内收管阻滞在膝关节置换术后控制疼痛的门诊:一项随机对照临床试验。

IF 1.6
Sholahuddin Rhatomy, Faiz A Rasyid, Michael A Romulo, Imelda Lumban-Gaol, Nicolaas C Budhiparama
{"title":"内收管阻滞在膝关节置换术后控制疼痛的门诊:一项随机对照临床试验。","authors":"Sholahuddin Rhatomy,&nbsp;Faiz A Rasyid,&nbsp;Michael A Romulo,&nbsp;Imelda Lumban-Gaol,&nbsp;Nicolaas C Budhiparama","doi":"10.1177/10225536221122246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Successful total knee replacement surgery is influenced by surgery and rehabilitation program. We hypothesized the adductor canal block (ACB) in the outpatient clinic is safe, effective for pain relief and decreases analgesic consumption compared with controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>a paired, randomized controlled trial. The intervention group received ACB with 15 mL mixture of ropivacaine 0.2% with isotonic saline and steroids on post-operative day 14 (POD-14) at the outpatient clinic, the control group received daily consumption of analgesic. We evaluated Visual Analog Score (VAS) pain score, and analgesic consumption.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>35 subjects for each group. In the ACB group, mean of age was 66.42 years old, mean of BMI was 25.87. The control group, mean of age was 64.11 years old, mean of BMI was 25.95. There were significantly different mean VAS scores of both groups and analgesic consumption of both groups on POD 15<sup>th</sup>, 17<sup>th</sup> and 19<sup>th</sup> (<i>p</i> = 0.00, 0.000 and 0.001, respectively). Two patients complained about hematoma in their thigh (insertion needle) and recovered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Single-shot ACB in the outpatient clinic is safe, significantly decreased pain and analgesic consumption and may enhance the rehabilitation program.</p>","PeriodicalId":520682,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)","volume":" ","pages":"10225536221122246"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adductor canal block in outpatient clinic for pain control after knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled, clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sholahuddin Rhatomy,&nbsp;Faiz A Rasyid,&nbsp;Michael A Romulo,&nbsp;Imelda Lumban-Gaol,&nbsp;Nicolaas C Budhiparama\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10225536221122246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Successful total knee replacement surgery is influenced by surgery and rehabilitation program. We hypothesized the adductor canal block (ACB) in the outpatient clinic is safe, effective for pain relief and decreases analgesic consumption compared with controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>a paired, randomized controlled trial. The intervention group received ACB with 15 mL mixture of ropivacaine 0.2% with isotonic saline and steroids on post-operative day 14 (POD-14) at the outpatient clinic, the control group received daily consumption of analgesic. We evaluated Visual Analog Score (VAS) pain score, and analgesic consumption.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>35 subjects for each group. In the ACB group, mean of age was 66.42 years old, mean of BMI was 25.87. The control group, mean of age was 64.11 years old, mean of BMI was 25.95. There were significantly different mean VAS scores of both groups and analgesic consumption of both groups on POD 15<sup>th</sup>, 17<sup>th</sup> and 19<sup>th</sup> (<i>p</i> = 0.00, 0.000 and 0.001, respectively). Two patients complained about hematoma in their thigh (insertion needle) and recovered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Single-shot ACB in the outpatient clinic is safe, significantly decreased pain and analgesic consumption and may enhance the rehabilitation program.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10225536221122246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536221122246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536221122246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:全膝关节置换术成功与否受手术和康复计划的影响。我们假设门诊的内收管阻滞(ACB)与对照组相比是安全、有效的疼痛缓解和减少镇痛消耗。方法:配对、随机对照试验。干预组于术后第14天(POD-14)在门诊接受15 mL罗哌卡因0.2%与等渗盐水和类固醇混合的ACB治疗,对照组每日服用镇痛药。我们评估视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分和镇痛药消耗。结果:每组35例。ACB组患者平均年龄66.42岁,BMI平均值25.87。对照组平均年龄64.11岁,BMI平均值25.95。两组患者在第15、17、19天的VAS平均评分及镇痛用量差异均有统计学意义(p分别为0.00、0.000、0.001)。2例患者主诉大腿(插针处)血肿并痊愈。结论:门诊单针ACB是安全的,可显著减少疼痛和镇痛消耗,并可促进康复计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adductor canal block in outpatient clinic for pain control after knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled, clinical trial.

Background: Successful total knee replacement surgery is influenced by surgery and rehabilitation program. We hypothesized the adductor canal block (ACB) in the outpatient clinic is safe, effective for pain relief and decreases analgesic consumption compared with controls.

Methods: a paired, randomized controlled trial. The intervention group received ACB with 15 mL mixture of ropivacaine 0.2% with isotonic saline and steroids on post-operative day 14 (POD-14) at the outpatient clinic, the control group received daily consumption of analgesic. We evaluated Visual Analog Score (VAS) pain score, and analgesic consumption.

Results: 35 subjects for each group. In the ACB group, mean of age was 66.42 years old, mean of BMI was 25.87. The control group, mean of age was 64.11 years old, mean of BMI was 25.95. There were significantly different mean VAS scores of both groups and analgesic consumption of both groups on POD 15th, 17th and 19th (p = 0.00, 0.000 and 0.001, respectively). Two patients complained about hematoma in their thigh (insertion needle) and recovered.

Conclusions: Single-shot ACB in the outpatient clinic is safe, significantly decreased pain and analgesic consumption and may enhance the rehabilitation program.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信