使用世卫组织定义分类的南亚新生儿疾病的感染病因:对ANISA研究的初步分析。

Melissa L Arvay, Nong Shang, Shamim A Qazi, Gary L Darmstadt, Mohammad Shahidul Islam, Daniel E Roth, Anran Liu, Nicholas E Connor, Belal Hossain, Qazi Sadeq-Ur Rahman, Shams El Arifeen, Luke C Mullany, Anita K M Zaidi, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Sajid B Soofi, Yasir Shafiq, Abdullah H Baqui, Dipak K Mitra, Pinaki Panigrahi, Kalpana Panigrahi, Anuradha Bose, Rita Isaac, Daniel Westreich, Steven R Meshnick, Samir K Saha, Stephanie J Schrag
{"title":"使用世卫组织定义分类的南亚新生儿疾病的感染病因:对ANISA研究的初步分析。","authors":"Melissa L Arvay, Nong Shang, Shamim A Qazi, Gary L Darmstadt, Mohammad Shahidul Islam, Daniel E Roth, Anran Liu, Nicholas E Connor, Belal Hossain, Qazi Sadeq-Ur Rahman, Shams El Arifeen, Luke C Mullany, Anita K M Zaidi, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Sajid B Soofi, Yasir Shafiq, Abdullah H Baqui, Dipak K Mitra, Pinaki Panigrahi, Kalpana Panigrahi, Anuradha Bose, Rita Isaac, Daniel Westreich, Steven R Meshnick, Samir K Saha, Stephanie J Schrag","doi":"10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00244-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, neonatal mortality accounts for almost half of all deaths in children younger than 5 years. Aetiological agents of neonatal infection are difficult to identify because the clinical signs are non-specific. Using data from the Aetiology of Neonatal Infections in south Asia (ANISA) cohort, we aimed to describe the spectrum of infectious aetiologies of acute neonatal illness categorised post-hoc using the 2015 WHO case definitions of critical illness, clinical severe infection, and fast breathing only.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible infants were aged 0-59 days with possible serious bacterial infection and healthy infants enrolled in the ANISA study in Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan. We applied a partial latent class Bayesian model to estimate the prevalence of 27 pathogens detectable on PCR, pathogens detected by blood culture only, and illness not attributed to any infectious aetiology. Infants with at least one clinical specimen available were included in the analysis. We assessed the prevalence of these aetiologies according to WHO's case definitions of critically ill, clinical severe infection, and infants with late onset, isolated fast breathing. For the clinical severe definition, we compared the prevalence of signs by bacterial versus viral aetiology.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>There were 934 infants (992 episodes) in the critically ill category, 3769 (4000 episodes) in the clinical severe infection category, and 738 (771 episodes) in the late-onset isolated fast breathing category. We estimated the proportion of illness attributable to bacterial infection was 32·7% in infants in the critically ill group, 15·6% in the clinical severe infection group, and 8·8% among infants with late-onset isolated fast breathing group. An infectious aetiology was not identified in 58-82% of infants in these categories. Among 4000 episodes of clinical severe infection, those with bacterial versus viral attribution had higher proportions of hypothermia, movement only when stimulated, convulsions, and poor feeding.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our modelled results generally support the revised WHO case definitions, although a revision of the most severe case definition could be considered. Clinical criteria do not clearly differentiate between young infants with and without infectious aetiologies. Our results highlight the need for improved point-of-care diagnostics, and further study into neonatal deaths and episodes with no identified aetiology, to ensure antibiotic stewardship and targeted interventions.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.</p>","PeriodicalId":153380,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet. Global health","volume":" ","pages":"e1289-e1297"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9380253/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Infectious aetiologies of neonatal illness in south Asia classified using WHO definitions: a primary analysis of the ANISA study.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa L Arvay, Nong Shang, Shamim A Qazi, Gary L Darmstadt, Mohammad Shahidul Islam, Daniel E Roth, Anran Liu, Nicholas E Connor, Belal Hossain, Qazi Sadeq-Ur Rahman, Shams El Arifeen, Luke C Mullany, Anita K M Zaidi, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Sajid B Soofi, Yasir Shafiq, Abdullah H Baqui, Dipak K Mitra, Pinaki Panigrahi, Kalpana Panigrahi, Anuradha Bose, Rita Isaac, Daniel Westreich, Steven R Meshnick, Samir K Saha, Stephanie J Schrag\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00244-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, neonatal mortality accounts for almost half of all deaths in children younger than 5 years. Aetiological agents of neonatal infection are difficult to identify because the clinical signs are non-specific. Using data from the Aetiology of Neonatal Infections in south Asia (ANISA) cohort, we aimed to describe the spectrum of infectious aetiologies of acute neonatal illness categorised post-hoc using the 2015 WHO case definitions of critical illness, clinical severe infection, and fast breathing only.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible infants were aged 0-59 days with possible serious bacterial infection and healthy infants enrolled in the ANISA study in Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan. We applied a partial latent class Bayesian model to estimate the prevalence of 27 pathogens detectable on PCR, pathogens detected by blood culture only, and illness not attributed to any infectious aetiology. Infants with at least one clinical specimen available were included in the analysis. We assessed the prevalence of these aetiologies according to WHO's case definitions of critically ill, clinical severe infection, and infants with late onset, isolated fast breathing. For the clinical severe definition, we compared the prevalence of signs by bacterial versus viral aetiology.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>There were 934 infants (992 episodes) in the critically ill category, 3769 (4000 episodes) in the clinical severe infection category, and 738 (771 episodes) in the late-onset isolated fast breathing category. We estimated the proportion of illness attributable to bacterial infection was 32·7% in infants in the critically ill group, 15·6% in the clinical severe infection group, and 8·8% among infants with late-onset isolated fast breathing group. An infectious aetiology was not identified in 58-82% of infants in these categories. Among 4000 episodes of clinical severe infection, those with bacterial versus viral attribution had higher proportions of hypothermia, movement only when stimulated, convulsions, and poor feeding.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our modelled results generally support the revised WHO case definitions, although a revision of the most severe case definition could be considered. Clinical criteria do not clearly differentiate between young infants with and without infectious aetiologies. Our results highlight the need for improved point-of-care diagnostics, and further study into neonatal deaths and episodes with no identified aetiology, to ensure antibiotic stewardship and targeted interventions.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":153380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Lancet. Global health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e1289-e1297\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9380253/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Lancet. Global health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00244-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet. Global health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00244-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在全球范围内,新生儿死亡率几乎占5岁以下儿童死亡总数的一半。新生儿感染的病因很难确定,因为临床症状是非特异性的。使用来自南亚新生儿感染病因学(ANISA)队列的数据,我们旨在描述急性新生儿疾病的感染病因谱,这些疾病采用2015年世卫组织对危重疾病、临床严重感染和仅呼吸急促的病例定义进行分类。方法:在孟加拉国、印度和巴基斯坦参加ANISA研究的0-59天可能存在严重细菌感染的婴儿和健康婴儿均符合条件。我们应用部分潜伏类贝叶斯模型来估计PCR检测到的27种病原体的患病率,仅通过血液培养检测到的病原体,以及不归因于任何感染病因的疾病。至少有一个临床标本的婴儿被纳入分析。我们根据世卫组织对危重症、临床严重感染和晚发性孤立性呼吸急促婴儿的病例定义评估了这些病因的患病率。对于临床严重的定义,我们比较了细菌病原学和病毒病原学症状的流行程度。结果:重症患儿934例(992次),临床重症感染患儿3769例(4000次),晚发型孤立性快呼吸患儿738例(771次)。我们估计,危重组婴儿中细菌感染的比例为32.7%,临床严重感染组为15.6%,晚发型孤立快速呼吸组为8.8%。在这些类别中,58-82%的婴儿未发现感染性病因。在4000例临床严重感染中,细菌感染与病毒感染的患者出现体温过低、仅在受到刺激时才活动、抽搐和进食不良的比例更高。解释:我们的模拟结果总体上支持修订后的世卫组织病例定义,尽管可以考虑对最严重病例定义进行修订。临床标准没有明确区分有和没有感染性病因的婴儿。我们的研究结果强调需要改进即时诊断,并进一步研究新生儿死亡和未确定病因的事件,以确保抗生素管理和有针对性的干预措施。资助:比尔和梅林达·盖茨基金会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Infectious aetiologies of neonatal illness in south Asia classified using WHO definitions: a primary analysis of the ANISA study.

Infectious aetiologies of neonatal illness in south Asia classified using WHO definitions: a primary analysis of the ANISA study.

Infectious aetiologies of neonatal illness in south Asia classified using WHO definitions: a primary analysis of the ANISA study.

Infectious aetiologies of neonatal illness in south Asia classified using WHO definitions: a primary analysis of the ANISA study.

Background: Globally, neonatal mortality accounts for almost half of all deaths in children younger than 5 years. Aetiological agents of neonatal infection are difficult to identify because the clinical signs are non-specific. Using data from the Aetiology of Neonatal Infections in south Asia (ANISA) cohort, we aimed to describe the spectrum of infectious aetiologies of acute neonatal illness categorised post-hoc using the 2015 WHO case definitions of critical illness, clinical severe infection, and fast breathing only.

Methods: Eligible infants were aged 0-59 days with possible serious bacterial infection and healthy infants enrolled in the ANISA study in Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan. We applied a partial latent class Bayesian model to estimate the prevalence of 27 pathogens detectable on PCR, pathogens detected by blood culture only, and illness not attributed to any infectious aetiology. Infants with at least one clinical specimen available were included in the analysis. We assessed the prevalence of these aetiologies according to WHO's case definitions of critically ill, clinical severe infection, and infants with late onset, isolated fast breathing. For the clinical severe definition, we compared the prevalence of signs by bacterial versus viral aetiology.

Findings: There were 934 infants (992 episodes) in the critically ill category, 3769 (4000 episodes) in the clinical severe infection category, and 738 (771 episodes) in the late-onset isolated fast breathing category. We estimated the proportion of illness attributable to bacterial infection was 32·7% in infants in the critically ill group, 15·6% in the clinical severe infection group, and 8·8% among infants with late-onset isolated fast breathing group. An infectious aetiology was not identified in 58-82% of infants in these categories. Among 4000 episodes of clinical severe infection, those with bacterial versus viral attribution had higher proportions of hypothermia, movement only when stimulated, convulsions, and poor feeding.

Interpretation: Our modelled results generally support the revised WHO case definitions, although a revision of the most severe case definition could be considered. Clinical criteria do not clearly differentiate between young infants with and without infectious aetiologies. Our results highlight the need for improved point-of-care diagnostics, and further study into neonatal deaths and episodes with no identified aetiology, to ensure antibiotic stewardship and targeted interventions.

Funding: The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信