Chuan Ling Tang, Qi Yue Li, Feng Lian Chen, Chen Ting Cai, Yue Yan Dong, Yuan Yuan Wu, Jian Zhi Yang, Mei Zhao, Feng Li Chi, Ling Hong, Ai Ai, Miao Xin Chen, Kun Ming Li, Xiao Ming Teng, Zhi Qin Chen
{"title":"阿托西班在接受IVF治疗的复发性着床失败患者中的随机双盲比较。","authors":"Chuan Ling Tang, Qi Yue Li, Feng Lian Chen, Chen Ting Cai, Yue Yan Dong, Yuan Yuan Wu, Jian Zhi Yang, Mei Zhao, Feng Li Chi, Ling Hong, Ai Ai, Miao Xin Chen, Kun Ming Li, Xiao Ming Teng, Zhi Qin Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12958-022-00999-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) may have more uterine contractions. Several observational studies suggested that atosiban administration around embryo transfer resulted in higher pregnancy rates in RIF patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of atosiban given before fresh embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes of women with RIF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial was performed in IVF center of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital. According to a computer-generated randomization list, 194 infertile women with RIF received fresh embryo transfer between July 2017 and December 2019 were randomly allocated into the atosiban (n = 97) and the placebo (n = 97) groups. Women in the treatment group received atosiban intravenously about 30 min before embryo transfer with a bolus dose of 6.75 mg over one minute. Those in the placebo group received only normal saline infusion for the same duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in the live birth rate between the atosiban and placebo groups (42.3% vs 35.1%, P = 0.302, RR = 1.206 (0.844-1.723)). No significant differences were found between the two groups in the positive pregnancy test, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, miscarriage, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy and implantation rates. Similar results were found when stratified by the number of embryos previously transferred, number of previous failed embryo transfers, frequency of endometrial peristalsis on embryo transfer day (≥ 3 waves/min) or serum estradiol (E<sub>2</sub>) on the day of hCG above the median level. And, there was no correlation between the serum E<sub>2</sub> level on the day of hCG and the frequency of endometrial peristalsis on embryo transfer day. The frequency of endometrial peristalsis on embryo transfer day, total FSH/HMG dosage and duration were the significant factors which independently predicted the likelihood of a live birth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggested that atosiban treatment before fresh embryo transfer might not improve the live birth rate in RIF patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study had been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the hospital (2017 ethics No.43) and was registered under Clinicaltrials.gov with an identifier NCT02893722.</p>","PeriodicalId":520764,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E","volume":" ","pages":"124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9389813/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A randomized double blind comparison of atosiban in patients with recurrent implantation failure undergoing IVF treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Chuan Ling Tang, Qi Yue Li, Feng Lian Chen, Chen Ting Cai, Yue Yan Dong, Yuan Yuan Wu, Jian Zhi Yang, Mei Zhao, Feng Li Chi, Ling Hong, Ai Ai, Miao Xin Chen, Kun Ming Li, Xiao Ming Teng, Zhi Qin Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12958-022-00999-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) may have more uterine contractions. Several observational studies suggested that atosiban administration around embryo transfer resulted in higher pregnancy rates in RIF patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of atosiban given before fresh embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes of women with RIF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial was performed in IVF center of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital. According to a computer-generated randomization list, 194 infertile women with RIF received fresh embryo transfer between July 2017 and December 2019 were randomly allocated into the atosiban (n = 97) and the placebo (n = 97) groups. Women in the treatment group received atosiban intravenously about 30 min before embryo transfer with a bolus dose of 6.75 mg over one minute. Those in the placebo group received only normal saline infusion for the same duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in the live birth rate between the atosiban and placebo groups (42.3% vs 35.1%, P = 0.302, RR = 1.206 (0.844-1.723)). No significant differences were found between the two groups in the positive pregnancy test, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, miscarriage, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy and implantation rates. Similar results were found when stratified by the number of embryos previously transferred, number of previous failed embryo transfers, frequency of endometrial peristalsis on embryo transfer day (≥ 3 waves/min) or serum estradiol (E<sub>2</sub>) on the day of hCG above the median level. And, there was no correlation between the serum E<sub>2</sub> level on the day of hCG and the frequency of endometrial peristalsis on embryo transfer day. The frequency of endometrial peristalsis on embryo transfer day, total FSH/HMG dosage and duration were the significant factors which independently predicted the likelihood of a live birth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggested that atosiban treatment before fresh embryo transfer might not improve the live birth rate in RIF patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study had been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the hospital (2017 ethics No.43) and was registered under Clinicaltrials.gov with an identifier NCT02893722.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9389813/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-00999-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-00999-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
背景:复发性植入失败(RIF)患者可能有更多的子宫收缩。几项观察性研究表明,胚胎移植前后给予阿托西班可提高RIF患者的妊娠率。本研究旨在评估新鲜胚胎移植前给予阿托西班对RIF妇女妊娠结局的影响。方法:在上海市第一母婴医院体外受精中心进行前瞻性、随机、双盲对照临床试验。根据计算机生成的随机列表,在2017年7月至2019年12月期间接受新鲜胚胎移植的194名患有RIF的不孕妇女被随机分配到阿托西班组(n = 97)和安慰剂组(n = 97)。治疗组妇女在胚胎移植前约30分钟静脉注射阿托西班,一分钟内注射6.75 mg。安慰剂组在相同的时间内只接受生理盐水输注。结果:阿托西班组与安慰剂组的活产率差异无统计学意义(42.3% vs 35.1%, P = 0.302, RR = 1.206(0.844-1.723))。两组妊娠试验阳性、临床妊娠、持续妊娠、流产、多胎、异位妊娠、着床率均无显著差异。按先前移植的胚胎数量、先前失败的胚胎移植次数、胚胎移植当天子宫内膜运动频率(≥3波/分钟)或hCG高于中位水平当天血清雌二醇(E2)进行分层,也发现了类似的结果。hCG检测当天血清E2水平与胚胎移植当天子宫内膜蠕动次数无相关性。胚胎移植当天子宫内膜蠕动频率、FSH/HMG总剂量和持续时间是独立预测活产可能性的重要因素。结论:这些结果表明,新鲜胚胎移植前阿托西班治疗可能不会提高RIF患者的活产率。试验注册:该研究已获得医院机构审查委员会批准(2017伦理第43号),并在Clinicaltrials.gov上注册,标识符为NCT02893722。
A randomized double blind comparison of atosiban in patients with recurrent implantation failure undergoing IVF treatment.
Background: Patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) may have more uterine contractions. Several observational studies suggested that atosiban administration around embryo transfer resulted in higher pregnancy rates in RIF patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of atosiban given before fresh embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes of women with RIF.
Methods: A prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial was performed in IVF center of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital. According to a computer-generated randomization list, 194 infertile women with RIF received fresh embryo transfer between July 2017 and December 2019 were randomly allocated into the atosiban (n = 97) and the placebo (n = 97) groups. Women in the treatment group received atosiban intravenously about 30 min before embryo transfer with a bolus dose of 6.75 mg over one minute. Those in the placebo group received only normal saline infusion for the same duration.
Results: There was no significant difference in the live birth rate between the atosiban and placebo groups (42.3% vs 35.1%, P = 0.302, RR = 1.206 (0.844-1.723)). No significant differences were found between the two groups in the positive pregnancy test, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, miscarriage, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy and implantation rates. Similar results were found when stratified by the number of embryos previously transferred, number of previous failed embryo transfers, frequency of endometrial peristalsis on embryo transfer day (≥ 3 waves/min) or serum estradiol (E2) on the day of hCG above the median level. And, there was no correlation between the serum E2 level on the day of hCG and the frequency of endometrial peristalsis on embryo transfer day. The frequency of endometrial peristalsis on embryo transfer day, total FSH/HMG dosage and duration were the significant factors which independently predicted the likelihood of a live birth.
Conclusions: These results suggested that atosiban treatment before fresh embryo transfer might not improve the live birth rate in RIF patients.
Trial registration: The study had been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the hospital (2017 ethics No.43) and was registered under Clinicaltrials.gov with an identifier NCT02893722.