泰国高血压自我护理量表2.0版的维度与信度评估

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Jom Suwanno , Chennet Phonphet , Ladda Thiamwong , Chidchanog Mayurapak , Putrada Ninla-aesong
{"title":"泰国高血压自我护理量表2.0版的维度与信度评估","authors":"Jom Suwanno ,&nbsp;Chennet Phonphet ,&nbsp;Ladda Thiamwong ,&nbsp;Chidchanog Mayurapak ,&nbsp;Putrada Ninla-aesong","doi":"10.1016/j.anr.2022.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Self-care is essential for hypertensive individuals to promote optimal health and illness treatment. We developed the Thai Self-Care of Hypertension Inventory (SC-HI) version 2.0 from the original US version using a multi-stage approach for cross-cultural adaptation. Scales previously studied outside a US context had different dimensions and factor solutions. Therefore, we examined the Thai SC-HI's factorial validity, construct validity, and internal reliability within a Thai context.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We administered a cross-sectional survey with hypertensive patients in 10 primary care settings, and conducted exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on two sets of separate samples from each of five sites to examine the model's factorial validity and construct validity. We estimated scale reliability with Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega coefficients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants were predominantly female, older adults, with mean age 66 years (SD = 11.94; range 36–97 years). The self-care maintenance scale had three factors and demonstrated good fit when the error covariances were respecified. The two-factor self-care management scale had different factorial solutions compared to previous models. The CFA result showed good fit indices for the Thai, original US, and Brazilian models. The self-care confidence scale was unidimensional, with partially supported fit indices that improved after we respecified the error covariances. Reliability coefficients estimated by difference methods were nearly equal: slightly lower than desired for self-care maintenance (.68–.70) and inadequate for self-care management (.62–.65); self-care confidence reliability was adequate (.89–.90).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Thai SC-HI has good psychometric characteristics and reflects the original instrument's theoretical basis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55450,"journal":{"name":"Asian Nursing Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1976131722000391/pdfft?md5=25611b9bd604a25fd21737320ca3663e&pid=1-s2.0-S1976131722000391-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Dimensionality and Reliability of the Thai Self-Care of Hypertension Inventory Version 2.0\",\"authors\":\"Jom Suwanno ,&nbsp;Chennet Phonphet ,&nbsp;Ladda Thiamwong ,&nbsp;Chidchanog Mayurapak ,&nbsp;Putrada Ninla-aesong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anr.2022.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Self-care is essential for hypertensive individuals to promote optimal health and illness treatment. We developed the Thai Self-Care of Hypertension Inventory (SC-HI) version 2.0 from the original US version using a multi-stage approach for cross-cultural adaptation. Scales previously studied outside a US context had different dimensions and factor solutions. Therefore, we examined the Thai SC-HI's factorial validity, construct validity, and internal reliability within a Thai context.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We administered a cross-sectional survey with hypertensive patients in 10 primary care settings, and conducted exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on two sets of separate samples from each of five sites to examine the model's factorial validity and construct validity. We estimated scale reliability with Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega coefficients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants were predominantly female, older adults, with mean age 66 years (SD = 11.94; range 36–97 years). The self-care maintenance scale had three factors and demonstrated good fit when the error covariances were respecified. The two-factor self-care management scale had different factorial solutions compared to previous models. The CFA result showed good fit indices for the Thai, original US, and Brazilian models. The self-care confidence scale was unidimensional, with partially supported fit indices that improved after we respecified the error covariances. Reliability coefficients estimated by difference methods were nearly equal: slightly lower than desired for self-care maintenance (.68–.70) and inadequate for self-care management (.62–.65); self-care confidence reliability was adequate (.89–.90).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Thai SC-HI has good psychometric characteristics and reflects the original instrument's theoretical basis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Nursing Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1976131722000391/pdfft?md5=25611b9bd604a25fd21737320ca3663e&pid=1-s2.0-S1976131722000391-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Nursing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1976131722000391\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1976131722000391","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:自我护理是高血压患者促进最佳健康和疾病治疗的必要条件。我们采用跨文化适应的多阶段方法,在美国原始版本的基础上开发了泰国高血压自我护理量表(SC-HI) 2.0版。以前在美国以外研究的量表有不同的维度和因子解决方案。因此,我们在泰国的背景下检验了泰国SC-HI的析因效度、结构效度和内部信度。方法对10个基层医疗机构的高血压患者进行横断面调查,分别对5个地点的两组独立样本进行探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA),检验模型的析因效度和结构效度。我们用Cronbach's alpha和McDonald's omega系数估计量表信度。结果参与者以老年女性为主,平均年龄66岁(SD = 11.94;范围36-97年)。自我照顾维持量表有三个因子,当重新指定误差协方差时,显示出良好的拟合。双因子自我保健管理量表与以往模型相比,具有不同的因子解。CFA结果显示泰国、原始美国和巴西模型的拟合指数良好。自我保健信心量表为单维量表,部分支持的拟合指数在我们重新指定误差协方差后得到改善。差异方法估计的信度系数几乎相等:自我护理维持略低于期望(0.68 - 0.70),自我护理管理不足(0.62 - 0.65);自我照顾信心信度足够(0.89 ~ 0.90)。结论泰国SC-HI量表具有良好的心理测量特征,反映了原量表的理论基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Dimensionality and Reliability of the Thai Self-Care of Hypertension Inventory Version 2.0

Purpose

Self-care is essential for hypertensive individuals to promote optimal health and illness treatment. We developed the Thai Self-Care of Hypertension Inventory (SC-HI) version 2.0 from the original US version using a multi-stage approach for cross-cultural adaptation. Scales previously studied outside a US context had different dimensions and factor solutions. Therefore, we examined the Thai SC-HI's factorial validity, construct validity, and internal reliability within a Thai context.

Methods

We administered a cross-sectional survey with hypertensive patients in 10 primary care settings, and conducted exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on two sets of separate samples from each of five sites to examine the model's factorial validity and construct validity. We estimated scale reliability with Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega coefficients.

Results

Participants were predominantly female, older adults, with mean age 66 years (SD = 11.94; range 36–97 years). The self-care maintenance scale had three factors and demonstrated good fit when the error covariances were respecified. The two-factor self-care management scale had different factorial solutions compared to previous models. The CFA result showed good fit indices for the Thai, original US, and Brazilian models. The self-care confidence scale was unidimensional, with partially supported fit indices that improved after we respecified the error covariances. Reliability coefficients estimated by difference methods were nearly equal: slightly lower than desired for self-care maintenance (.68–.70) and inadequate for self-care management (.62–.65); self-care confidence reliability was adequate (.89–.90).

Conclusion

The Thai SC-HI has good psychometric characteristics and reflects the original instrument's theoretical basis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
32
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Asian Nursing Research is the official peer-reviewed research journal of the Korean Society of Nursing Science, and is devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will contribute to the body of nursing science and inform the practice of nursing, nursing education, administration, and history, on health issues relevant to nursing, and on the testing of research findings in practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信