Georgios Mylonas, Bilal Haj Najeeb, Felix Goldbach, Gabor G Deak, Martin Michl, Jonas Brugger, Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth, Bianca S Gerendas
{"title":"玻璃体黄斑界面对三种不同抗vegf药物治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的功能和解剖结果的影响:方案T研究的事后分析。","authors":"Georgios Mylonas, Bilal Haj Najeeb, Felix Goldbach, Gabor G Deak, Martin Michl, Jonas Brugger, Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth, Bianca S Gerendas","doi":"10.1097/IAE.0000000000003594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the impact of baseline vitreomacular interface status on treatment outcomes in patients treated with three different anti-vascular endothelial growth factors for diabetic macular edema.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Post hoc analysis from patients enrolled in the DRCR.net Protocol T study. Optical coherence tomography images were analyzed at baseline and at the end of follow-up to identify the presence of complete vitreomacular adhesion, partial vitreomacular adhesion, vitreomacular traction syndrome, and complete posterior vitreous detachment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six hundred and twenty-nine eyes were eligible for the study based on the study criteria. Complete adhesion eyes gained on average +3.7 more ETDRS letters compared with the complete posterior vitreous detachment group at the end of the 12 months follow-up ( P < 0.001). Baseline vitreomacular interface status had no significant influence on central subfield thickness at 12 months ( P = 0.144). There was no difference between the treatment arms based on effect of baseline vitreomacular interface status on best-corrected visual acuity gain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides evidence that vitreomacular interface status affects functional outcomes in diabetic macular edema patients treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections. The presence of complete or partial vitreomacular adhesion at baseline may be associated with a larger treatment benefit than those with complete posterior vitreous detachment.</p>","PeriodicalId":377573,"journal":{"name":"Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":"2066-2074"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE IMPACT OF THE VITREOMACULAR INTERFACE ON FUNCTIONAL AND ANATOMICAL OUTCOMES IN DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA TREATED WITH THREE DIFFERENT ANTI-VEGF AGENTS: Post Hoc Analysis of The Protocol T Study.\",\"authors\":\"Georgios Mylonas, Bilal Haj Najeeb, Felix Goldbach, Gabor G Deak, Martin Michl, Jonas Brugger, Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth, Bianca S Gerendas\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/IAE.0000000000003594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the impact of baseline vitreomacular interface status on treatment outcomes in patients treated with three different anti-vascular endothelial growth factors for diabetic macular edema.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Post hoc analysis from patients enrolled in the DRCR.net Protocol T study. Optical coherence tomography images were analyzed at baseline and at the end of follow-up to identify the presence of complete vitreomacular adhesion, partial vitreomacular adhesion, vitreomacular traction syndrome, and complete posterior vitreous detachment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six hundred and twenty-nine eyes were eligible for the study based on the study criteria. Complete adhesion eyes gained on average +3.7 more ETDRS letters compared with the complete posterior vitreous detachment group at the end of the 12 months follow-up ( P < 0.001). Baseline vitreomacular interface status had no significant influence on central subfield thickness at 12 months ( P = 0.144). There was no difference between the treatment arms based on effect of baseline vitreomacular interface status on best-corrected visual acuity gain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides evidence that vitreomacular interface status affects functional outcomes in diabetic macular edema patients treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections. The presence of complete or partial vitreomacular adhesion at baseline may be associated with a larger treatment benefit than those with complete posterior vitreous detachment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":377573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2066-2074\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000003594\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000003594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
THE IMPACT OF THE VITREOMACULAR INTERFACE ON FUNCTIONAL AND ANATOMICAL OUTCOMES IN DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA TREATED WITH THREE DIFFERENT ANTI-VEGF AGENTS: Post Hoc Analysis of The Protocol T Study.
Purpose: To investigate the impact of baseline vitreomacular interface status on treatment outcomes in patients treated with three different anti-vascular endothelial growth factors for diabetic macular edema.
Methods: Post hoc analysis from patients enrolled in the DRCR.net Protocol T study. Optical coherence tomography images were analyzed at baseline and at the end of follow-up to identify the presence of complete vitreomacular adhesion, partial vitreomacular adhesion, vitreomacular traction syndrome, and complete posterior vitreous detachment.
Results: Six hundred and twenty-nine eyes were eligible for the study based on the study criteria. Complete adhesion eyes gained on average +3.7 more ETDRS letters compared with the complete posterior vitreous detachment group at the end of the 12 months follow-up ( P < 0.001). Baseline vitreomacular interface status had no significant influence on central subfield thickness at 12 months ( P = 0.144). There was no difference between the treatment arms based on effect of baseline vitreomacular interface status on best-corrected visual acuity gain.
Conclusion: This study provides evidence that vitreomacular interface status affects functional outcomes in diabetic macular edema patients treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections. The presence of complete or partial vitreomacular adhesion at baseline may be associated with a larger treatment benefit than those with complete posterior vitreous detachment.