数字化时代的关系:新关系形态中的分类与价值同质。

IF 1 2区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY
Journal of Chinese Sociology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-02 DOI:10.1186/s40711-022-00165-2
Anson Au
{"title":"数字化时代的关系:新关系形态中的分类与价值同质。","authors":"Anson Au","doi":"10.1186/s40711-022-00165-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How do people form personal ties? A consensus holds in sociological and social network scholarship that in-person networks are dominated by status homophily and that <i>guanxi</i> networks rely extensively on balance. This article argues that social networking sites (SNSs) reconceptualize the character of homophily and tie-formation altogether in <i>guanxi</i> networks. Drawing on 50 semi-structured interviews with Hong Kong youth from 2017 to 2020, this article examines how the technical capabilities of SNSs and principles of <i>guanxi</i> culture come together to erode status boundaries, create access to larger networks, and cause spillovers of information and tie strength. As a result, the basis of tie-formation in <i>guanxi</i> networks on SNSs shifts from balance to assortation and status homophily to value homophily. In this transformed calculus of tie-formation, two typologies of values rise to the fore: substantive values that reflect opinions and interests, as well as structural values that reflect networkability.</p>","PeriodicalId":52168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9286725/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>Guanxi</i> in an age of digitalization: toward assortation and value homophily in new tie-formation.\",\"authors\":\"Anson Au\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40711-022-00165-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>How do people form personal ties? A consensus holds in sociological and social network scholarship that in-person networks are dominated by status homophily and that <i>guanxi</i> networks rely extensively on balance. This article argues that social networking sites (SNSs) reconceptualize the character of homophily and tie-formation altogether in <i>guanxi</i> networks. Drawing on 50 semi-structured interviews with Hong Kong youth from 2017 to 2020, this article examines how the technical capabilities of SNSs and principles of <i>guanxi</i> culture come together to erode status boundaries, create access to larger networks, and cause spillovers of information and tie strength. As a result, the basis of tie-formation in <i>guanxi</i> networks on SNSs shifts from balance to assortation and status homophily to value homophily. In this transformed calculus of tie-formation, two typologies of values rise to the fore: substantive values that reflect opinions and interests, as well as structural values that reflect networkability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chinese Sociology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9286725/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chinese Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-022-00165-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-022-00165-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

人们是如何形成人际关系的?社会学和社会网络学界的共识是,面对面的网络由地位同质性主导,而关系网络广泛依赖于平衡。本文认为社交网站(sns)重新定义了关系网络中的同质性和联系形成的特征。本文从2017年至2020年对50名香港青年进行了半结构化访谈,研究了社交网站的技术能力和关系文化原则如何结合在一起,侵蚀身份界限,创造进入更大网络的途径,并导致信息溢出和关系强度。因此,社交网站上关系网络的关系形成基础从平衡转向分类,从地位同质转向价值同质。在这种转变的关系形成演算中,两种类型的价值观脱颖而出:反映意见和利益的实质性价值观,以及反映网络能力的结构性价值观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Guanxi in an age of digitalization: toward assortation and value homophily in new tie-formation.

How do people form personal ties? A consensus holds in sociological and social network scholarship that in-person networks are dominated by status homophily and that guanxi networks rely extensively on balance. This article argues that social networking sites (SNSs) reconceptualize the character of homophily and tie-formation altogether in guanxi networks. Drawing on 50 semi-structured interviews with Hong Kong youth from 2017 to 2020, this article examines how the technical capabilities of SNSs and principles of guanxi culture come together to erode status boundaries, create access to larger networks, and cause spillovers of information and tie strength. As a result, the basis of tie-formation in guanxi networks on SNSs shifts from balance to assortation and status homophily to value homophily. In this transformed calculus of tie-formation, two typologies of values rise to the fore: substantive values that reflect opinions and interests, as well as structural values that reflect networkability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chinese Sociology
Journal of Chinese Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信