PET/MR联合检测重症大血管炎。

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
John W Cerne, Sophia Liu, Muhammad Umair, Ashitha Pathrose, Jackson E Moore, Bradley D Allen, Michael Markl, James C Carr, Hatice Savas, Lisa Wilsbacher, Ryan Avery
{"title":"PET/MR联合检测重症大血管炎。","authors":"John W Cerne,&nbsp;Sophia Liu,&nbsp;Muhammad Umair,&nbsp;Ashitha Pathrose,&nbsp;Jackson E Moore,&nbsp;Bradley D Allen,&nbsp;Michael Markl,&nbsp;James C Carr,&nbsp;Hatice Savas,&nbsp;Lisa Wilsbacher,&nbsp;Ryan Avery","doi":"10.1186/s41824-022-00136-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Large vessel vasculitis (LVV) can be characterized based on symptom severity, and this characterization helps clinicians decide upon treatment approach. Our aim was to compare the imaging findings of combined modality positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MR) and inflammatory markers between severe and non-severe LVV. A retrospective query was performed to identify all patients with LVV who underwent PET/MR at our institution between January 2015 and January 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven patients (nine females; age 62.2 ± 16.4 years) underwent 15 PET/MR scans. Positivity was defined by findings indicative of active LVV on each modality: PET positive if vessel metabolic activity > liver metabolic activity; MR positive if wall thickening or contrast enhancement. When positive PET or positive MR findings were considered a positive scan, LVV patients with severe disease (n = 9 scans) showed a higher number of positive scans (n = 9) compared to the number of positive scans in non-severe patients (n = 3) (p < 0.05). The sensitivity and specificity for the detection of severe LVV were 1.00 and 0.50, respectively. When only the presence of both positive PET and positive MR findings were considered a positive scan, inflammatory marker levels were not significantly different between severe and non-severe LVV groups (severe: erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) = 9.8 ± 10.6 mm/h; C-reactive protein (CRP) = 0.6 ± 0.4 mg/dL) (non-severe: ESR = 14.3 ± 22.4 mm/h; CRP = 0.5 ± 0.6 mg/dL). Blood- and liver-normalized maximum standardized uptake values were not significantly different between severe and non-severe patients (1.4 ± 0.3 vs 1.5 ± 0.4; 1.1 ± 0.4 vs 1.0 ± 0.3, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Because of the differences observed, PET/MR appears to be better suited to facilitate the characterization of LVV as severe or non-severe compared to inflammatory marker measurements and quantitative measurements of metabolic activity. Qualitative assessment of PET and MR positivity by <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/MR may be able to supplement clinical symptoms-based LVV classification decisions and may be helpful when clinical symptoms overlap with other disease processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":36160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Hybrid Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9376186/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined modality PET/MR for the detection of severe large vessel vasculitis.\",\"authors\":\"John W Cerne,&nbsp;Sophia Liu,&nbsp;Muhammad Umair,&nbsp;Ashitha Pathrose,&nbsp;Jackson E Moore,&nbsp;Bradley D Allen,&nbsp;Michael Markl,&nbsp;James C Carr,&nbsp;Hatice Savas,&nbsp;Lisa Wilsbacher,&nbsp;Ryan Avery\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41824-022-00136-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Large vessel vasculitis (LVV) can be characterized based on symptom severity, and this characterization helps clinicians decide upon treatment approach. Our aim was to compare the imaging findings of combined modality positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MR) and inflammatory markers between severe and non-severe LVV. A retrospective query was performed to identify all patients with LVV who underwent PET/MR at our institution between January 2015 and January 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven patients (nine females; age 62.2 ± 16.4 years) underwent 15 PET/MR scans. Positivity was defined by findings indicative of active LVV on each modality: PET positive if vessel metabolic activity > liver metabolic activity; MR positive if wall thickening or contrast enhancement. When positive PET or positive MR findings were considered a positive scan, LVV patients with severe disease (n = 9 scans) showed a higher number of positive scans (n = 9) compared to the number of positive scans in non-severe patients (n = 3) (p < 0.05). The sensitivity and specificity for the detection of severe LVV were 1.00 and 0.50, respectively. When only the presence of both positive PET and positive MR findings were considered a positive scan, inflammatory marker levels were not significantly different between severe and non-severe LVV groups (severe: erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) = 9.8 ± 10.6 mm/h; C-reactive protein (CRP) = 0.6 ± 0.4 mg/dL) (non-severe: ESR = 14.3 ± 22.4 mm/h; CRP = 0.5 ± 0.6 mg/dL). Blood- and liver-normalized maximum standardized uptake values were not significantly different between severe and non-severe patients (1.4 ± 0.3 vs 1.5 ± 0.4; 1.1 ± 0.4 vs 1.0 ± 0.3, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Because of the differences observed, PET/MR appears to be better suited to facilitate the characterization of LVV as severe or non-severe compared to inflammatory marker measurements and quantitative measurements of metabolic activity. Qualitative assessment of PET and MR positivity by <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/MR may be able to supplement clinical symptoms-based LVV classification decisions and may be helpful when clinical symptoms overlap with other disease processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Hybrid Imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9376186/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Hybrid Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-022-00136-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Hybrid Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-022-00136-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:大血管炎(LVV)可以根据症状严重程度进行表征,这种表征有助于临床医生决定治疗方法。我们的目的是比较严重和非严重LVV的联合模态正电子发射断层扫描/磁共振(PET/MR)和炎症标志物的成像结果。对2015年1月至2021年1月期间在我院接受PET/MR检查的所有LVV患者进行回顾性查询。结果:11例患者(女性9例;年龄(62.2±16.4岁)15次PET/MR扫描。通过各模式下LVV活动的结果来定义阳性:如果血管代谢活动>肝脏代谢活动,则PET阳性;如果壁增厚或增强,MR呈阳性。当PET阳性或MR阳性结果被认为是阳性扫描时,严重LVV患者(n = 9次扫描)的阳性扫描次数(n = 9次)高于非严重患者(n = 3次)(p结论:由于观察到的差异,与炎症标志物测量和代谢活性定量测量相比,PET/MR似乎更适合于促进LVV严重或非严重的表征。通过18f -氟脱氧葡萄糖PET/MR定性评估PET和MR阳性可能能够补充基于临床症状的LVV分类决策,并且当临床症状与其他疾病过程重叠时可能会有所帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Combined modality PET/MR for the detection of severe large vessel vasculitis.

Combined modality PET/MR for the detection of severe large vessel vasculitis.

Combined modality PET/MR for the detection of severe large vessel vasculitis.

Combined modality PET/MR for the detection of severe large vessel vasculitis.

Background: Large vessel vasculitis (LVV) can be characterized based on symptom severity, and this characterization helps clinicians decide upon treatment approach. Our aim was to compare the imaging findings of combined modality positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MR) and inflammatory markers between severe and non-severe LVV. A retrospective query was performed to identify all patients with LVV who underwent PET/MR at our institution between January 2015 and January 2021.

Results: Eleven patients (nine females; age 62.2 ± 16.4 years) underwent 15 PET/MR scans. Positivity was defined by findings indicative of active LVV on each modality: PET positive if vessel metabolic activity > liver metabolic activity; MR positive if wall thickening or contrast enhancement. When positive PET or positive MR findings were considered a positive scan, LVV patients with severe disease (n = 9 scans) showed a higher number of positive scans (n = 9) compared to the number of positive scans in non-severe patients (n = 3) (p < 0.05). The sensitivity and specificity for the detection of severe LVV were 1.00 and 0.50, respectively. When only the presence of both positive PET and positive MR findings were considered a positive scan, inflammatory marker levels were not significantly different between severe and non-severe LVV groups (severe: erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) = 9.8 ± 10.6 mm/h; C-reactive protein (CRP) = 0.6 ± 0.4 mg/dL) (non-severe: ESR = 14.3 ± 22.4 mm/h; CRP = 0.5 ± 0.6 mg/dL). Blood- and liver-normalized maximum standardized uptake values were not significantly different between severe and non-severe patients (1.4 ± 0.3 vs 1.5 ± 0.4; 1.1 ± 0.4 vs 1.0 ± 0.3, respectively).

Conclusions: Because of the differences observed, PET/MR appears to be better suited to facilitate the characterization of LVV as severe or non-severe compared to inflammatory marker measurements and quantitative measurements of metabolic activity. Qualitative assessment of PET and MR positivity by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/MR may be able to supplement clinical symptoms-based LVV classification decisions and may be helpful when clinical symptoms overlap with other disease processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Hybrid Imaging
European Journal of Hybrid Imaging Computer Science-Computer Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信