不同胃肠重建技术对腹腔镜胃癌远端胃切除术患者营养、贫血及生活质量的影响。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Acta cirurgica brasileira Pub Date : 2022-07-15 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1590/acb370408
Bu Jun, Li Nian, He Shan, Yuan Hong-Jun, Deng Heng-Yi, Wen Wu, Yang Xiao-Yan
{"title":"不同胃肠重建技术对腹腔镜胃癌远端胃切除术患者营养、贫血及生活质量的影响。","authors":"Bu Jun,&nbsp;Li Nian,&nbsp;He Shan,&nbsp;Yuan Hong-Jun,&nbsp;Deng Heng-Yi,&nbsp;Wen Wu,&nbsp;Yang Xiao-Yan","doi":"10.1590/acb370408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the effect of different gastrointestinal reconstruction techniques on laparoscopic distal gastrectomy of gastric cancer on the nutritional and anemia status, and quality of life (QoL) of patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible patients were randomly divided into three groups (n=36/group): Billroth I anastomosis group, Billroth II combined with Braun anastomosis group, and Roux-en-Y anastomosis group. Related indicators were compared and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The general data were comparable among the three groups (all P>0.05). Among the surgical-related indicators and postoperative recovery indicators, only the comparison of the operation time was statistically significant (P=0.004). The follow-up time was 5~36 months (average 27.9 months). In terms of nutritional and anemia indicators, only the differences in the levels of prealbumin, hemoglobin and serum ferritin in 24 months after operation showed significant differences (P=0.015, P=0.003, P=0.005, respectively). There were no significant differences in hospital readmission rate, overall survival, and QoL among the three groups (all P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In laparoscopic gastrectomy for stage II~III distal gastric cancer, Billroth I anastomosis has shorter operation time than Billroth II combined with Braun anastomosis and Roux-en-Y anastomosis and advantages in the improvement of nutritional status and anemia recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":6992,"journal":{"name":"Acta cirurgica brasileira","volume":"37 4","pages":"e370408"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290764/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of different gastrointestinal reconstruction techniques on nutrition, anemia, and quality of life in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Bu Jun,&nbsp;Li Nian,&nbsp;He Shan,&nbsp;Yuan Hong-Jun,&nbsp;Deng Heng-Yi,&nbsp;Wen Wu,&nbsp;Yang Xiao-Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/acb370408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the effect of different gastrointestinal reconstruction techniques on laparoscopic distal gastrectomy of gastric cancer on the nutritional and anemia status, and quality of life (QoL) of patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible patients were randomly divided into three groups (n=36/group): Billroth I anastomosis group, Billroth II combined with Braun anastomosis group, and Roux-en-Y anastomosis group. Related indicators were compared and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The general data were comparable among the three groups (all P>0.05). Among the surgical-related indicators and postoperative recovery indicators, only the comparison of the operation time was statistically significant (P=0.004). The follow-up time was 5~36 months (average 27.9 months). In terms of nutritional and anemia indicators, only the differences in the levels of prealbumin, hemoglobin and serum ferritin in 24 months after operation showed significant differences (P=0.015, P=0.003, P=0.005, respectively). There were no significant differences in hospital readmission rate, overall survival, and QoL among the three groups (all P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In laparoscopic gastrectomy for stage II~III distal gastric cancer, Billroth I anastomosis has shorter operation time than Billroth II combined with Braun anastomosis and Roux-en-Y anastomosis and advantages in the improvement of nutritional status and anemia recovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta cirurgica brasileira\",\"volume\":\"37 4\",\"pages\":\"e370408\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9290764/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta cirurgica brasileira\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/acb370408\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta cirurgica brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/acb370408","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:探讨腹腔镜胃癌远端胃切除术中不同胃肠重建技术对患者营养、贫血状况及生活质量的影响。方法:符合条件的患者随机分为3组(n=36/组):Billroth I吻合组、Billroth II联合Braun吻合组和Roux-en-Y吻合组。对相关指标进行比较分析。结果:三组患者一般资料比较,差异均有统计学意义(P>0.05)。手术相关指标与术后恢复指标中,只有手术时间的比较有统计学意义(P=0.004)。随访5~36个月,平均27.9个月。在营养和贫血指标方面,仅术后24个月前白蛋白、血红蛋白和血清铁蛋白水平差异有统计学意义(P=0.015, P=0.003, P=0.005)。三组患者再入院率、总生存率、生活质量比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:在腹腔镜II~III期远端胃癌切除术中,Billroth I吻合比Billroth II联合Braun吻合和Roux-en-Y吻合的手术时间更短,且在改善营养状况和贫血恢复方面具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects of different gastrointestinal reconstruction techniques on nutrition, anemia, and quality of life in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Effects of different gastrointestinal reconstruction techniques on nutrition, anemia, and quality of life in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Effects of different gastrointestinal reconstruction techniques on nutrition, anemia, and quality of life in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Purpose: To explore the effect of different gastrointestinal reconstruction techniques on laparoscopic distal gastrectomy of gastric cancer on the nutritional and anemia status, and quality of life (QoL) of patients.

Methods: Eligible patients were randomly divided into three groups (n=36/group): Billroth I anastomosis group, Billroth II combined with Braun anastomosis group, and Roux-en-Y anastomosis group. Related indicators were compared and analyzed.

Results: The general data were comparable among the three groups (all P>0.05). Among the surgical-related indicators and postoperative recovery indicators, only the comparison of the operation time was statistically significant (P=0.004). The follow-up time was 5~36 months (average 27.9 months). In terms of nutritional and anemia indicators, only the differences in the levels of prealbumin, hemoglobin and serum ferritin in 24 months after operation showed significant differences (P=0.015, P=0.003, P=0.005, respectively). There were no significant differences in hospital readmission rate, overall survival, and QoL among the three groups (all P>0.05).

Conclusions: In laparoscopic gastrectomy for stage II~III distal gastric cancer, Billroth I anastomosis has shorter operation time than Billroth II combined with Braun anastomosis and Roux-en-Y anastomosis and advantages in the improvement of nutritional status and anemia recovery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
60
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信