健康与医学中的用户体验:多学科合作中患者体验设计的构建方法。

Molly M Kessler, Lee-Ann K Breuch, Danielle M Stambler, Kari L Campeau, Olivia J Riggins, Erin Feddema, Sarah I Doornink, Stephanie Misono
{"title":"健康与医学中的用户体验:多学科合作中患者体验设计的构建方法。","authors":"Molly M Kessler,&nbsp;Lee-Ann K Breuch,&nbsp;Danielle M Stambler,&nbsp;Kari L Campeau,&nbsp;Olivia J Riggins,&nbsp;Erin Feddema,&nbsp;Sarah I Doornink,&nbsp;Stephanie Misono","doi":"10.1177/00472816211044498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health and medical contexts have emerged as an important area of inquiry for researchers at the intersection of user experience and technical communication. In addressing this intersection, this article advocates and extends patient experience design or PXD (Melonçon, 2017) as an important framework for user experience research within health and medicine. Specifically, this article presents several PXD insights from a task-based usability study that examined an online intervention program for people with voice problems. We respond to Melonçon's call (2017) to build PXD as a framework for user experience and technical communication research by describing ways traditional usability methods can provide PXD insights and asking the following question: <i>What insights can emerge from combining traditional usability methods and PXD research?</i> In addressing this question, we outline two primary methodological and practical considerations we found central to conducting PXD research: 1) engaging patients as participants, and 2) leveraging multidisciplinary collaboration.</p>","PeriodicalId":93788,"journal":{"name":"Journal of technical writing and communication","volume":"51 4","pages":"380-406"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9307135/pdf/nihms-1703342.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"User Experience in Health & Medicine: Building Methods for Patient Experience Design in Multidisciplinary Collaborations.\",\"authors\":\"Molly M Kessler,&nbsp;Lee-Ann K Breuch,&nbsp;Danielle M Stambler,&nbsp;Kari L Campeau,&nbsp;Olivia J Riggins,&nbsp;Erin Feddema,&nbsp;Sarah I Doornink,&nbsp;Stephanie Misono\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00472816211044498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Health and medical contexts have emerged as an important area of inquiry for researchers at the intersection of user experience and technical communication. In addressing this intersection, this article advocates and extends patient experience design or PXD (Melonçon, 2017) as an important framework for user experience research within health and medicine. Specifically, this article presents several PXD insights from a task-based usability study that examined an online intervention program for people with voice problems. We respond to Melonçon's call (2017) to build PXD as a framework for user experience and technical communication research by describing ways traditional usability methods can provide PXD insights and asking the following question: <i>What insights can emerge from combining traditional usability methods and PXD research?</i> In addressing this question, we outline two primary methodological and practical considerations we found central to conducting PXD research: 1) engaging patients as participants, and 2) leveraging multidisciplinary collaboration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of technical writing and communication\",\"volume\":\"51 4\",\"pages\":\"380-406\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9307135/pdf/nihms-1703342.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of technical writing and communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816211044498\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of technical writing and communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816211044498","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

健康和医疗背景已成为研究人员在用户体验和技术交流交叉领域的一个重要研究领域。在解决这一交叉点时,本文倡导并扩展了患者体验设计或PXD (melon, 2017),作为健康和医学领域用户体验研究的重要框架。具体来说,本文介绍了一项基于任务的可用性研究的几个PXD见解,该研究检查了针对有语音问题的人的在线干预程序。melon(2017)呼吁将PXD构建为用户体验和技术交流研究的框架,我们通过描述传统可用性方法提供PXD见解的方式,并提出以下问题:将传统可用性方法与PXD研究相结合,可以产生哪些见解?为了解决这个问题,我们概述了两个主要的方法和实践考虑因素,我们发现进行PXD研究的核心:1)吸引患者作为参与者,2)利用多学科合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
User Experience in Health & Medicine: Building Methods for Patient Experience Design in Multidisciplinary Collaborations.

Health and medical contexts have emerged as an important area of inquiry for researchers at the intersection of user experience and technical communication. In addressing this intersection, this article advocates and extends patient experience design or PXD (Melonçon, 2017) as an important framework for user experience research within health and medicine. Specifically, this article presents several PXD insights from a task-based usability study that examined an online intervention program for people with voice problems. We respond to Melonçon's call (2017) to build PXD as a framework for user experience and technical communication research by describing ways traditional usability methods can provide PXD insights and asking the following question: What insights can emerge from combining traditional usability methods and PXD research? In addressing this question, we outline two primary methodological and practical considerations we found central to conducting PXD research: 1) engaging patients as participants, and 2) leveraging multidisciplinary collaboration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信