). The mean retinal volume reduction was higher in the ILM peeling group, and this difference also reached statistical significance ( P = 0.036). There were no intergroup differences in mean central foveal thickness change and mean best-corrected visual acuity change ( P = 0.409 and P = 0.440, respectively). Epiretinal membrane/ILM separation was achieved in 23 of 51 patients.

Conclusion: The macular microvasculature demonstrated more remodeling in the ILM nonpeeling group after three months.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信