估计COVID-19的病死率和病例恢复率:这是正确的做法吗?

Central Asian Journal of Global Health Pub Date : 2021-01-15 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5195/cajgh.2021.489
Morteza Abdullatif Khafaie, Fakher Rahim
{"title":"估计COVID-19的病死率和病例恢复率:这是正确的做法吗?","authors":"Morteza Abdullatif Khafaie,&nbsp;Fakher Rahim","doi":"10.5195/cajgh.2021.489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Case fatality rates (CFRs) and case recovery rates (CRRs) are frequently used to define health consequences related to specific disease epidemics, including the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to compare various methods and models for calculating CFR and CRR related to COVID-19 based on the global and national data available as of April 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This analytical epidemiologic study was conducted based on detailed data from 210 countries and territories worldwide in April 2020. We used three different formulas to measure CFR and CRR, considering all possible scenarios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included information for 72 countries with more than 1,000 cases of COVID-19. Overall, using first, second, and third estimation models, the CFR were 6.22%, 21.20%, and 8.67%, respectively; similarly, the CRR was estimated as 23.21%, 78.86%, 32.23%, respectively. We have shown that CFRs vary so much spatially and depend on the estimation method and timing of case reports, likely resulting in overestimation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Even with the more precise method of CFRs estimation, the value is overestimated. Case fatality and recovery rates should not be the only measures used to evaluate disease severity, and the better assessment measures need to be developed as indicators of countries' performance during COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":42537,"journal":{"name":"Central Asian Journal of Global Health","volume":"10 1","pages":"e489"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291733/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating Case Fatality and Case Recovery Rates of COVID-19: is this the right thing to do?\",\"authors\":\"Morteza Abdullatif Khafaie,&nbsp;Fakher Rahim\",\"doi\":\"10.5195/cajgh.2021.489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Case fatality rates (CFRs) and case recovery rates (CRRs) are frequently used to define health consequences related to specific disease epidemics, including the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to compare various methods and models for calculating CFR and CRR related to COVID-19 based on the global and national data available as of April 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This analytical epidemiologic study was conducted based on detailed data from 210 countries and territories worldwide in April 2020. We used three different formulas to measure CFR and CRR, considering all possible scenarios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included information for 72 countries with more than 1,000 cases of COVID-19. Overall, using first, second, and third estimation models, the CFR were 6.22%, 21.20%, and 8.67%, respectively; similarly, the CRR was estimated as 23.21%, 78.86%, 32.23%, respectively. We have shown that CFRs vary so much spatially and depend on the estimation method and timing of case reports, likely resulting in overestimation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Even with the more precise method of CFRs estimation, the value is overestimated. Case fatality and recovery rates should not be the only measures used to evaluate disease severity, and the better assessment measures need to be developed as indicators of countries' performance during COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central Asian Journal of Global Health\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"e489\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291733/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central Asian Journal of Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5195/cajgh.2021.489\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central Asian Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/cajgh.2021.489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

病死率(CFRs)和病例恢复率(crr)经常用于确定与特定疾病流行(包括COVID-19大流行)相关的健康后果。本研究旨在根据截至2020年4月的全球和国家数据,比较计算与COVID-19相关的病死率和CRR的各种方法和模型。方法:本分析流行病学研究基于2020年4月全球210个国家和地区的详细数据。考虑到所有可能的情况,我们使用了三种不同的公式来测量CFR和CRR。结果:我们纳入了72个国家的信息,这些国家的COVID-19病例超过1000例。总体而言,使用第一、第二和第三种估计模型,CFR分别为6.22%、21.20%和8.67%;CRR分别为23.21%、78.86%、32.23%。我们已经表明,CFRs在空间上变化很大,并且取决于病例报告的估计方法和时间,这可能导致高估。结论:即使采用更精确的CFRs估计方法,其价值仍被高估。病死率和康复率不应成为评估疾病严重程度的唯一指标,需要制定更好的评估措施,作为各国在COVID-19大流行期间表现的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Estimating Case Fatality and Case Recovery Rates of COVID-19: is this the right thing to do?

Estimating Case Fatality and Case Recovery Rates of COVID-19: is this the right thing to do?

Estimating Case Fatality and Case Recovery Rates of COVID-19: is this the right thing to do?

Introduction: Case fatality rates (CFRs) and case recovery rates (CRRs) are frequently used to define health consequences related to specific disease epidemics, including the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to compare various methods and models for calculating CFR and CRR related to COVID-19 based on the global and national data available as of April 2020.

Methods: This analytical epidemiologic study was conducted based on detailed data from 210 countries and territories worldwide in April 2020. We used three different formulas to measure CFR and CRR, considering all possible scenarios.

Results: We included information for 72 countries with more than 1,000 cases of COVID-19. Overall, using first, second, and third estimation models, the CFR were 6.22%, 21.20%, and 8.67%, respectively; similarly, the CRR was estimated as 23.21%, 78.86%, 32.23%, respectively. We have shown that CFRs vary so much spatially and depend on the estimation method and timing of case reports, likely resulting in overestimation.

Conclusions: Even with the more precise method of CFRs estimation, the value is overestimated. Case fatality and recovery rates should not be the only measures used to evaluate disease severity, and the better assessment measures need to be developed as indicators of countries' performance during COVID-19 pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Central Asian Journal of Global Health
Central Asian Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信